10930 results for "division 1 coins fc 26 Buyfc26coins.com is FC 26 coins official site..AwVj"

in 17.66 milliseconds.

• BLUEPRINT release August 2016, RNA-Seq for CD4-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte, on genome GRCh38

  RNA-Seq data for 1 CD4-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2016. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20160816/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002299

• BLUEPRINT release January 2015, RNA-Seq for effector memory CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell

  RNA-Seq data for 1 effector memory CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT release January 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001001153

• BLUEPRINT release August 2015, RNA-Seq for conventional dendritic cell, on genome GRCh38

  RNA-Seq data for 1 conventional dendritic cell sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20150820/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20150820

  Dataset EGAD00001001540

• BLUEPRINT September 2016, ChIP-Seq for conventional dendritic cell from cord blood, on Genome GRCh38

  ChIP-Seq data for 1 sample(s) for conventional dendritic cell from cord blood, on Genome GRCh38. 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT (September 2016).Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_chipseq_analysis_ebi_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001002948

• BLUEPRINT September 2016, ChIP-Seq Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia for precursor B cell from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38

  ChIP-Seq data for 1 sample(s) Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia for precursor B cell from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38. 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT (September 2016).Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_chipseq_analysis_ebi_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001002949

• BLUEPRINT September 2016, ChIP-Seq for memory B cell from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38

  ChIP-Seq data for 1 sample(s) for memory B cell from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38. 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT (September 2016).Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_chipseq_analysis_ebi_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001002950

• BLUEPRINT release August 2014, RNA-Seq for CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell

  RNA-Seq data for 1 CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2014. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001000912

• BLUEPRINT release January 2015, RNA-Seq for effector memory CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell

  RNA-Seq data for 1 effector memory CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT release January 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001001163

• BLUEPRINT release January 2015, RNA-Seq for central memory CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell

  RNA-Seq data for 1 central memory CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT release January 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001001172

• BLUEPRINT release August 2015, RNA-Seq for class switched memory B cell, on genome GRCh38

  RNA-Seq data for 1 class switched memory B cell sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20150820/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20150820

  Dataset EGAD00001001531

• BLUEPRINT release August 2015, RNA-Seq for memory B cell, on genome GRCh38

  RNA-Seq data for 1 memory B cell sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20150820/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20150820

  Dataset EGAD00001001542

• BLUEPRINT release August 2016, RNA-Seq for colony forming unit erythroid, on genome GRCh38

  RNA-Seq data for 1 colony forming unit erythroid sample(s). 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2016. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20160816/homo_sapiens/README_rnaseq_analysis_crg_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002509

