6941 results for "fc coins xbox one Buyfc26coins.com is FC 26 coins official site..hLXt"

in 21.40 milliseconds.

• EGAD00000000114

  Whole transcriptome sequence data from 18 ovarian clear-cell carcinoma samples and one TOV21G ovarian clear-cell carcinoma cell line

  Dataset EGAD00000000114

• exome sequence of female patients suffering from Ovarian Meiotic Defects

  Exome sequencing was performed on 15 unrelated female patients suffering from primary infertility due to Ovarian Meiotic Defects (OMD). Each reference number corresponds to one of the tested subject. DNA was extracted from Saliva using Oragene saliva DNA collection kit (DNAgenotek Inc., Ottawa, Canada).Exome capture was performed with the Agilent V5 kit and sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 2000.

  Dataset EGAD00001004035

• Exome sequencing data

  Exome sequencing fastq files from 6 mutation carriers and 5 non-carriers from 2 families. One µg DNA was used for library preparation using the TruSeq DNA LT Sample Prep Kit v2 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina). Hybridization was performed using Nimblegen SeqCap EZ Exome v3 (Roche) and Paired-end Sequencing (2x100 bp) on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 with TruSeq v3 chemistry (Illumina).

  Dataset EGAD00001003745

• PIK3R4 (VPS15)

  WES of human: A mutation in VPS15 (PIK3R4) causes a ciliopathy and affects IFT20 release from the cis-Golgi WES (Agilent SureSelect All Exon XT2 50 Mb kit) has been realized on three affected siblings (II.1, II.3, II.5) and one healthy sister (II.4). Raw data (BAM files) are provided: - II.1.aligned.sorted.dedup.realign.recal.bam - II.3.aligned.sorted.dedup.realign.recal.bam - II.5.aligned.sorted.dedup.realign.recal.bam - II.4.aligned.sorted.dedup.realign.recal.bam

  Dataset EGAD00001002736

• Whole Exome Sequencing of Mixed Histology Lung Cancer

  We conducted whole-exome sequencing (WES) and microarray profiling on 19 micro-dissected tumor regions of different histologic subtypes from 9 patients with lung cancers of mixed histologic patterns including 6 LUAD, 6 LCNEC, 3 SCLC, 3 LUSC, and one poorly differentiated NSCLC-NOS.

  Dataset EGAD00001007076

• Nuclease deficiencies alter plasma cell-free DNA methylation profiles (Human samples)

  The dataset contains 2x75bp paired-end sequencing data in DNASE1L3-deficient human subjects. We performed bisulfite sequencing of plasma samples from three DNASE1L3-deficient subjects and one heterozygous parent to investigate how nuclease deficiencies alter plasma cell-free DNA methylation profiles.

  Dataset EGAD00001007750

• Long read mRNA sequencing of blood cells exposed to different immune stimuli

  Long-read (PacBio) RNA sequencing dataset of in vitro stimulated PBMC cells. 5 samples consisting of 1 RPMI control and 4 stimulus conditions (lipopolysaccharide (LPS), polyI-polyC, S. aureus and C. albicans) all originating from one donor. Files are raw BAM format files generated by Sequel 2 machine.

