12339 results for "cancer rna-seq"

in 24.68 milliseconds.

• Xenograft_Sequencing

  Sequencing of mouse/human carcinoma xenograft samples.

  Study EGAS00001000140

• HCA Organoids | Colon - Cancer, Nanopore Sequencing Data

  Nanopore Sequencing Data

  Dataset EGAD00001015536

• Genomic Sequencing of Triple Negative Breast Cancer - Exome data

  Exome data for study EGAS00001008261

  Dataset EGAD00001015687

• Metastatic Prostate Follow Up 2

  Validation/deeper sequencing for metastatic prostate cancer samples

  Dataset EGAD00001000989

• Integration of T Cell Repertoire, CyTOF, genotyping and symptomatology data reveals subphenotypic variability in COVID-19 Patients

  A total of 61 patients (33 mild and 28 severe) with a median age of 51 years who recovered from COVID-19 were included in this study (Table 1). All collected samples were confirmed in diagnosis of COVID-19 by RT-PCR and positive IgG serolog. For the 61 patients, TCR-seq, CyTOF, and genotyping data were generated and analyzed in separate studies, as part of larger cohorts. In total, there are 143 variables, with 129 being quantitative (TCRseq and CyTOF metrics) and 13 being qualitative (symptomatology and genotyping). For more information about cohort characteristics, data adquisition an pre-processing, please visit PMID: 39227859, 36969980 and 37287057.

  Dataset EGAD50000000840

• Targeted long-read snIso-Seq of the human brain in neurodegenerative diseases

  Nuclei were extracted from postmortem human brain, and cDNA libraries were generated using the 10X Genomics 3' v3.1 kit. Prior to fragmentation, 75% of the library was reserved for long-read sequencing. This unfragmented library was used for target enrichment with a custom 50 gene probe panel from Twist Biosciences. The resulting amplified cDNA libraries were sequenced on a Sequel II. The files provided have undergone CCS generation, and we recommend following the guidelines in https://isoseq.how/ for further analysis starting with removal of primers using lima. The primer sequences that should be supplied are the Read 1 and TSO primers from the 10X Genomics kit.

  Dataset EGAD50000000179

• scATAC-seq of CD4+ T cells from blood, lymph nodes and tumors of NSCLC patients

  This study explore the CD4+ T cells diversity in paired blood, lymph nodes and tumors of 2 different NSCLC patients. After FACS-sorted of Tregs (DAPI- CD45+ CD4+ CD25hi CD127lo) and Tconvs (DAPI- CD45+ CD4+CD25lo CD127lo/hi), cells were mixed in equal proportion (fifty/fifty ratio) and procesed with 10X Chromium (10X Genomics) scATAC kit and sequenced using Illumina platforms.

  Study EGAS50000000294

• LLD PhIPSeq

  LLD PhIP-Seq reads. Oligopeptides were designed at Eran's Segal group at Weizmann Institute of Science. Dataset include 1,783 plasma samples. In 340 participants, a second time point was taken after a 4-year follow-up.

  Dataset EGAD00001010104

• DPY30 ChIP-seq

  H9 human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were cultured in feeder-free chemically-defined conditions in medium containing 10ng/ml Activin A and 12ng/ml FGF2 (Vallier L. 2011, Methods in Molecular Biology, 690: 57-66). Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as described in Brown S. et al. 2011. Stem Cells 29: 1176-85 by using 5ug of anti-DPY30 antibody (Sigma, cat. number HPA043761). This protocol was performed in control hESCs (expressing a scrambled shRNA) and in hESCs stably expressing an shRNA against DPY30 (Sigma, clone n. TRCN0000131112).This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/

  Dataset EGAD00001001268

• Characterization of individual foci of multicentric/multifocal breast cancer using targeted next generation sequencing