• Submission FAQ

  Submission FAQ Before Submission Is the EGA the right archive for my data? TThe most suitable archive for your data is dependent on the type of data you are wishing to submit and whether the data require public or controlled access. Public access is defined as complete and open access to all submitted data. On the contrary, controlled access, exerted by the EGA, requires formal applications to be made to access the submitted data files and metadata. EGA only accepts human-derived data subject to controlled access. If your submission contains other types of data, please choose the appropriate repository for it (see image below): ENA, EVA, ArrayExpress, BioSD and GWAS catalog.  Should your submission be subjected to controlled access? Data access conditions are normally defined in the original informed consent agreements signed by the participants involved in your study. All data submitted to the EGA is subject to controlled access. These consents prevent the derived data files, potentially identifiable, from being dispersed by open and public access. Controlled access data often refers to human data derived from medical research and consortium projects. If in doubt, consult the informed consent agreements that apply to your study The EGA enables you to hold a submission before publication. What data types can be submitted to the EGA? Data types accepted by the EGA can be split into three categories: Sequences: both in generic and platform-specific formats. Array-based: from raw signal files to processed matrices. Phenotypes: all possible phenotype formats are accepted. All manufacturer-specific raw data formats derived from major next generation sequencing platforms are accepted. Also generic sequence formats: flat reads in a FASTQ file, aligned sequences (BAM or CRAM files) as well as sequence variation files in VCF format. All array-based technologies are accepted, including raw data, intensity and analysis files, without any restriction on data formats accepted. We also accept and distribute phenotype data (associated to the samples) in almost any format: from an image to a README file. How long does a submission take? Submissions to EGA come in a variety of formats and sizes, thus it is difficult for us to exactly predict how long a submission will take. We, therefore, advise all of our submitters to allow as much time as possible to make a submission. Based on previous records, we anticipate that the submission process may take at least one month. The submitter’s familiarity with the procedures, possible technical issues that may arise during submission and the amount of data that is being submitted are the main factors that will affect the length of the submission process. However, each step of a regular submission should be considered when estimating the time it would take: Encryption of the files Upload of the files Metadata submission Archival of the files Release of the study and datasets to EGA webpage For example, the upload of the files depends on the submission size, while metadata submission mainly relies on each submitter’s expertise. Further, some steps (e.g. answering to inquiries) depend on the EGA Helpdesk team, which may take some days to be processed during busy times Is data deposited in the EGA secure? The EGA set-up consists of a secure computing facility for data processing, a shared EBI set-up for data submissions and distribution of data via data requests made through the EGA website. Data is also copied in the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) infrastructure, where all stored and distributed data is encrypted Data is encrypted along the submission process and stored securely, granting its access to authorised users exclusively. During the download process, through our Python Client or Aspera, all requested data is downloaded over secure https connections. All data at the EGA is encrypted, and only accessible (for log-in and download) through secure protocols. For further information please, visit our security overview. What documentation do I need to provide? All submissions require policy’s documentation: 'Data Access Agreement (DAA)', 'Data Processing Agreement (DPA)' and 'Authorized Submitters Formulary'. The data processors (EGA) and the data owners will also sign the DPA. Will all metadata be public? Among the submitted metadata we need to make the distinction between identifiable and unidentifiable metadata: (1) the former may allow the identification of the human the sample derived from (e.g. detailed geographical providence, personal name, family ancestry…); (2) while the latter can be used to interpret the data without compromising the anonymity of the patients. The majority of the metadata submitted to the EGA corresponds to the unidentifiable category (e.g. sequencer's model). This type of metadata is publicly available on the EGA website and other EBI resources/partners’ websites. On the other hand, some parts samples’ metadata are subject to being identifiable, and thus only accessible by authorized data requesters, with the exception of: 5 submitter-defined attributes of the sample: alias, title, subject_id, gender and phenotype. It is the submitter’s responsibility not to submit sensitive metadata in these public fields. 3 anonymised fields that pinpoint the sample record in archivals: sample’s EGA stable ID (EGAN…), BioSample ID (SAMEA…) and submitter’s center name. During Submission Are there any sample specific requirements for EGA? All samples submitted to the EGA must include the attributes of biological sex, subject ID (anonymised individual identifier) and phenotype information. These are critical for data findability and its analysis, and we highly recommend using controlled ontology terms where applicable. For example: defining tumour and non-tumour samples and/or defining disease state. The EGA recommends using the Experimental Factor Ontology Database to find ontologized terms that describe your sample phenotypes. How do I get an accession number to use in my publication? You will receive your study accession number (EGAS…) upon complete your submission, either: Programmatically. As soon as the metadata is submitted and validated your study will be assigned an accession number that will be given in the submission’s response. Manually registering your study and relevant metadata using the online metadata submission tool: the EGA submitter Portal. How are files uploaded to the EGA? Data files are uploaded into private submission drop boxes (i.e. environments to which you are granted access and where you can transfer your files) using INBOX or FTP. These spaces are provided as part of the submission procedure. Before uploading any file, you must encrypt your files, . Only encrypted files shall be uploaded to the drop boxes. Why does data need to to encrypted for my submitted files? It is one of the security steps the EGA has implemented. In case of a security breach, people without the proper encryption key will not be able to read or use the information that could have been leaked. This measure is essential when working with sensitive data, such as controlled access human data. All submitters must use crypt4gh to create EGA compliant files prior to uploading them. This encryption is GPG-based, using EGA’s public key. Why are my files not available if I see them in the INBOX? There exists a time window between the data upload and the availability of such files via the Submitter Portal. For this reason, some metadata (run and analysis objects) cannot be registered until at least 24 hours after the files have been uploaded to your box. Why are MD5 sum values generated for my submitted files? We require pre- and post- encryption MD5 (message-digest) checksum values to be provided for all submitted files. These 128-bit values are computed using the content of each file, creating unique sequences that allow us to ensure that file integrity has been maintained during the transfer process. In other words, if the MD5 checksums we generate and those you generated match, we infer that the content of the transferred files is correct (i.e. files are not corrupted or truncated). MD5 checksums are computed automatically using the crypt4gh tool provided. Your submission will not be accepted and may be significantly delayed if you do not provide MD5 checksum values for all data files in the required format. How can I check if my files are correctly uploaded to the inbox? It is important to check the status pf your file so you know whether your files are in the inbox, being processed, or if there is any issue with one of them. In order to check this, you should: Look for the file locally. Drag and drop it to the file table. Then bars will appear on the table, which means that we are processing it. Green: The files checksum are correct and your file will move to “ingested files”. No further actions are needed from your end.. Red: The files checksum does not match and your file needs to be re-uploaded. Please re-upload relevant files to your inbox using the same path. After Submission How do I use my accession number in my publication? We suggest the use of the below template, using your study accession ID (EGAS…) : Data has been deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA), which is hosted by the EBI and the CRG, under accession number EGASXXXXXXXXXXX. Further information about EGA can be found at https://ega-archive.org and "The European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical research" Your study ID will be the one that groups your whole submission, and thus its usage is recommended as such. Nevertheless, all metadata submitted to EGA hold a unique and persistent identifier (starting with EGA…) that can be used to identify specific records. For example, you could reference a specific dataset (EGAD…) or sample (EGAN…) in your publications (see full list of identifiers). How do I make my data searchable? Once you have finalized your submission, you can schedule the data release. Please take into account that the release process needs time for the files to be archived in our system, and for the Helpdesk team to validate your submission. Can I withdraw (meta)data from the EGA? We have methods in place for the secure removal of deposited (meta)data. Contact EGA-helpdesk for further details. EGA complies with FAIRness of (meta)data, and thus, even when the data is removed we keep an entry for their identifiers in our system. In other words, we execute a soft delete on canceled objects (e.g. a study): metadata is still stored in our systems, but it loses all links, cannot be queried and data files cannot be retrieved anymore. The reason behind this behaviour is so that queries using withdrawn data properly respond back (see example of a canceled study). What happens to the data once it has been submitted to the EGA? When the data is submitted, the submitter can choose either keep their data private or schedule the release of their data.