  Dataset EGAD00001009998

• From research to data sharing: exploring EGA user's experiences

  The Cell Plasticity and Regeneration Group at the Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL focuses on the process of recruitment of macrophages that takes place in the small intestine during injury and healing. They recently published a paper titled “Mucosal Macrophages Govern Intestinal Regeneration in Response to Injury" in Gastroenterology Journal. As part of the research, some experiments were conducted using human intestinal organoid lines. These cells were processed for RNA sequencing, and the sequencing data were deposited at the EGA to be made available to the scientific community. When dealing with human genomic information, repositories must ensure the availability of the datasets while ensuring data protection. In this context, the European Genome-phenome Archive stands as a service for secure archiving and sharing of genetic, phenotypic and clinical data resulting from biomedical research. Following the recent publication of their paper, we took the opportunity to talk to Ilias Moraitis, first author, and Jordi Guiu, group leader, to find out about their experience with data sharing. Could you explain the focus of your research? In the lab, we study intestinal regeneration and how immune cells participate in this process. We use several techniques: engineered mouse models, image tracing, as well as mouse and human cells intestinal organoids. What challenges do you face regarding data management? We didn’t have a lot of problems. Always the informatic part, the data analysis, can give problems. But everything was smooth and working. We think it’s very important to deposit the data in repositories. For the mouse data it is very straightforward, but for us it was the first time depositing human data, which is sensitive because it comes from patients, and this is legally regulated. That’s why we thought about the EGA, and it was our first time. Why do you think it is important to submit data to repositories such as EGA? Because we think data is important for the science. Nowadays, we are sequencing a lot everywhere worldwide and having these resources shared with the scientific community it’s not only good for science, but it is also saving money and reducing costs. And there is so much data in there that can be used for other projects and for other questions. And it saves time! How was the process of submitting the data to the EGA? The communication worked very well but it was slower than we would like. But I think this is something we learn on the way. People usually wait until the last minute to do this before publication but if you know it in advance, you can start the process earlier. If you had to repeat the process, would you do anything differently? It’s like everything, isn’t it? For the first time you don’t know, you aren’t sure, but for the second time you know the steps, you know what to do and it’s faster. Of course, we would to do it earlier. Also, there were some things related to the control access that we didn’t know how to manage, but it was something more internal to us. Who is going to receive the communications and when, is our ethical committee going to evaluate this? All these technicalities that we didn’t know before starting this process, so we had to think about all these things. Next time it will be faster on our side. Do you have any suggestions for us to improve the submission process? Maybe we’ll need to ask our bioinformatician who did it! He was in charge of this part. Besides that, we think if the process were faster, it would be better for everyone. Also, in science a lot of times you have to do a lot of things at the very last minute, because of the nature of the experiments, or the need to accomplish for submitting a paper. Being faster in the process would be a plus. On your side, we went through the process and were able to find some information, but there were aspects we weren't aware of and weren't sure how to handle. I'm not sure if other institutes have different protocols for managing data requests or how they handle these internally. We believe the main issue lies in how the forms are filled out. Do you have any recommendations for other submitters? The main advice is to do this with enough time. Submit the data when you have the sequences, and don’t wait until the last minute. And then it can be under embargo, so you don’t need to make it public at that moment. As soon as you sequence, upload it and then it will be there for whenever you need to publish. How do you think we could encourage other researchers to submit their data? There are different layers here. One is that it is mandatory. You have to do this. The other is that we belong to a research community, to the same community and sharing this is making our research community stronger and more efficient. And then, also because this gives you visibility. The data is there, other people can analyse your data, and this also will bring citations to your papers. It has many advantages.

  Blog from-research-to-data-sharing

• Genetic Diseases of Immune Homeostasis and Autoimmunity Caused by GIMAP Deficiency

  We investigated 17 affected individuals in 9 kindreds with lymphopenia, splenomegaly, liver disease, thrombocytopenia, lymphadenopathy, severe recurrent lung infections, skin diseases, and lymphoma. Whole-exome sequencing of the cohort revealed mutations in GIMAP5. We also found another patient from one kindred with a unique mutation in the gene GIMAP6, discovered by whole-exome sequencing. A comprehensive investigation of this gene mutation through in vivo and in vitro experiments revealed that GIMAP6 deficiency results in defects in autophagy in patient T cells and interruption of GIMAP7 and GABARAPL2 interactions. GIMAP6 deficiency leads to affected patients to present with clinical phenotypes such as recurrent infections, lymphoproliferation, autoimmunity, and inflammation.

  Study phs002816

• Lysosomal Disease Network (LDN6719) Immune Response to Intrathecal Enzyme Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidosis 1 Patients

  In this study we characterized the immune response to intrathecal (IT) recombinant human alpha-L-iduronidase (rhIDU) in mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I) subjects with spinal cord compression who had been previously treated with intravenous rhIDU. Concentrations of specific antibodies and cytokines were measured in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected before monthly IT rhIDU infusions. These serologic findings were compared with clinical adverse event (AE) reports to establish temporal correlations with clinical symptoms. We found that IT rhIDU was generally well tolerated in the subjects studied although one subject had moderate to severe clinical symptoms and serologic abnormalities consistent with an immune response.

  Study phs000862