14982 results for "cancer studies using rna-seq"

in 15.66 milliseconds.

• SCLC study George et al. - RNA-sequencing data set

  RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed with RNA extracted from fresh-frozen human tumor tissue samples. cDNA libraries were prepared from poly-A selected RNA applying the Illumina TruSeq protocol for mRNA. The libraries were then sequenced with a 2 x 100bp paired-end protocol to a minimum mean coverage of 30x of the annotated transcriptome.

  Dataset EGAD00001001244

• ChIP-seq in colorectal cancer and paired adjacent normal mucosa

  This dataset includes ChIP-seq data for H3K27ac and H3K4me1 on 20 paired samples of colorectal cancer and adjacent normal mucosa. One tumor sample that failed QC is not available.

  Dataset EGAD00001007707

• Contribution of systemic and somatic factors to clinical response and resistance in urothelial cancer: an exploratory multi-omic analysis

  Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (n=29) were treated with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1). All 29 patients had T-cell receptor sequencing (TCR-seq) of the pre-treatment blood; 24 also had TCR-seq on at least one post-treatment blood sample. 24 patients had TCR-seq of their pre-treatment tumors. TCR-seq data can be found at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546110. 26 patients also had RNAseq of their tumors and whole exome sequencing (WES) of their tumors and matched normal blood. WES results for one sample were excluded from our analysis after failing to meet coverage requirements.

  Study phs001743

• RNA-seq datatset of primary human thymocyte subsets

  FASTQ-files of RNA-seq experiments of 8 primary human thymocyte subsets, isolated by flow-cytometry (FACS) from neonatal thymus biopsies. All samples were sorted to be negative for the expression of the lineage surface markers CD11c, CD19, CD56, CD141 and CD303 and additionally had the following surface phenotypes: DN1 (CD4-CD8-CD7+CD1a-CD161-CD38-); DN2 (CD4-CD8-CD7+CD1a-CD161-CD38+CD3-TCRab-); DN3 (CD4-CD8-CD7+CD1a+); ISP (CD4+CD8-CD3-TCRab-CD1a+); DPE (CD4+CD8+TCRab-CD69-); DPL (CD4+CD8+TCRab+CD69+); SP4 (CD4+CD8-); SP8 (CD4-CD8+). Samples were sorted from 2-4 pediatric patients undergoing heart surgery.

  Dataset EGAD50000001599

• BLUEPRINT release August 2016, RNA-Seq for CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell, on genome GRCh38

  RNA-Seq data for 6 CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell sample(s). 24 run(s), 6 experiment(s), 6 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2016. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20160816/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002339

• BLUEPRINT release August 2014, RNA-Seq for CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell

  RNA-Seq data for 4 CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell sample(s). 22 run(s), 4 experiment(s), 4 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2014. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001000903

• Transcriptome profiling of three giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) cell lines

  This dataset contains RNA-seq data of giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) cell lines (n=3). Cell lines consist of neoplastic "stromal" cells harboring a heterozygous H3F3A p.G34W mutation. RNA-seq was performed on the BGISEQ-500 platform (PE100) and uploaded data contains fastq files, vcf files, and gene expression values (TPM). Cell lines, data generation, and data analysis are described in the following publication: Venneker et al., Histone deacetylase inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy to eliminate neoplastic “stromal” cells from giant cell tumors of bone, 2022.

  Dataset EGAD00001009074

• Blueprint: A human variation panel of genetic influences on epigenomes and transcriptomes in three immune cell types, (RNA-Seq for CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte, on genome GRCh37)

  RNA-Seq data for 197 CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte sample(s). 197 run(s), 197 experiment(s), 197 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh37. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/blueprint_Epivar/protocols/README_rnaseq_analysis_sanger_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002674

• BLUEPRINT release January 2015, RNA-Seq for CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell

  RNA-Seq data for 5 CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell sample(s). 23 run(s), 5 experiment(s), 5 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT release January 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001001165

• Blueprint: A human variation panel of genetic influences on epigenomes and transcriptomes in three immune cell types, (RNA-Seq for CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell, on genome GRCh37)