  Documentation submission/metadata/submission/FAQ

• Gene_Discovery_in_Age_Related_Hearing_Loss

  The aim is to find new candidate genes associated with progressive hearing loss

  Study EGAS00001000295

• Placental_mosaicism

  The aim of this study is to survey somatic mutations in human placentas.

  Study EGAS00001003549

• Unraveling metastatic progression of breast cancer

  To reconstruct the trajectories of BC progression, we performed exome sequencing (Illumina HiSeq2000, Truseq DNA sample preparation kit v2 and Exome Enrichment Kit v2; alignement done with BWA, substitutions and indels called with GATK and DINDEL respectively) coupled to validation by Sequenom and deep re-sequencing (ongoing), as well as copy number (CN) analyses (Oncoscan, Affymetrix) on DNA from matched primary (n=1-6/pt), axillary lymph node (ALN, n=1-6 for 4 pts), local recurrence (for 1 pt) and distant metastatic (n=1-5/pt) FFPE samples obtained from an autopsy series of 10 BC pts.

  Study EGAS00001000760

• Single-cell RNA-seq of AML blasts pre and post culture

  This dataset contains 6 Fastq files from 3 samples (pre-culture (n=1), post culture in standard (n=1) or niche-llike (n=1) conditions) from 1 AML patient. They correspond to single-cell RNA sequencing on Illumina plateform of 3 libraries prepared with 10X Genomics gene expression V3.1 chemistry.

  Dataset EGAD00001008772

• BLUEPRINT release January 2015, Bisulfite-Seq for Acute myeloid leukemia

  Bisulfite-Seq data for 1 Acute myeloid leukemia sample(s). 18 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT release January 2015. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_bisulphite_analysis_CNAG_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001001162

• Transcriptome Sequencing of Pediatric Neuroblastoma

  Neuroblastoma is the most common extra-cranial solid tumor in children. It represents 8% to 10% of all childhood cancers. Stage 4 Neuroblastoma is characterized by its clinical heterogeneous outcome. The special category, stage 4S tumors (2-5% of all NB) are chemo-sensitive, and the patients show spontaneous regression. On the other hand, MYCN amplification (25-30% of all NB) is associated with poor outcome of neuroblastoma, thus we further categorize stage 4 neuroblastoma into MYCN non-amplified and MYCN amplified group. Here we use transcriptome sequencing to characterize the transcriptome in 29 stage 4 Neuroblastoma samples.

