4809 results for "*oma"

in 87.96 milliseconds.

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic breast carcinoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic breast carcinoma patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004632

• Esophageal adenocarcinoma plasma cfDNA samples - PERFECT cohort and nCRT cohort

  The dataset contains 295 plasma cfDNA samples from various stages of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma from the PERFECT cohort and the nCRT cohort. Shallow WGS was performed on an Illumina Novaseq S4 PE150bp. Samples are provided as raw reads without any prior processing.

  Dataset EGAD00001008316

• DLP+ Single Cell Genomic Library A98297

  DLP+ Single Cell Genomic Library A98297 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR3_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010248

• RNAseq of patients with Ewings sarcoma

  Cancer is driven my mutations in the genome. We will uncover the mutations that give rise to Ewing's sarcoma, a bone tumour that largely affects children. We will use second generation Illumina massively parallel sequencing, and bespoke software, to characterise the genomes and transcriptomes of Ewing's sarcoma tumours.

  Dataset EGAD00001000444

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a follicular lymphoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a follicular lymphoma patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004611

• Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) for St. Jude High Grade Glioma (HGG) study

  Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) for St. Jude High Grade Glioma (HGG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001000807

• WGS files for CIC paper data

  WGS files for CIC paper titled "Malignant progression of an ancestral bone marrow clone harboring a CIC-NUTM2A fusion in isolated myeloid sarcoma"

  Dataset EGAD00001009787

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a double-hit lymphoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a double-hit lymphoma patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004624

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic renal carcinoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic renal carcinoma patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004633

• WES Melanoma subtypes

  The dataset include sequencing data from 23 patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma. The 23 metastatic melanoma subtypes consisted of cutaneous melanoma (CM, n=10); head and neck melanoma (HNM, n=7); uveal melanoma (UM, n=4); acral lentiginous (AM, n=1) and mucosal melanoma (MM, n=1).

  Dataset EGAD00001008336

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a cholangiocarcinoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a cholangiocarcinoma patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004649

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004668

• Institut Curie Neuroblastoma Whole Genome Sequencing Diagnosis Relapse

  Neuroblastoma, a clinically heterogeneous pediatric cancer, is characterized by distinct genomic profiles but few recurrent mutations. As neuroblastoma is expected to have high degree of genetic heterogeneity, study of neuroblastoma's clonal evolution with deep coverage whole-genome sequencing of diagnosis and relapse samples will lead to a better understanding of the molecular events associated with relapse. Samples were included in this study if sufficient DNA from constitutional, diagnosis and relapse tumors was available for WGS. Whole genome sequencing was performed on trios (constitutional, diagnose and relapse DNA) from eight patients using Illumina Hi-seq2500 leading to paired-ends (PE) 90x90 for 6 of them and 100x100 for two. Expected coverage for sample NB0175 100x100bp was 30X for tumor and constitutional samples. For the seven other patients expected coverage was 80X for tumor samples with PE 100x100, 100X in the other tumor samples and 50X for all constitutional samples (see table 1). Following alignment with BWA (Li et al., Oxford J, 2009 Jul) allowing up to 4% of mismatches, bam files were cleaned up according to the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) recommendations (Van der Auwera et al., Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 2013, picard-1.45, GenomeAnalysisTK-2.2-16). Variant calling was performed in parallel using 3 variant callers: GenomeAnalysisTK-2.2-16, Samtools-0.1.18 and MuTect-1.1.4 (McKenna et al., Genome Res, 2010; Li et al., Oxford J, 2009 Aug; Cibulskis et al., Nature, 2013). Annovar-v2012-10-23 with cosmic-v64 and dbsnp-v137 were used for the annotation and RefSeq for the structural annotation. For GATK and Samtools, single nucleotide variants (SNVs) with a quality under 30, a depth of coverage under 6 or with less than 2 reads supporting the variant were filter out. MuTect with parameters following GATK and Samtools thresholds have been used to filter our irrelevant variants. .SNVs within and around exons of coding genes overlapping splice sites.. Then,variants reported in more than 1% of the population in the 1000 genomes (1000gAprl_2012) or Exome Sequencing Project (ESP6500) have been discarded in order to filter polymorphisms. Finally, synonymous variants were filtered out. MuTect focuses on somatic by filtering with constitutional sample. Mpileup comparison between constitutional and somatic DNAs allowed us to focus also on tumor specific SNVs with GATK and Samtools. Finally, every SNV called by our pipeline and also supported in any constitutional samples were filtered our in order to prevent putative constitutional DNA coverage deficiency. Then we analyzed CNVs (copy number variants) with HMMcopy-v0.1.1 (Gavin et al., Genome Res, 2012) and control-FREEC-v6.7 (Boeva et al., Bioinformatics 2011) with a respective window of 2000bp and 1000 bp, and auto-correction of normal contamination of tumor samples for Control-FREEC. Finally we explored Structural variants (SVs) including deletions, inversions, tandem duplications and translocations using DELLY-v0.5.5 with standard parameters (Rausch et al., Oxford J, 2012). In tumors, at least 10 supporting reads were required to make a call and 5 supporting reads for the sample NB0175 with a coverage of only 40X (see table 2). To predict SVs in constitutional samples for subsequent somatic filtering, only 2 supporting reads were required in order not to miss one. To identify somatic events, all the SVs in each normal sample were first flanked by 500 bp in both directions and any SVs called in a tumor sample which was in the combined flanked regions of respective normal sample was removed (see graph 1). Deletions with more than 5 genes impacted or larger than 1Mb and inversions or tandem duplications covering more than 4 genes, were removed. We focused on exonic and splicing events for deletions, inversions, and tandem duplications. For translocation, we keep all SVs that occurred in intronic, exonic, 5'UTR, upstream or splicing regions. Bioinformatics detection of variations with Deep sequencing approach Once PE reads merged and adaptors trimmed by SeqPrep with default parameters, merged reads were aligned via the BWA (Li H. and Durbin R. 2009 PMID 19451168) allowing up to 1 differences in the 22-base-long seeds and reporting only unique alignments. Only reads having a mapping quality 20 or more have been further analysed. Variant calling software was not used, since we aimed to predict variations at low frequencies, observed in less than 1% of reads. Such variants require a custom approach. Using DepthOfCoverage functions of the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v2.13.2 (McKenna A, et al., 2010 Genome Research PMID: 20644199), we focused on high quality coverage of bases A, C, G and T at the targeted variant position. Depth of coverage of each base following a mapping quality higher than 20 and a base quality higher than 10 have been taken into account in order to focus only on high quality data. Aiming to determine the background level of variability at the studied regions, 10 control samples were included in the analysis. The same approach and filtering criteria have been applied as introduced above over the entire amplicons. In order to highlight variants, for each sample the frequencies of each bases at each amplicon position were then compared to those observed in the set of controls. Statistical analyses were performed with the R statistical software (http://www.R-project.org). Fisher’s exact two-sided tests with a Bonferroni correction were performed to compare percentages of bases between the data sets, i.e. for a given base between a case and the controls. Finally, significant variations were filtered-in once (i) a significant increase in the percentage of avariant base and (ii) a significant decrease in the percentage of it's reference base following our p.values criteria was observed (p.val < 0.05).

