619 results for "fc points pc 26 Besuche die Website Buyfc26coins.com. Günstig, schnell..SJBD"

in 6.41 milliseconds.

• Small‑scale mutations are infrequent as mechanisms of resistance in post‑PARP inhibitor tumour samples in high grade serous ovarian cancer

  Targeted DNA sequencing of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) tumour and normal samples from 26 patients. Following target hybrid capture of 63 genes involved in DNA repair and response to treatment with an Agilent SureSelect XT panel, sequencing libraries were generated using the SureSelect XT Low Input Target Enrichment System (Agilent) as per the manufacturer's protocol. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (Melbourne, Australia).

  Study EGAS50000000146

• scRNAseq dataset of circulating T cells in FL patient before and after Lenalidomide treatment

  scRNAseq dataset of circulating T cells from 3 FL patients (P011, P014 and P020) included in the GALEN clinical trial. There is two time points for each patient : One before treatment (D0) and one at day 7 of Lenalidomide treatment (D7).

  Dataset EGAD50000001529

• Cord blood progenitor CITE-seq dataset

  Sequencing results of single-cell transcriptome and antibody libraries from two biological experiments of cord blood progenitor cells. Four samples from different time points were processed using 10X Genomics Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kits v3.1. Gene expression and antibody-derived libraries were sequenced separately.

  Dataset EGAD50000000405

• Delineate genomic and epigenomic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy

  We performed whole-exome sequencing and whole epigenome sequencing (RRBS) of samples collected from different time points during radiotherapy from thirty-four ESCC patients. We compared the genetic and epigenetic features of the different time biopsy samples to reveal the changes in ESCC received radiotherapy.

  Dataset EGAD00001003799

• A Perioperative Study of Safusidenib in Patients with IDH1-Mutated Glioma

  10 participants with a radiological or pathological diagnosis of WHO Grade 2 lower-grade glioma (LGG) were recruited at a single center starting in December, 2022. Eligibility criteria permitted participants who had undergone prior surgery for WHO Grade 2 LGG, but excluded those with a history of prior radiation or chemotherapy.In Part A of the study, participants underwent an initial craniotomy with tumor biopsy and a lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection at study entry. Following sample collection, participants received safusidenib at the recommended phase 2 doses of 250 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for a period of 22–36 days. This was followed by a second craniotomy for maximal safe tumor resection and a repeat lumbar puncture within 5 hours of the final pre-resection dose of safusidenib. Tumor, blood, and CSF samples were collected at both surgical time points for comprehensive translational research.Molecular analyses were performed on samples collected at both time points. These included pharmacokinetics (PK), targeted metabolomics, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of tumor tissue, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), and DNA methylation profiling on all patients. Targeted metabolomics was conducted on samples from 9 participants, while spatial transcriptomics and spatial metabolomics were performed on tumor tissue from 3 participants each. Histone methylation profiling was conducted on samples from 8 participants.

  Study phs003976

• Heart Failure Network: Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (HFN DOSE-BioLINCC)

  ObjectivesThe DOSE study sought to evaluate the most effective dosing (high vs. low) and administration (continuous infusion vs. intermittent boluses) combination of the diuretic Furosemide in the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure.BackgroundAcute decompensated heart failure is the most common cause of hospital admissions among patients older than 65 years of age and is responsible for more than 1 million hospitalizations annually in the United States. Intravenous loop diuretics are an essential component of current treatment and are administered to approximately 90% of patients who are hospitalized with heart failure. Despite decades of clinical experience with these agents, prospective data to guide the use of loop diuretics are sparse, and current guidelines are based primarily on expert opinion. As a result, clinical practice varies widely with regard to both the mode of administration and the dosing.SubjectsA total of 308 patients were enrolled between March 2008 and November 2009 at 26 clinical sites in the United States and Canada. DesignThe DOSE study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design. Patients were randomly assigned to either a low-dose strategy (total intravenous furosemide dose equal to their total daily oral loop diuretic dose in furosemide equivalents) or a high-dose strategy (total daily intravenous furosemide dose 2.5 times their total daily oral loop diuretic dose in furosemide equivalents) and to administration of furosemide either by intravenous bolus every 12 hours or by continuous intravenous infusion.The study treatment, with group assignments concealed, was continued for up to 72 hours. At 48 hours, the treating physician had the option of adjusting the diuretic strategy on the basis of the clinical response. An assessment of biomarkers, including creatinine, cystatin C, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, was performed at a central core laboratory at baseline, 72 hours, and 60 days. Patients were followed for clinical events to day 60. The coprimary end points were patients' global assessment of symptoms, quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the score on a visual-analogue scale over the course of 72 hours, and the change in the serum creatinine level from baseline to 72 hours.ConclusionsAmong patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there were no significant differences in patients' global assessment of symptoms or in the change in renal function when diuretic therapy was administered by bolus as compared with continuous infusion or at a high dose as compared with a low dose. (Felker et. al., 2011, PMID: 21366472)

