12013 results for "coins fc Visit Buyfc26coins.com for latest FC 26 coins news..yU53"

in 16.12 milliseconds.

• H3K27ac/H3K27me3 landscape of medulloblastoma

  We profiled 111 patient medulloblastoma primary tumor samples by bulk RNA-seq (19 samples), 27ac (98 samples) / 27me3 (61 samples) ChIP-Seq, WGS (4 samples) and 27ac hichip (8 samples). Submitted data consists of data generated from previously unpublished tumors as well as complementary data for data sets already published for identical medulloblastoma tumors (ex: 27me3 ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq data submitted for a tumor with publicly available WGS data). The raw fastqs and hg19 aligned RNA-Seq bams are provided.

  Dataset EGAD00001009709

• IntEnd study

  Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from 643 colorectal adenomas collected in different hospitals in Norway, from which DNA was extracted, were analysed for DNA copy number alterations. Some adenomas had more than one block (n=42), thus 643 individuals, 685 blocks. Low-coverage whole genome sequencing was run in all samples. For 529 individuals all the clinical information was available. A subset was matched for follow-up time, age and sex in a nested case-control approach (n=366; cases - individuals who developed later on CRC; controls - individuals who did not develop CRC within the same follow-up time).

  Dataset EGAD00001010119

• CCA ChIP-seq data (63 CCA, 8 normal, 19 cell-line)

  Fastq files for H3K27ac ChIP-seq (with matched input-DNA control) for 63 CCAs, 8 normal bile duct tissues, 16 CCA cell-lines (including replicates), and 3 normal cholangiocyte cell-lines (including replicates). Library prep was performed with the NEBNext ChIP-seq library preparation kit. Each library (including matching input DNA) was sequenced to an average depth of 20 to 30 million raw reads on Illumina HiSeq4000 sequencer, with paired-end sequencing (except for 3 normal bile tissues done with single-end sequencing).

  Dataset EGAD00001012103

• GenomeDenmark Phase 2 - MHC haplotypes

  The MHC vcf call set was generated using a modified AsmVar and BayesTyper pipeline. In contrast to the original pipeline, where variant calling is performed using alignment of collapsed assemblies to a reference genome, the MHC call set was produced using alignment of phased MHC haplotypes. Two iterations of BayesTyper was run, a first iteration for each haplotype seperately and a second iteration performing joint variant calling on all haplotypes. The sample IDs for the fathers and mothers are TrioID-01 and TrioID-02, respectively, and the IDs for the children are TrioID-0x, where x is a number between 3 and 7.

  Dataset EGAD00001003455

• scRNA-Seq & scATAC-Seq Feature-counting Results Derived from 10X Cellrange-arc-count pipeline

  The feature-counting outputs from Cellrange-arc-count pipeline contain information at the single cell level, jointly for both scRNA-Seq and scATAT-Seq on 103 DLBCL samples and 3 normal controls (Please note that sc-40 only has scRNA-Seq data without scATAC-Seq). These files can be used as the input files for further downstream analysis software (e.g. Seurat Package). Moreover, a matrix of single-cell barcodes and associated cell biological types (used in the study) is also provided for users’ reference. This dataset is large and split into two parts to facilitate downloads.

  Dataset EGAD50000002490

• CIDR: NINDS High Throughput Genotyping Resource Access for Structural Hindbrain Disorders

  Recessive forms for many structural brain disorders (SBDs), including cerebellar hypoplasia (CBH), corpus callosum hypoplasia (CCH), cobblestone lissencephaly (COB), classical lissencephaly (LIS), microcephaly (MIC), and pontocerebellar hypoplasia (PCH), have been described. Patients usually present to the clinic with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including autism, epilepsy, intellectual disability, and cerebral palsy. Subsequent brain MRI usually leads to the diagnosis of an SBD. While a handful of genes that cause these diseases have been identified, most patients do not have mutations in these genes, suggesting that there is still much work to be done in identifying the genetic causes of these disorders. We have recruited a cohort of families with inherited SBDs, most from families with documented parental consanguinity with more than one affected member. Current approaches utilizing exome sequencing of SBD affected members still leave most cases unsolved, in part because there are too many possible variants to consider. Linkage analysis will allow us to extract all the useful genetic information from the family, taking advantage of each genetically informative meiosis in each family. We propose to analyze up to 100 SBD families for 500 samples per year for 4 years, through the CIDR SNP Genotyping Service, in parallel with already-funded exome sequencing of affects, leveraging off an already funded Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) effort to identify new causes of SBDs. Understanding the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying recessive pediatric SBDs will lead to better diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities for patients, and may shed light on complex NDDs. Ultimately, this work will identify new genetic disease loci to provide insight into pediatric SBD, with the hope to mitigate the impact of SBD worldwide.Public Health Significance: NDDs affect approximately 4-­6% of the general population, most notably children, and are evident in disorders, such as intellectual disability, epilepsy, and autism, with estimated yearly costs of $51.2B for intellectual disability, $11.5B for cerebral palsy, and $2.5B for visual impairment, making up >5% of total health care costs. Recessive NDDs impose enormous personal, social, and economic costs because of the early onset and the lifetime of medical dependence that often ensues. Genetic testing is critical to the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases. Many of the diseases under study have no treatment or cure. Structural brain diseases (SBDs) underlie a large percentage of these diseases, and are defined loosely as any condition in which defects in the structure or volume of a key brain component. SBDs are divided into major categories based upon the anatomical brain location. The major types involve the anatomical structures of the developing neural tube, forebrain, hindbrain, cerebral cortex, and those affecting overall brain size. For the purposes of this application, we have excluded SBDs resulting from environmental causes (i.e. prematurity-­induced), those below the brainstem, or those unlikely to be due to a germline or de novo mutation (i.e. focal SBDs or simplex disease).