  Multifocality or multicentricity in breast cancer may be defined as the presence of two or more tumor foci within a single quadrant of the breast or within different quadrants of the same breast, respectively. This original classification of the breast cancer as multicentric or multifocal was based on the assumption that cancers arising in the same quadrant were more likely to arise from the same ductal structures than those occurring in separate areas of the breast. The problem with these definitions is that the ?quadrants? of the breast are arbitrary external designations, as no internal boundaries do exist. This project will therefore focus both on synchronous multifocal and multicentric tumors. The incidence of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers was reported to be between 13 and 75% depending on the definition used, the extent of the pathologic sampling of the breast and whether in situ disease is considered evidence of multicentricity (1). Although this incidence is variable, those figures show that it is a frequent phenomenon. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic management of the cancer. Multifocality or multicentricity has been associated with a number of more aggressive features including an increased rate of regional lymph node metastases and adverse patient outcome when compared with unifocal tumors (2-3), and a possible increased risk of local recurrence following breast conserving surgery (4). For the moment, the literature is divided on whether there is a corresponding impact on survival outcomes. Today, the current convention to stage and to treat multifocal and multicentric tumors is the classical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging guidelines with which tumor size is assessed by the largest tumor focus without taking other foci of disease into consideration. If some papers, as the recent one from Lynch and colleagues, support the current staging convention (3), others, however, as Boyages et al. suggested that aggregate size and not the size of the largest lesion should be considered in order to refine the prognostic assessment of those tumors (5). On the top of that, the question whether multifocal/multicentric carcinomas are due to the spread of a single carcinoma throughout the breast or is due to multiple carcinomas arising simultaneously has been a matter of debate. Some studies suggested that multifocal breast cancer may result from either intramammary spread from a single primary tumor or multiple synchronous primary tumors; whereas others suggest that multiple breast carcinomas always arise from the same clone (6-8). Recently, Pietri and colleagues analyzed the biological characterization of a series of 113 multifocal/multicentric breast cancers (8) which were diagnosed over a 5-year period. The expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors, Ki-67 proliferative index, expression of HER2 and tumor grading were prospectively determined in each tumor focus, and mismatches among foci were recorded. Mismatches in ER status were present in 5 (4.4%) cases and PgR in 18 (15.9%) cases. Mismatches in tumor grading were present in 21 cases (18.6%), proliferative index (Ki-67) in 17 (15%) cases and HER2 status in 11 (9.7%) cases. Interestingly, this heterogeneity among foci has led to 14 (12.4%) patients receiving different adjuvant treatments compared with what would have been indicated if we had only taken into account the biologic status of the primary tumor. This study therefore showed that differences in biological characteristics of multifocal/multicentric lesions play a crucial role in the adjuvant treatment decision making process. In this study, we will concentrate on a larger series of patients with multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer lesions. We aim at: 1. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality according to the different breast cancer molecular subtypes (ER-/HER2-, HER2+, ER+/HER2-). 2. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality in patients with hereditary breast cancer disease (presence of germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations). Moreover, we would like to investigate if multifocal lesions with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations exhibit a characteristic combination of substitution mutation signatures and a distinctive profile of deletions as demonstrated recently by Nik-Zainal and colleagues (9). 3. Correlating multifocality with clinical information in order to define its influence on patients? survival (DFS and OS). 4. Carrying high coverage targeted gene sequencing of driver cancer genes and genes whose mutation is of therapeutic importance in order to compare clinically-relevant genetic differences between several multifocal breast cancer lesions. 5. Evaluating the impact of the distance between the different lesions on the clinical outcome but also on the genetic differences. 6. Comparing gene expression patterns between several multifocal breast cancer lesions and correlate them with the results of the targeted genes screen. 7. Characterizing the genomic and transcriptomic status of cancer related genes in metastatic lesions (local recurrence, positive lymph node or distant metastatic sites) from the same multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer patients in order to evaluate the consequence of genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity of multifocal lesions on metastatic lesions. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic choice. This project has the potential to identify genetic/transcriptomic differences existing between several lesions constituting multifocal breast cancers, which in the routine clinical practice are usually considered to be homogeneous among them. We foresee validating significant results in a larger series of patients and this, in turn, could have a remarkable impact on the treatment and clinical management of multifocal breast cancers. Indeed, we hope to provide some evidence whether or not each focus matters in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer to define the adequate therapeutic approach, especially in the context of targeted therapies. The work to be done at Sanger will be target gene screen pooling of 1400 samples.

  Dataset EGAD00001000624