12244 results for "fc 26 coins pc Visit Buyfc26coins.com for latest FC 26 coins news..z7ux"

in 12.49 milliseconds.

• WXS files for Roussel-ATRT-TM

  WXS files for Roussel-ATRT-TM paper titled "Atypical teratoid/ rhabdoid tumoroids reveal subgroup-specific drug vulnerabilities"

  Dataset EGAD00001009164

• Dataset for "Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Clonal Evolution Induced by HPV Integration" (Illumina)

  Dataset for "Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Clonal Evolution Induced by HPV Integration" (Illumina)

  Dataset EGAD00001009630

• Thymic epithelial transplantation for complete DiGeorge syndrome Spatial (2025-07-28)

  Spatial transcriptomics study of thymic transplant biopsies . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2025-07-28.

  Dataset EGAD00001015659

• UKBEC 1st release of Exome data for 65 individuals

  UKBEC 1st release of Exome data for 65 neuropathologically confirmed control individuals of European descent.

  Dataset EGAD00001003100

• DATA FILES FOR GRUBER SJAMLM7 RNASEQ

  DATA FILES FOR GRUBER SJAMLM7 RNASEQ

  Dataset EGAD00001003135

• McGill EMC Release 4 in tissue "venous blood" for cell type "eosinophil"

  McGill EMC Release 4 in tissue "venous blood" for cell type "eosinophil"

  Dataset EGAD00001001281

• McGill EMC Release 4 in tissue "venous blood" for cell type "Monocyte"

  McGill EMC Release 4 in tissue "venous blood" for cell type "Monocyte"

  Dataset EGAD00001001282

• Maternal Plasma RNA Sequencing for Genomewide Transcriptomic Profiling and Identification of Pregnancy-Associated Transcripts

  Maternal Plasma RNA Sequencing for Genomewide Transcriptomic Profiling and Identification of Pregnancy-Associated Transcripts

  Dataset EGAD00001001609

• NHLBI TOPMed - NHGRI CCDG: The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Atrial Fibrillation Genetics Study

  Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is the primary cause of many hospital admissions, and is associated with significant secondary morbidity by increasing the risk of stroke, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. The incidence of AF is on the rise, and it is projected that by the year 2050 more than 10 million patients will be affected by AF in the United States alone. Anti-arrhythmic medications have limited success in maintaining sinus rhythm, are associated with side effects, and appear ineffective at reducing mortality compared to a strategy of rate control and anticoagulation. Given the significant morbidity associated with this common arrhythmia, surgical and catheter ablation techniques have been developed to treat AF. However, despite the incorporation of various strategies for ablation, long-term recurrence rates of AF remain higher than 25 percent after ablation. Current techniques for catheter ablation of AF include pulmonary vein isolation and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation. However, the contribution of each strategy to long-term procedural success and the relative importance of each strategy for different patients remain unknown. Recent advances in cardiac imaging have allowed detailed analysis of left atrial myocardial anatomy. Parallel advances in molecular genetics have identified several candidate genes involved in familial and non-familial AF. However, the pathophysiology of AF generation and maintenance, and the potential contribution of such genetic or anatomic substrates for patient selection, and for target identification during catheter ablation have not yet been examined. Advances in molecular genetics and imaging, coupled with techniques for endocardial and epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory present an opportunity to significantly improve our understanding of (1) The relation of paroxysmal versus persistent AF with (a) structural left atrial changes (left/right atrial scar, wall thinning, pulmonary vein anomalies, and coronary sinus dilation) and with (b) candidate genetic variants. (2) The relation of candidate genetic variants with (a) structural left atrial changes and with (b) electrophysiologic properties (atrial effective refractory period (AERP) inhomogeneity, voltage abnormalities, trigger burden and location, C FAE extent and location), (3) The relation of structural left atrial changes with (a) CFAE location as targets for catheter ablation and with (b) reversible conduction block/myocardial injury after pulmonary vein isolation, and (4) Individualized endocardial targets for AF ablation based on candidate genes and anatomic substrates. The proposed study will improve our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of AF, and may improve current techniques for treatment of this important arrhythmia.

  Study phs001598

• Assessment of RNA-Seq Sample Preparation Methodology

  The goal of this study was two-fold, to determine if common purification techniques have any effect on downstream differential expression analysis and to evaluate combinations of alignment and differential expression software for reliability. To this end, blood was collected from three individuals and pooled during and after extraction. After pooling and mixing was completed, samples were divided into three aliquots for testing. The first aliquot was a control and not purified or concentrated. It was diluted to produce samples of varying concentrations for testing. The second aliquot was diluted to 20 ng/μL and used to test six different variations on the AMPure XP bead purification procedure. The last aliquot was also diluted to varying concentrations of 60, 30, and 9.6 ng/μL and purified using MinElute columns. Samples were submitted for total RNA-Seq library preparation and sequencing. Library preparation was performed using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA with Ribo-Zero Globin kit (20020612, Illumina Inc.), and 2x150 bp PE sequencing was done on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 with the S4 reagent kit. Comparisons were made between methods (AMPure vs. unpurified, AMPure vs. MinElute, MinElute vs. unpurified) to assess the effects of purification method on downstream differential expression. Comparisons were also made within methods using the varying concentrations tested for unpurified samples and for MinElute purified samples to assess the effects of concentration on differential expression. Variations of the AMPure procedure were also compared to assess the effectiveness of the variations tested in comparison to the unmodified procedure. A subset of samples was selected for use with alignment and differential expression package comparison. Unpurified high concentration samples eluted in RNAse-free water were compared to unpurified high concentration samples eluted in BR5, a buffer from the PAXgene blood miRNA kit, with the expectation that there should be no or very few differentially expressed genes. Unpurified high concentration samples eluted in RNAse-free water were also compared to unpurified low concentration samples also eluted in RNAse-free water, with possibly a small number of differentially expressed genes anticipated. A third dataset of simulated RNA-seq data was created with a known rate of differential expression. These files were aligned using Bowtie2, HISAT2, kallisto, RSEM, Rsubread, Salmon, and STAR. Results were then analyzed for differential expression using ALDEx2, baySeq, DEGseq, DESeq2, edgeR, limma, NOISeq, PoissonSeq, and SAMseq. Differential expression results of all three comparisons were evaluated to determine which combinations provided the most reliable results for both real and simulated data.

  Study phs003001