15041 results for "cancer studies using rna-seq"

in 15.44 milliseconds.

• RNA sequencing of undifferentiated sarcomas

  Dac EGAC00001001055

• Human Biofluid RNA Atlas DAC

  Dac EGAC00001001338

• Effective screening strategy for deafness using a new-genetation sequencing platform: a consecutive analysis

  The diagnosis of the genetic etiology of deafness contributes to the clinical management of patients. We performed the following four genetic tests in three stages for 52 consecutive deafness subjects in one facility. We used the Invade assay and Sanger sequencing for the GJB2 gene or SLC26A4 gene in the first stage test, TaqMan genotyping assay in second stage test, and targeted exon sequencing using the massively parallel DNA sequencing in third stage test. Overall, we identified the genetic cause in 40% (21/52) of patients. The diagnostic rates of the first-, second- and third-stage genetic testing were 17%(9/52), 9%(4/43) and 21% (8/39), respectively. The combination approach using these genetic tests appears to be useful as a diagnostic tool for deafness patients. We recommended that genetic testing for the screening of common mutations in deafness genes using the Invader assay or TaqMan genotyping assay be performed as the initial evaluation. For the remaining undiagnosed cases, targeted exon sequencing using MPS is clinically and economically beneficial. This data set was MPS reads data (fastq) for 39 sensorineural hearing loss patients.

  Study JGAS000032

• TRACERx NSCLC, multiregion sequencing of the first 100 tumors

  BACKGROUND TRACERx (TRAcking Cancer Evolution through therapy (Rx)) is a prospective cohort study designed to investigate intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) in relation to clinical outcome, and to determine the clonal nature of driver events and evolutionary processes in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Multiregion high-depth whole-exome sequencing (M-seq) was performed on 100 early stage NSCLC tumors resected prior to systemic therapy. A total of 327 tumor regions were sequenced and analyzed to define evolutionary histories, obtain a census of clonal and subclonal events, and assess the relationship between ITH and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Widespread ITH was observed for both somatic copy number alterations (median 48% [0.03-88%]) and mutations (median 30% [0.5-93%]). Driver mutations in EGFR, MET, BRAF and TP53 were almost always clonal. However, heterogeneous driver alterations occurring later in evolution were found in over 75% of tumors and were common in PIK3CA, NF1 and genes involved in chromatin modification and DNA response and repair. Genome doubling and ongoing dynamic chromosomal instability (CIN), illustrated by mirrored subclonal allelic imbalance, were identified as causes of ITH resulting in parallel evolution of driver copy number events, including amplifications of CDK4, FOXA1, and BCL11A. Elevated copy number heterogeneity was associated with shorter RFS (HR=4.9, P=0.00044), which remained significant in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS ITH mediated through CIN, rather than point mutational heterogeneity, was associated with increased risk of relapse, supporting its value as a prognostic predictor, and the need to target this high-risk phenotype.

  Dataset EGAD00001003206

• WTCCC case-control study for Tuberculosis

  WTCCC genome-wide case-control association study for Tuberculosis (TB) using the African samples as controls.

  Study EGAS00000000027

• WES-based association study of cefaclor-induced anaphylaxis

  This study investigates the genetic factors associated with cefaclor-induced anaphylaxis using whole-exome sequencing (WES).

  Study EGAS50000001163

• ESGI___Whole_Genome_Sequencing_of_NSPHS_samples

  Whole genome sequencing of sampels from the NSPHS cohort. The samples are sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X Ten system.

  Study EGAS00001001117

• Longitudinal ctDNA in Uveal Melanoma

  Assess the efficacy of using multi-modal ctDNA analysis to detect relapse in patients with uveal melanoma

  Study EGAS00001006373

• Preeclampsia InterPregGen Consortium: Whole Genome Sequencing of 100 unrelated Uzbeks (DNA samples from the Institute of Immunology, Uzbek Academy of Sciences, Tashkent, Uzbekistan; Republic Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Centre of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan)

  Whole genome sequencing of 100 unrelated Uzbeks in order to impute genotypes into PE cases and controls from Uzbekistan and to provide genetic data and infrastructure for future genetic studies in Uzbekistan and Central Asia more generally and to fill a gap in worldwide information as Central Asia is not adequately represented in available genomic data. This dataset is one component of the InterPregGen FP7 project. DNA samples for this component were collected by InterPregGen Consortium collaborators in Tashkent, Uzbekistan at the Institute of Immunology, Uzbek Academy of Sciences and at the Republic Specialized Scientific Practical Medical Centre of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

  Dataset EGAD00001005466

• Whole-genome and transcriptome versus panel sequencing in precision oncology: A translational-clinical comparison

  Precision oncology offers new cancer treatment options. While the use of whole-genome (WGS) and transcriptome (TS) sequencing remains often confined to specific clinical programs, molecular analysis with gene panels is more common clinical practice. Methods: Twenty patients with rare or advanced tumors sequenced by WGS/TS within the DKFZ/NCT/DKTK-MASTER program from 2015 to 2020 (MASTER 1) were additionally sequenced with the TSO500 DNA and TST170 RNA Assay by Illumina. Original Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) therapy recommendations (TR) were juxtaposed with TR from NGS panel data analysis (comparison 1). To mitigate temporal differences between the two sequencings, WGS/TS was bioinformatically reanalyzed (MASTER 2), and new TR were again compared (comparison 2). Results: In comparison 1, 47.1% of the MASTER 1’s TR and 62.8% of the panel’s TR were identical, as were 45.9% of the TR of MASTER 2 and 54.9% of the panel in comparison 2. In both MASTER 1 and MASTER 2, 26.5% and 36.1% of TR, respectively, relied on Biomarkers (BM) which were not covered by the panel. Eight of the ten MTB-derived therapy implementations were also supported in the panel, the two remaining ones being based on BM absent from the panel. Conclusions: About half of the TR in WGS/TS and panel sequencing were identical. Around a third of TR issued by WGS/TS were based on BM which are not covered by the panel, leading to therapy implementations. The presented data underscores the clinical value of comprehensive molecular analyses in individuals with advanced cancers.

  Study EGAS50000000431