  Study phs000868

• Whole Genome Sequencing of Skull-Based Chordoma

  Chordoma is a rare bone tumor, which is believed to originate from notochordal remnants. Based on the United States Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data, the incidence of chordoma varies by gender and race; however, little is known about the etiologic factors that predispose to it. Genomic profiling studies of chordoma are limited, particularly in the Chinese population. We therefore conducted a detailed molecular characterization of paired chordoma tumor/normal tissues using fresh frozen tissues and blood collected from skull-based Chinese chordoma patients. These analyses included whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing analyses.

  Study phs002301

• Studies in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Capillary Leak Syndrome (SCLS, Clarkson Disease)

  Systemic capillary leak syndrome (Clarkson disease) is an ultra-rare disease of unknown etiology. Patients experienced transient and recurrent episodes of hypotensive shock and massive peripheral edema due to plasma extravasation, often precipitated by minor viral infections. Disease onset occurs most frequently in middle age, and there is no family history. More than 90% of patients with the disease have monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS). The goal of the study is to determine pathogenic mechanisms and identify genetic underpinnings of the disease. Toward this end, we performed whole genome sequencing (WGS).

  Study phs003261

• Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) Recognize Unique Somatic Mutations and Mediate Objective Clinical Responses in Metastatic Breast Cancer

  The purpose of this study is to investigate the immunogenicity of tumor mutations in patients with metastatic cancer. Harvest and analysis of progressing metastatic lesions are used for generation of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cultures and the detections of somatic mutations. In vitro T cell activation assays are used to examine the immune recognition of tumor mutations by autologous TIL. Once a candidate is determined to have a cell product that meets the requirements of one of the Surgery Branch clinical trials, the candidate is evaluated for enrollment in a prospective adoptive cell therapy trial.

  Study phs002735

• Immune signature of malignant melanoma in pregnancy

  Melanoma is a highly immunogenic malignancy and there is a deep-rooted notion among clinicians that a probable systemic immunosuppressed state during pregnancy would negatively influence melanoma related prognosis. To test this hypothesis on a more fundamental level, we collected a unique set of melanoma tumor samples and performed RNAseq to draw comparisons between the immune cell infiltrate of pregnant patients and non-pregnant matched controls. We found that there is indeed no differential expression of any immune cell subset. This underscores the notion that the supposed immunosuppressive state of pregnancy does not hamper the anti-tumor immune response.

  Study EGAS50000000492

• Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Program in Bladder Exstrophy, Epispadias, Complex (BEEC)

  Urogenital anomalies account for 20-30% of prenatally detected structural defects. Bladder Exstrophy Epispadias Complex (BEEC) describes a subset of anomalies with a spectrum of developmental defects ranging from a mild form of epispadias, to classic bladder exstrophy, to omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, spinal anomalies (OEIS) complex. Patients with BEEC suffer substantial morbidity and mortality due to impaired genito-urinary dysfunction. The etiology of BEEC is largely unknown. Elucidating the underlying genetic component is critical to gaining a better understanding of the developmental signaling pathways and is likely the first step to developing targeted therapy.

  Study phs002173

• CAGE analysis for endometrial carcinoma

  For endometrial cancer patients, lymphadenectomy is recommended to exclude rarely metastasized cancer cells. This procedure is performed even in patients with low risk of recurrence despite the risk of complications such as lymphedema. A method to accurately identify cases with no lymph node metastases (LN-) before lymphadenectomy is therefore highly required. We approached this clinical problem by examining primary lesions of endometrial cancers with CAGE (Cap Analysis Gene Expression), which quantifies promoter-level expression across the genome. Fourteen profiles delineated distinct transcriptional networks between LN?+?and LN- cases, within those classified as having the low or intermediate risk of recurrence.

  Study JGAS000124