The cold pressor test (CPT) is a widely used pain provocation test to investigate both pain tolerance and cardiovascular responses. Twenty-two females were phenotypically assessed before and after a CPT, and blood samples were taken for RNA-sequencing. Files were processed and quantified with kallisto v0.42.5 using the human reference transcriptome (Gencode Release 28). Countdata was rlog-transformed.
This data set includes RNAseq from 38 follicular lymphoma tumours. All tumours were fresh frozen. Libraries were constructed by enriching for poly-A transcripts and sequenced as 75bp paired end reads on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument.
Paired RNA sequencing of 30 samples RRMM using Illumina TruSeq stranded mRNA kit and either HiSeq2000 or HiSeq X Ten for sequencing.
Data from NABUCCO cohort 2 (NCT03387761). This dataset includes Whole exome DNA sequencing on bladder tumor samples matched with blood samples for patients from NABUCCO Cohort 2 (Cohort 2A and Cohort 2B). The data is pre-treatment
This data set includes RNAseq from 77 follicular lymphoma tumours. All tumours were fresh frozen. Libraries were constructed by enriching for poly-A transcripts and sequenced as 75bp paired end reads on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument.
Short read whole genome sequencing analysis of the off target effect after Prime editing in IPSC line KCNQ2 R201C. Comparison of parental KCNQ2 R201C with two corrected clonal lines (3samples in total). Dataset contains CRAM files and VCF files for the respective samples.
bulk RNAseq was conducted on highly purified CD45 - CD71 - CD235a - CD31 - CD271 + BMSCs isolated from a cohort of newly diagnosed 62 AML patients, uniformly treated within an intensive chemotherapy clinical trial and selected to represent the mutational landscape of AML
10x genomics single-cell RNAseq of an isogenic human iPSC model for SMA and control. The transcriptomic analysis was performed at 3 timepoints, day 4, day 20 and day 40. The analysis of this dataset was reported in the manuscript "An isogenic human iPSC model unravels neurodevelopmental abnormalities in SMA" from Grass et al.:
Whole genome sequencing of 288 single-cell-derived blood colonies from 3 individuals with splicing factor-mutated clonal hematopoiesis.
Accessing Data Please refer to “Authorized Access” below regarding accessing data through the BioData Catalyst ecosystem. The data from this accession is not available for download through dbGaP. Objective To compare the effects of amiodarone, lidocaine, and placebo on survival to hospital discharge after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Background Ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) are common causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but are considered the most responsive to shock and therefore the most treatable. Nonetheless, most defibrillation attempts do not result in sustained return of spontaneous circulation, and VF or VT may persist or recur after shock. There is also evidence that longer durations of VF or VT are associated with decreases in the likelihood of resuscitation. Amiodarone and lidocaine are commonly used to promote successful defibrillation of shock-refractory VF or VT and prevent recurrences. Previous trials have shown amiodarone to be more effective than placebo or lidocaine for return of spontaneous circulation and survival at hospital admittance. This study sought to further extend the research and examine whether amiodarone would improve survival to hospital discharge and neurologic outcomes, as compared to placebo or lidocaine. Participants 3,026 eligible participants were enrolled, with 974 assigned to amiodarone, 993 assigned to lidocaine, and 1,059 assigned to placebo. An additional 1,627 participants that received a study intervention, but did not meet eligibility criteria, were included in analysis of the intention-to-treat population. Design The study interventions (amiodarone, lidocaine, and saline) were packaged in indistinguishable sealed kits and randomly distributed in to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers in a 1:1:1 ratio, stratified by participating site and agency. Each kit contained three syringes, and each syringe held 3 ml of colorless fluid containing 150 mg of amiodarone, 60 mg of lidocaine, or normal saline. Participants with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were treated in accordance with local EMS protocols, in compliance with American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines. If VF or VT persisted or recurred after one or more shocks, eligible participants received a vasopressor and the masked kit containing amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo. Approximating current clinical practice, the initial dose consisted of two syringes administered by rapid bolus. If the estimated body weight of the patient was less than 100 lbs., then one syringe was used. If VF or VT persisted, standard resuscitation measures, additional shocks, and an additional syringe of the study drug were administered. At that point the trial interventions were completed and standard interventions for advanced life support were employed. Upon arrival at the hospital, providers were notified of the patient's enrollment in the trial and encouraged to provide usual care in accordance with AHA guidelines, including open-label amiodarone or lidocaine if necessary. Components of hospital care were monitored but not standardized by the trial protocol. Participants, providers, and trial personnel were blinded to the trial drug assignments, with the exception of treating physicians if emergency un-blinding was required for care. Data from pre-hospital patient care records, CPR process measures, and hospital medical records were collected. The primary outcome of the trial was survival to hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was survival with favorable neurologic status at discharge, defined as a score on the modified Rankin scale of 3 or less. Conclusions Neither amiodarone nor lidocaine resulted in a significantly higher rate of survival to hospital discharge or favorable neurologic outcome, as compared to placebo, among participants with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to initial shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia.