  Study phs002621

• Submitting array based metadata

  Submitting array based metadata For further information please check our Submission FAQs, submission quickguide as well as submission terms! The submission metadata required for Array-based submission must be submitted using EGA programmatic submission and by completing the Array-based format (AF) template. The guidelines for this workflow are described on this page. Please notice that all files should be encrypted and uploaded prior to the processing of your EGA Array-based-Format (AF) template. You can request a legacy EGA submission account (ega-box-XXXX) by populating this form. Please, allow two business days for our Helpdesk team to contact you after populating this form. Please notice that all files should be encrypted and uploaded prior to the processing of your EGA-Array-based-Format (AF) template. Metadata Model Registering Metadata Use the EGA programmatic submission to register your Study, Samples, Data Access Committee (DAC) and Policy. This online interface enables you to create new and edit existing submissions. Do not use the Submitter Portal to register the metadata objects for array submissions. Please, go to the EGA programmatic submission. Registering Study Go to the EGA programmatic submission Submit an study XML Take a note of your study accession number (EGASXXXXXXXXXXX) To use the study accession number in a publication, we suggest the following format: "Sequence data has been deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA), which is hosted by the EBI and the CRG, under accession number EGASXXXXXXXXXXX. Further information about EGA can be found on https://ega-archive.org "The European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical research"(https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1059 ). Registering Samples Go to the EGA programmatic submission Submit a sample XML Save the list of accession numbers. These will be needed for the AF template. Registering Data Access Committee Further information on the role of your DAC. Go to the EGA programmatic submission Submit a DAC XML Take a note of the DAC accession number (EGACXXXXXXXXXXX) Registering Policy Your Data Access Policy provides the terms and conditions of data use. This is also referred to as the Data Access Agreement (DAA). Completion of a DAA by the applicant/s should form part of the application process to the Data Access Committee (DAA) Go to the EGA programmatic submission Submit a Policy XML Take a note of the Policy accession number (EGAPXXXXXXXXXXX) Complete the Array-based format (AF) spreadsheet Once you have completed the registration of your Study, DAC and Policy using the programmatix submission, you must then complete and return the AF spreadsheet The AF spreadsheet consists on four components: Do not use EGA IDs registered using the Submitter Portal. You can easily identify objects registered in the Submitter Portal by their EGA ID pattern: EGA[A-Z]5{10 more digits} (e.g. for a sample EGAN50000002506). For populating an AF spreadsheet, please exclusively use EGA IDs following this specific pattern: EGA[A-Z]0{10 more digits} (e.g. for a sample EGAN00001691542). Tab1) Webin accessions : Provide the accession numbers for your study, DAC and policy. Please, also add your ega-box number. Tab2) Sample & phenotypes: Please, leave this tab blank. Tab3) Dataset: Describe the dataset to be created Tab4) Data files: Define how your data is going to be organised into datasets and packets for distribution (linkage between samples and files). Should further assistance be required after going through the guide below; please do not hesitate to contact the EGA helpdesk Once the AF spreadsheet is populated, please send it to our EGA helpdesk for further validation. AF spreadsheet Should your submission require multiple DAC's or policies, use ' ; ' to separate the accession numbers. Accessions AF spreadsheet: Samples & phenotypes Samples and phenotypes AF spreadsheet: Datasets We suggest that each dataset consists of a common set of data. The example below consists of two datasets, grouped according to shared data type, technology and by case/control. We also like to capture the number of unique samples that make up the dataset and the Data Access Committee (DAC) responsible for providing the named dataset and their policy (EGAP). Datasets AF spreadsheet: Data files What follows is an example of how to map your samples to the array based files added to your upload account (4th tab). Data Files Please, find below some practical examples on how to register the linkage between samples-files Case 1) 1 sample or list of samples in different datasets: Data Files In case you have a list of samples that belong to different datasets, please, repeat the samples accession number/s in the first column and link the sample to the corresponding dataset each time (each row). Each row is one linkage between sample-file-dataset. Case 2) 1 sample links to several files: Data Files In order to add multiple files to one sample you MUST use “ ; “ between filenames. Example: file1.gpg;file2.gpg;file3.gpg In case that you want to add an extra file to the sample (phenotype or .Rdata), please use “Additional files” column. Important note: You MUST upload the encrypted and unencrypted md5sum values of all files uploaded to your submission account using the filename nomenclature (file.gpg, file.md5,file.md5.gpg). Your submission will not be processed without md5values supplied for all files in the CORRECT format. What happens after the submission of a dataset? All datasets affiliated to unreleased studies are automatically placed on hold until the authorised submitted or DAC contact instructs our EGA helpdesk for the study to be released. Finally, your data is archived within our databases and prepared for encrypted distribution upon the request of permitted EGA account holders. We strongly advise you NOT to delete your data until we confirm that your data has been successfully archived.