  Dataset EGAD00001001356

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004680

• Targeted DNA sequencing dataset for the study "Molecular profiling of EBV associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma"

  We performed deep targeted DNA sequencing with a panel of 74 selected cancer-related genes previously identified to be recurrently mutated in EBV associated DLBCL. Sequencing was performed on a HiSeq platform (Illumina) with 250 bp paired-end reads. There are 68 FFPE samples in this targetedDNAseq-dataset with 46 unpaired tumors and 22 normals used as a panel of normals.

  Dataset EGAD00001009396

• RNA-seq data from 27 glioblastoma samples

  27 Fresh frozen tissue specimens were crushed by mortar and pestle, homogenized using the QIAShredder kit (Qiagen), and genomic DNA and total RNA were extracted using the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA libraries were synthesized using 200 ng of total RNA using the Ilumina TruSeq Stranded RNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina), and subsequently sequenced on the NextSeq550 platform to a read depth of 80 million clusters and 160 million paired end reads (75 bp X 75 bp) using V2 chemistry.

  Dataset EGAD00001008362

• RNAseq - Discovery of resistance mechanisms to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in metastatic BRAF mutant melanoma

  We propose to biopsy 20 consented BRAF mutant melanoma patients at Addenbrooke's Hospital pre-treatment with vemurafenib and also upon the development of resistant disease, with the aim of using exome sequence and SNP6 data to identify novel sequence variants and copy number alterations that can be used to validate observed resistance mechanisms in our cell line models and also to use these models to inform as to likely candidate small molecule inhibitors to overcome resistance and that could be tested in the clinical trial setting.

  Dataset EGAD00001001050

• Chondromyxoid fibroma

  Chondromxoid fibroma is a benign tumour of bone with unknown underlying pathogenesis. To determine pathognomic genomic event in chondromyxoid fibroma whole genome sequencing will be undertaken to reconstruct rearrangements and find underlying mutations.

  Dataset EGAD00001001063

• Single Cell Genome Sequence for DLP+ library A118804A

  Single Cell Genome Sequence for high grade serous ovarian carcinoma patient-derived xenograft SA1162B passage 1, patient-derived xenograft SA1096B passage 1 on DLP+ library A118804A

  Dataset EGAD00001009439

• Single Cell Genome Sequence for DLP+ library A118812B

  Single Cell Genome Sequence for high grade serous ovarian carcinoma patient-derived xenograft SA1180C passage 1 on DLP+ library A118812B

  Dataset EGAD00001009442

• Characterization of individual foci of multicentric/multifocal breast cancer using targeted next generation sequencing