  Study phs003524

• Microbiome

  16S-sequencing: All stool samples were processed according to the standards of the Flemish Gut Flora Project (Falony et al., 2016). All samples were processed together and sequenced in as a single batch (dual index run DI23R22) which included positive controls (PC, identical stool sample), negative controls (PCR-mix) and ‘blanks’ or negative controls of the extraction (no sample). In addition, a Runella strain (RS) was included to check for potential cross-contamination, as this strain is not present in human samples. The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primer pair 515F and 806R (GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA and GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT, resp.), modified to contain a barcode sequence between each primer and the Illumina adaptor sequences to produce dual- barcoded libraries (Tito et al., 2019). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq. Sequences were processed using the LotuS (Hildebrand et al., 2014) and DADA2 pipeline (Callahan et al., 2016) using RDP 16 as the reference taxonomy.

  Dataset EGAD50000002027

• What is the cBio Portal

  EGA cBioPortal What is the EGA cBioPortal? EGA hosts a dedicated cBioPortal instance that enables authorized researchers to explore and visualize selected cancer datasets archived at EGA. Data submitters can also contribute cancer datasets to be made available through the portal. The platform provides interactive tools to analyse genomic and clinical data once access has been granted by the relevant Data Access Committee (DAC). How to find and access an EGA cBioPortal Dataset 1. Register as an EGA user 2. Go to the dataset page of interest. You can use the Search function to find datasets available in cBioPortal. If the dataset is available on the EGA cBioPortal Instance, the cBioPortal icon will be displayed on the dataset page, as shown below: On the dataset page, you will find information about access requirements. For more details, please visit how to request access. 3. Once access has been granted Go to the EGA cBioPortal instance and log in with your EGA user accountThe approved dataset will be listed in cBioPortalSelect the dataset to start exploring the data What you can do in cBioPortal The EGA cBioPortal is designed for interactive exploration and visualization of controlled-access cancer datasets, including: Visualising genomic alterationsAnalysing mutation patternsFiltering by clinical attributesComparing molecular profilesGenerating plots and summaries Important Notes Datasets are only visible in cBioPortal after DAC approvalAccess requests must always be submitted through the EGA website If you encounter any issues gaining access to a dataset, please contact EGA Support.If your question is related to the cBioPortal features, please reach out to: cbioportal@googlegroups.com. The EGA Helpdesk does not support this platform. How to link a dataset to the EGA cBioPortal instance during a submission STEP 1 – cBioPortal File Upload to EGA Files must be uploaded to the SFTP INBOX. The supported cBioPortal file types are: Raw data (e.g., VCF files)cBioPortal-specific formats (e.g., MAF files) STEP 2 – Register the cBioPortal dataset in the Submitter Portal Register the cBioPortal files in an analysis objectRegister a dataset with the title “cBioPortal Metadata” and include the analysis and nothing else Please note that cBioPortal is not directly supported by the EGA Helpdesk. For questions about the platform, please visit the cBioPortal website or contact the cBioPortal support team at cbioportal@googlegroups.com. The EGA does not support this platform.

  Documentation submission/metadata/submission/cbioportal

• Chromatin accessibility in human monocyte differentiation

  This dataset consists of ATAC-seq data from human monocytes, monocyte-derived dendritic cells or monocyte-derived macrophages as well as monocyte-derived cells that were subjected to siRNA treatment targeting TET2, IRF4 and EGR2. In total, it includes 26 samples.

  Dataset EGAD00001006601

• Detection of cancers three years prior to diagnosis using plasma cell-free DNA

  A major goal of early cancer detection is to identify subclinical disease when the tumor burden is low, so that treatments are more effective. But how early can cancers be detected prior to clinical signs or symptoms? This question can be answered only through the evaluation of participants whose clinical course has not been altered by the study itself. We here describe such an evaluation, performed on prospectively collected plasma samples from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, including 26 participants diagnosed with cancer and 26 matched controls. At the index time point, eight of these 52 participants scored positively with a multicancer early detection (MCED) blood test. All eight of these participants were diagnosed with cancer within 4 months after blood collection. In six of these 8 participants, we were able to assess an earlier plasma sample collected 3.1 to 3.5 years prior to clinical diagnosis. In four of these six participants, the same mutations detected by the MCED test could be identified, but at 8.6 to 79-fold lower levels. These results demonstrate that it is possible to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) more than three years prior to clinical diagnosis, and provide benchmark sensitivities required for the success of ctDNA-based tests for this purpose.

  Study EGAS00001008068