5496 results for "*oma"

in 21.84 milliseconds.

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a sinus adenocarcinoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a sinus adenocarcinoma patient,generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001003737

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a Ewing sarcoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a Ewing sarcoma patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001003738

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from an adenocarcinoma of the lung patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from an adenocarcinoma of the lung patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001003742

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patient,generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001003744

• Highly differentiated, fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma.

  Sequencing was performed using OncoPanel v.2 (OPv2), an Agilent SureSelect custom designed bait set consisting of the coding regions of 504 genes, previously linked to human cancer. Sequencing wa sperformed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500. 14 highly differentiated, fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma tumor samples, and 8 non-matched normal skeletal muscle samples weer sequenced. BAM files are available for download.

  Dataset EGAD00001003746

• Whole genome sequencing data of normal/tumors pairs from 9 patients with uterine or ovarian carcinosarcoma.

  This dataset provides whole genome sequencing data of normal/tumors pairs from 9 patients with uterine or ovarian carcinosarcoma using the HiSeq 2000 sequencing system. It includes 27 samples (9 normals, 16 uterine tumors and 2 ovarian tumors). Through separate whole genome sequencing of carcinomatous and sarcomatoid components, we analyse and compare the genomic alterations of these components.

  Dataset EGAD00001003755

• Whole genome shotgun sequencing and somatic mutations data in Hepatocellular carcinoma

  There are 88 paired samples from HCC patients including tumors and matched adjacent normal tissues which were sequencing by Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform.

  Dataset EGAD00001003760

• Strand-specific RNA Sequencing of initial and recurrent gliomas

  Four RNA-sequencing datasets from two patients with initial low-grade glioma and copy number alteration at IDH1 upon recurrence. Data is provided as bam files.

  Dataset EGAD00001003764

• Whole-exome sequencing of 20 samples of actinic keratosis (10s) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (10s)

  Whole-exome sequencing of 20 samples of actinic keratosis (10) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (10) was performed to investigate a potential relationship between DNA methylation-based subtypes and genetic mutation patterns. 7 samples were shown to belong to the stem cell-like subclass (4 AK and 2 SCC), 12 - to the keratinocyte-like subtype (6 AK and 6 SCC) and one SCC sample is unclassified (was not included in the methylation analysis). Exome regions were captured using Agilent Low Input Exome-Seq Human v5 kit and sequenced on Illumina Hiseq4000 with paired-end 100-nucleotide reads.

  Dataset EGAD00001003765

• Deciphering the genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic landscapes of pre-invasive lung cancer lesions to determine prognosis

  Background: Lung carcinoma-in-situ (CIS) lesions are the pre-invasive precursor to lung squamous cell carcinoma. However, only half progress to invasive cancer in three years, while a third spontaneously regress. Whether modern molecular profiling techniques can identify those pre-invasive lesions that will subsequently progress and distinguish them from those that will regress is unknown. Methods: Progressive and regressive CIS lesions were laser-captured and their genome, epigenome and transcriptome interrogated. We analysed 83 progressive lesions, 41 regressive and 33 normal epithelial control samples. DNA methylation and gene expression profiles were further validated using publicly available lung cancer data. Results: Somatic mutation burden was higher in progressive lesions than regressive CIS lesions, across base substitutions, rearrangements, and copy number changes. Driver mutations were present in both progressive and regressive CIS lesions, but were more numerous in progressive cases. Progressive and regressive CIS lesions had distinct epigenomic and transcriptional profiles, with a strong chromosomal instability signature. Gene expression, methylation and copy number profiles can all predict accurately which CIS lesions will progress to lung cancer. Conclusion: Pre-invasive CIS lesions that will subsequently progress to invasive lung cancer can be distinguished from those that will regress using molecular profiling. Progression is associated with a strong chromosomal instability signature. These findings inform the development of novel therapeutic targets.

  Dataset EGAD00001003883