  Documentation submission/metadata/submission/array

• Whole Transcriptome Sequencing of Human Tumor Cells and Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells During Aging and Bone Marrow Disorders

  Whole transcriptome sequencing analyses were performed on human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells during aging and bone marrow disorders. For this purpose, normal and diseased bone marrow or peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells were FACS-purified into hematopoietic stem (CD34+CD38-Lin-) or hematopoietic progenitor (CD34+CD38+Lin-) populations. Primary human samples from healthy individuals were used along with comparative analyses in some pre-malignant and malignant conditions, including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and plasma cell dyscrasias (e.g., multiple myeloma). Studies were also performed on total mononuclear cell fractions from patients with newly-diagnosed or relapsed multiple myeloma, or plasma cell leukemia. Briefly, RNA was extracted from all samples and quality was assessed using a Bioanalyzer instrument. Only samples with RNA integrity (RIN) values >7 were subjected to library preparation for RNA-sequencing. The SMARTer v4 cDNA amplification kit was used along with library construction by the NEB Ultra DNA kit for Illumina. Paired-end sequencing was performed on Illumina NextSeq instruments (Scripps Next Generation Sequencing Core), with all samples run over two separate flow-cells (to generate additional sequencing reads); >95M reads were generated in total for each sample. The RNA-sequencing data are available as FASTQ files.

  Study phs002291

• The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-funded Next Generation Genetic Association Studies (NextGen) Consortium: Phenotyping Lipid traits in iPS derived hepatocytes Study (PhLiPS Study)

  The goal of the PhLiPS study is to create a library of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines and iPSC-derived hepatocytes of diverse genotypes for use in metabolic profiling and interrogating lipid phenotypes. These cell lines were created as a part of the Next Generation Genetic Association Studies (Next Gen) Program, which was a five-year, $80 million program to investigate functional genetic variation in humans by assessing cellular profiles that are surrogates for disease phenotypes. To achieve this, researchers from multiple institutions across the U.S. were awarded grants to derive iPSC lines from more than 1,500 individuals representing various conditions as well as healthy controls for use in functional genomic ("disease in a dish") research. This extensive panel includes a diverse set of age, gender, and ethnic backgrounds, and therefore will be an invaluable tool for evaluations across demographics. Further enhancing the utility of these cell lines are data sets such as phenotyping, GWAS, genome sequencing, gene expression and -omics analyses (e.g., lipidomic, proteomic, methylomic) that can be matched to the cell lines. The PhLiPS Study focuses on individuals free of cardiovascular disease or with lipoprotein metabolism disorders in the community served by the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.

  Study phs001341

• CPTAC: Proteogenomic Studies of Ovarian Tumor Responses to Agents Targeting the DNA Damage Response

  There is a critical unmet need for predictors of chemo-refractory High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Despite over 3 decades of research on platinum responses in cancer, no predictive biomarker has been translated into clinical use. Predictors of refractory disease could spare these patients the unnecessary toxicity of a platinum-based regimen and provide a means to triage these patients to clinical trials to identify effective therapies for refractory disease. This study has approached the development of a predictor in a novel way enabling detection of a multi-analyte panel biomarker capable of detecting a subset of refractory HGSOCs with high specificity and implicating potential treatment vulnerabilities for refractory disease. We reported the first proteogenomic analysis of platinum refractoriness in HGSOC and made the novel dataset available as a resource to the community, including a ProTrack portal: http://ptrc.cptac-data-view.org/. Detailed proteogenomic profiles were generated for this study from a retrospective cohort of 242 treatment-naive HGSOCs with enriched representation of "exceptional non-responders" (i.e., patients with chemo-refractory disease). Whole genome sequence (WGS) and RNA seq FASTQ files are available through dbGaP. Proteomic data are available through the NCI Proteomic Data Commons (PDC): https://pdc.cancer.gov/pdc/.

  Study phs003152