  Multifocality or multicentricity in breast cancer may be defined as the presence of two or more tumor foci within a single quadrant of the breast or within different quadrants of the same breast, respectively. This original classification of the breast cancer as multicentric or multifocal was based on the assumption that cancers arising in the same quadrant were more likely to arise from the same ductal structures than those occurring in separate areas of the breast. The problem with these definitions is that the ?quadrants? of the breast are arbitrary external designations, as no internal boundaries do exist. This project will therefore focus both on synchronous multifocal and multicentric tumors. The incidence of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers was reported to be between 13 and 75% depending on the definition used, the extent of the pathologic sampling of the breast and whether in situ disease is considered evidence of multicentricity (1). Although this incidence is variable, those figures show that it is a frequent phenomenon. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic management of the cancer. Multifocality or multicentricity has been associated with a number of more aggressive features including an increased rate of regional lymph node metastases and adverse patient outcome when compared with unifocal tumors (2-3), and a possible increased risk of local recurrence following breast conserving surgery (4). For the moment, the literature is divided on whether there is a corresponding impact on survival outcomes. Today, the current convention to stage and to treat multifocal and multicentric tumors is the classical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging guidelines with which tumor size is assessed by the largest tumor focus without taking other foci of disease into consideration. If some papers, as the recent one from Lynch and colleagues, support the current staging convention (3), others, however, as Boyages et al. suggested that aggregate size and not the size of the largest lesion should be considered in order to refine the prognostic assessment of those tumors (5). On the top of that, the question whether multifocal/multicentric carcinomas are due to the spread of a single carcinoma throughout the breast or is due to multiple carcinomas arising simultaneously has been a matter of debate. Some studies suggested that multifocal breast cancer may result from either intramammary spread from a single primary tumor or multiple synchronous primary tumors; whereas others suggest that multiple breast carcinomas always arise from the same clone (6-8). Recently, Pietri and colleagues analyzed the biological characterization of a series of 113 multifocal/multicentric breast cancers (8) which were diagnosed over a 5-year period. The expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors, Ki-67 proliferative index, expression of HER2 and tumor grading were prospectively determined in each tumor focus, and mismatches among foci were recorded. Mismatches in ER status were present in 5 (4.4%) cases and PgR in 18 (15.9%) cases. Mismatches in tumor grading were present in 21 cases (18.6%), proliferative index (Ki-67) in 17 (15%) cases and HER2 status in 11 (9.7%) cases. Interestingly, this heterogeneity among foci has led to 14 (12.4%) patients receiving different adjuvant treatments compared with what would have been indicated if we had only taken into account the biologic status of the primary tumor. This study therefore showed that differences in biological characteristics of multifocal/multicentric lesions play a crucial role in the adjuvant treatment decision making process. In this study, we will concentrate on a larger series of patients with multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer lesions. We aim at: 1. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality according to the different breast cancer molecular subtypes (ER-/HER2-, HER2+, ER+/HER2-). 2. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality in patients with hereditary breast cancer disease (presence of germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations). Moreover, we would like to investigate if multifocal lesions with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations exhibit a characteristic combination of substitution mutation signatures and a distinctive profile of deletions as demonstrated recently by Nik-Zainal and colleagues (9). 3. Correlating multifocality with clinical information in order to define its influence on patients? survival (DFS and OS). 4. Carrying high coverage targeted gene sequencing of driver cancer genes and genes whose mutation is of therapeutic importance in order to compare clinically-relevant genetic differences between several multifocal breast cancer lesions. 5. Evaluating the impact of the distance between the different lesions on the clinical outcome but also on the genetic differences. 6. Comparing gene expression patterns between several multifocal breast cancer lesions and correlate them with the results of the targeted genes screen. 7. Characterizing the genomic and transcriptomic status of cancer related genes in metastatic lesions (local recurrence, positive lymph node or distant metastatic sites) from the same multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer patients in order to evaluate the consequence of genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity of multifocal lesions on metastatic lesions. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic choice. This project has the potential to identify genetic/transcriptomic differences existing between several lesions constituting multifocal breast cancers, which in the routine clinical practice are usually considered to be homogeneous among them. We foresee validating significant results in a larger series of patients and this, in turn, could have a remarkable impact on the treatment and clinical management of multifocal breast cancers. Indeed, we hope to provide some evidence whether or not each focus matters in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer to define the adequate therapeutic approach, especially in the context of targeted therapies. The work to be done at Sanger will be target gene screen pooling of 1400 samples.

  Dataset EGAD00001000624

• Single Cell Genome Sequence for DLP+ library A96190B

  Single Cell Genome Sequence for high grade serous ovarian carcinoma patient-derived xenograft SA1051A passage 1 on DLP+ library A96190B

  Dataset EGAD00001009466

• Single Cell Genome Sequence for DLP+ library A96207B

  Single Cell Genome Sequence for high grade serous ovarian carcinoma patient-derived xenograft SA1052B passage 1 on DLP+ library A96207B

  Dataset EGAD00001009474

• Single Cell Genome Sequence for DLP+ library A96210B

  Single Cell Genome Sequence for high grade serous ovarian carcinoma patient SA1047B on DLP+ library A96210B

  Dataset EGAD00001009475

• Transcriptome and Exome from longitudinal samples of human glioblastoma (newly added after 2015)

  We expanded our previous collection of longitudinal GBM patients (EGAS00001001041) by recruiting 21 additional patients. Tumor specimens were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (16 of 21 cases, with the matched normal/blood) and transcriptome sequencing (16 of 21 cases).

  Dataset EGAD00001002143