4955 results for "*oma"

in 66.91 milliseconds.

• Immune profiling reveals enrichment of distinct immune signatures in oral epithelial dysplasia

  The dataset contains transcriptomic information of 36 oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD), 14 fibroepithelial polyps (FEP), and 6 early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) from the Asian population. Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. RNA libraries were prepared using the NEB NextUltra RNA kit with Illumina Ribo-Zero rRNA removal as per manufacturer’s instructions. RNA sequencing was performed on the HiSeq2500 platform to generate paired-end 150 nucleotides reads and with a coverage of 50 million reads per sample. Uploaded bam files have been mapped to the GRCh38 human genome using TopHat2. Clinical and demographic data for these patients are available from the associated publications or by request.

  Dataset EGAD00001007970

• Clinical Outcomes by Tumor Mutational Burden and Inflammatory Gene Expression With Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Advanced Melanoma_CM67-RNASeq

  Purpose Exploratory analyses of CheckMate 066 and 067 trials were conducted to investigate associations of tumor mutational burden (TMB), a 4-gene inflammatory gene expression signature, and BRAF mutation status with tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma. Patients and Methods Patients with known programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and BRAF mutation status received nivolumab (NIVO) or dacarbazine in CheckMate 066 and either NIVO, ipilimumab (IPI), or NIVO+IPI in CheckMate 067. Whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing were used to determine TMB and inflammatory gene expression signature scores, respectively. These biomarkers were evaluated in terms of their association with PFS and OS. Results In the NIVO, NIVO+IPI, and IPI arms of CheckMate 067, longer survival was associated with high (> median) versus low (≤ median) TMB with hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for PFS of 0.45 (0.30–0.65), 0.55 (0.38–0.81), and 0.60 (0.43–0.82), and for OS of 0.46 (0.30–0.71), 0.53 (0.34–0.82), and 0.52 (0.36–0.74), respectively. For NIVO-treated patients, these results were confirmed in CheckMate 066. A survival benefit was observed with high TMB and absence of BRAF mutation. Survival was associated with high versus low inflammatory signature scores with HRs (95% CI) for PFS of 0.56 (0.34–0.94), 0.40 (0.23–0.72), and 0.43 (0.27–0.70), and for OS of 0.37 (0.20–0.66), 0.38 (0.19–0.74), and 0.46 (0.27–0.79), in the NIVO, NIVO+IPI, and IPI arms, respectively. Weak correlations were observed between PD-L1, TMB, and the inflammatory signature. Conclusions Combined assessment of TMB, inflammatory gene expression signature, and BRAF mutation status may be predictive for response to immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.

  Dataset EGAD00001006306

• Clinical Outcomes by Tumor Mutational Burden and Inflammatory Gene Expression With Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Advanced Melanoma - CM066-WES

  Purpose Exploratory analyses of CheckMate 066 and 067 trials were conducted to investigate associations of tumor mutational burden (TMB), a 4-gene inflammatory gene expression signature, and BRAF mutation status with tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma. Patients and Methods Patients with known programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and BRAF mutation status received nivolumab (NIVO) or dacarbazine in CheckMate 066 and either NIVO, ipilimumab (IPI), or NIVO+IPI in CheckMate 067. Whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing were used to determine TMB and inflammatory gene expression signature scores, respectively. These biomarkers were evaluated in terms of their association with PFS and OS. Results In the NIVO, NIVO+IPI, and IPI arms of CheckMate 067, longer survival was associated with high (> median) versus low (≤ median) TMB with hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for PFS of 0.45 (0.30–0.65), 0.55 (0.38–0.81), and 0.60 (0.43–0.82), and for OS of 0.46 (0.30–0.71), 0.53 (0.34–0.82), and 0.52 (0.36–0.74), respectively. For NIVO-treated patients, these results were confirmed in CheckMate 066. A survival benefit was observed with high TMB and absence of BRAF mutation. Survival was associated with high versus low inflammatory signature scores with HRs (95% CI) for PFS of 0.56 (0.34–0.94), 0.40 (0.23–0.72), and 0.43 (0.27–0.70), and for OS of 0.37 (0.20–0.66), 0.38 (0.19–0.74), and 0.46 (0.27–0.79), in the NIVO, NIVO+IPI, and IPI arms, respectively. Weak correlations were observed between PD-L1, TMB, and the inflammatory signature. Conclusions Combined assessment of TMB, inflammatory gene expression signature, and BRAF mutation status may be predictive for response to immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.

  Dataset EGAD00001006309

• SF11940

  SF11940 snATAC Sequencing.Anaplastic Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant. Tumor location: Left Frontal. Age: 29. Sex: Male .

  Dataset EGAD00001006311

• SF10679

  SF10679 snATAC Seq. Oligodendroglioma, Anaplastic (WHO gr. 3). Tumor Location: Frontal Age: 43. Sex: Male.

  Dataset EGAD00001006312

• SF11310

  SF11310 Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant.Tumor Location: Frontal. Age:22. Sex: Female

  Dataset EGAD00001006313

• SF12374

  SF12374 snATAC Oligodendroglioma. Tumor Location: Right frontal. Age: 33. Sex: Male.

  Dataset EGAD00001006315

• SF10619

  SF10619 snATAC Oligodendroglioma (WHO gr. 2).Tumor Location: Parietal. Age: 52. Sex: Male

  Dataset EGAD00001006316

• SF4007

  SF4007 snATAC Seq. Oligodendroglioma (WHO gr. 2) Tumor Location: Left frontotemporal. Age:33. Sex: Female.

  Dataset EGAD00001006317

• SF10207

  SF10207 snATAC Seq. Oligodendroglioma, Anaplastic (WHO gr. 3). Tumor Location:Frontal. Age:43. Sex: Male

  Dataset EGAD00001006319