  RNA-Seq data for 212 CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell sample(s). 212 run(s), 212 experiment(s), 212 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh37. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/blueprint_Epivar/protocols/README_rnaseq_analysis_sanger_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002671

• BLUEPRINT release August 2015, RNA-Seq for CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell, on genome GRCh38

  RNA-Seq data for 5 CD34-negative, CD41-positive, CD42-positive megakaryocyte cell sample(s). 23 run(s), 5 experiment(s), 5 alignment(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20150820/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20150820

  Dataset EGAD00001001534

• Paired RNA-Seq was performed on 125 samples of low grade pediatric glioma

  Paired RNA-Seq was performed on 125 samples of low grade pediatric glioma. The sequencing was done with Illumina Novaseq 6000 and the Illumina TruSeq stranded mRNA kit.

  Dataset EGAD00001010171

• Epigenome cohort 30 Patient DNA and RNA

  This dataset includes RNA-seq, DNA and Chip-Seq data of samples from our paper.

  Dataset EGAD00001009041

• National Cancer Institute (NCI) Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) of Lung Cancer in Never Smokers

  A genomewide study of lung cancer in never smokers Abstract and specific aims In the United States, lung cancer incidence and mortality rates have been steadily declining over the past decade, following decline in the prevalence of tobacco smoking. However, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death, killing more patients than breast, colon, and prostate cancers combined. Although tobacco smoke is the predominant risk factor for development of lung cancer, some patients develop the disease without a history of tobacco smoking. About 10 - 15% of all lung cancers occur in lilfetime never smokers. This figure will increase as the proportion of never smokers increases in the population. Even at present rates, lung cancer in never smokers, if considered a separate disease, is 6th to 8th top cause of cancer death. The growing number of never smokers in the USA and other countries emphasizes the importance of understanding the epidemiology and biology underlying lung cancer in this group. Genetic polymorphisms associated with the risk of lung cancer in never smokers are expected to overlap with those associated with the risk of lung cancer in ever smokers only partially. Epidemiological, molecular and clinical data suggest that molecular mechanisms of LC may differ in smokers and non-smokers, implying that lung cancer in never smokers is a different disease compared to the lung cancer in smokers. One can expect that there should be stronger genetic component in the control lung cancer in never smokers because effects of the genetic factors in never smokers are unmasked by the lack of tobacco smoke exposure. The genetic epidemiology of lung cancer in never smokers has not been well explored, largely because of difficulties in accruing the needed sample size for association studies. We propose a multicenter (total 14 sites from the US and Europe) genomewide association study of lung cancer in never smokers with the following specific aims: Aim 1: To identify candidate SNPs influencing risk for lung cancer in never smokers using Discovery sample. In the Discovery phase we will genotype 1256 Caucasian cases and 1365 age- and gender-matched never smoker controls using the Illumina Human660W-Quad platform. In addition, we will include in the analysis 284 cases and 175 matched controls already genotyped on the 610Quad platform. In this phase we will only include the study sites that have collected blood specimens (MDACC, Mayo Clinic, Karmanos Cancer Institute, The University of Liverpool Cancer research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research in Sutton, and Lunenfeld Research Institute in Toronto, Canada). All the samples will be sent to the independent lab for genotyping, to reduce site-specific technical artifacts. The final sample will consist of 1540 cases and 1540 controls matched by study site. Aim 2: To perform the second phase (validation) analysis of significant SNPs identified in aim 1 using an independent set of cases and controls. SNPs associated with risk at the significance level of 0.01 or below in the discovery set will be included in the replication phase. The proposed threshold guarantees an adequate power to retain SNPs with the typical effect size of 1.3. We plan to carry 6000-7000 SNPs for validation. The independent replication set will include 800 cases and 800 controls, mostly from sites that collected tissue (Mayo Clinic, Karmanos Cancer Institute, UT Southwestern) or buccal specimens (UCLA), but also blood samples (Imperial College London, University of Pennsylvana, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa). We will then perform a joint analysis to test the significance of the SNPs identified in the first stage using a stringent critical p-value of 10-7. There will be 2340 cases and 2340 controls in the joint set. Based on our experience with GWAS in smokers and assuming that genetic component in lung cancer risk in never smokers can be higher than genetic component in smokers, we expect to identify about 5-10 candidate regions associated with lung cancer risk in never smokers. Aim 3: To identify and explore pathways associated with the risk of lung cancer in never smokers. Results of the number of studies on the molecular mechanisms and drug response suggest that lung cancer in never smokers is a different disease and different pathways will be associated with lung cancer risk in non-smokers and smokers. To identify pathways and molecular functions associated with lung cancer risk in never smokers we will apply Ingenuity and DAVID bioinformatics tools. We will use at least 300 top candidate genes identified in joint and discovery analysis. The reason why we select rather large number of candidate genes for functional annotation is two-fold: 1. Both algorithms are looking for enrichment of pathways and function by most significant genes and they produce statistically robust results only when number of genes is relatively high. 2. Despite the fact that this study will be largest possible for never smokers we still are underpowered to detect SNPs with relatively small effect size. But though those SNPs will not reach genome wide level of significance they will tend to be on the top of the list. In other words genes from the gray zone (significant on individual level and non-significant for genome wide level) are expected to be enriched by true discoveries. True discoveries are likely to be associated with limited number of pathways / functions while false positives are expected to be uniformly distributed across functions and pathways. Therefore significant clustering of the gene to a given function will suggest that that those genes are true discoveries. This is the first GWAS aiming at identifying the genetic control of susceptibility to lung cancer in Caucasian never smokers. We will combine the available resources from the multiple sites to achieve the sample size sufficient for this study. The study will identify genetic architecture of the predisposition to the lung cancer in never smokers.

  Study phs000634

• Dataset for cancer_of_unknown_primary-WHOLE_GENOME

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 46 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008869

• A Clone's Genomic Stability as a Biomarker of Its DNA-Damage Resilience

  A main problem in the treatment of advanced cancers, including gastric cancers and glioblastoma, is the incertitude at which we predict how individual patients will respond to DNA-damaging agents, especially on the long run. Knowing the mechanism behind a patient's response, or the lack thereof, will help us depart from the oversimplified “more-is-better” and “one-size-fits-all” principles according to which DNA-damaging agents are administered. This will improve clinical outcome by allowing us to pinpoint those who would respond better and longer to lower doses than to higher doses of DNA-damaging agents. Under the assumption that the success of DNA-damaging therapy increases with the proliferation rate of a relatively homogeneous tumor population, there was little reason to assume anything other than monotonic dose-response relations. With the recent paradigm shift that most cancers are in fact DNA mosaic products of ongoing evolution, comes the urgency to reconsider these fundamental principles behind DNA-damaging therapy administration. As the developers of one of the first DNA deconvolution methods and with access to technologies to profile the transcriptomes of up to 10,000 cells simultaneously, we are equipped to embark on first personalized dose-finding strategies for DNA-damaging therapies. We will test the potential of the very long-term legacy that DNA-damage entails on a cell “genomic instability” as new biomarker of DNA-damage response. Our preliminary studies showed that, for most cancer types, DNA-damaging agents change a clone's genomic instability and that clones succumb to a limit in the amount of genomic instability they can tolerate. In particular, our results showed that patients with intermediate genomic instability have a very poor outcome and that this relation is only evident among treatment-naive patients, but not among patients treated with DNA-damaging agents. Further they show that we can measure genomic instability per clone and that clones with extreme genomic instability typically don't grow large. Our hypothesis that genomic instability, rather than proliferation rate, determines how sensitive a tumor is to DNA-damaging agents on the long-term, is founded on two unexpected findings. Patients with extremely high genomic instability per tumor clone have an exceptionally good outcome. Aim 1 will integrate exome- and single cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) data to characterize clones and to measure how much genomic instability they can tolerate. Low genomic instability is associated with reduced benefit from DNA-damaging agents. Aim 2 will use comet assays and treatment history to quantify DNA damage per clone, relating it to the clones' ability to tolerate DNA damage and to changes in the genomic instability of therapy-surviving clones.

  Study phs003762