11925 results for "cancer rna-seq"

in 17.33 milliseconds.

• Reference epigenome SMC09 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC09 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007352

• Reference epigenome ADMSC01 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC01 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007357

• Reference epigenome ADMSC01 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC01 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007358

• Reference epigenome ADMSC01 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC01 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007359

• Reference epigenome ADMSC01 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC01 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007360

• Reference epigenome ADMSC05 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC05 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007376

• Reference epigenome ADMSC07 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC07 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007390

• Reference epigenome ADMSC07 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC07 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007392

• Reference epigenome ADMSC07 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC07 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007393

• Reference epigenome ADMSC08 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC08 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007401

• Reference epigenome SMC04 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC04 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007331

• Reference epigenome SMC09 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC09 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007353

• Reference epigenome SMC01 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC01 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007309

• Reference epigenome SMC02 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC02 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007314

• Reference epigenome SMC02 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC02 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007319

• Reference epigenome SMC09 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC09 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007351

• Reference epigenome SMC05 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC05 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007335

• Reference epigenome ADMSC02 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC02 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007366

• Reference epigenome ADMSC05 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC05 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007377

• Reference epigenome ADMSC06 h3k27Ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC06 h3k27Ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007381

• Reference epigenome ADMSC06 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC06 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007384

• Reference epigenome ADMSC07 h3k27Ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC07 h3k27Ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007388

• Reference epigenome ADMSC07 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC07 h3k27me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007389

• Reference epigenome ADMSC06 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC06 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007383

• Reference epigenome SMC02_smRNA-Seq data generated from KEP study

  A SMC02_smRNA-Seq single end data for skeletal muscle cells

  Dataset EGAD00001003859

• Reference epigenome KNIH008 mRNA-seq data generated from KEP study

  A KNIH008 mRNA-seq paired end data for adipocytes

  Dataset EGAD00001002174

• Reference epigenome KNIH007 miRNA-seq data generated from KEP study

  A KNIH007 miRNA-seq single end data for adipocytes

  Dataset EGAD00001002766

• Reference epigenome KNIH008 miRNA-seq data generated from KEP study

  A KNIH008 miRNA-seq single end data for adipocytes

  Dataset EGAD00001002767

• Reference epigenome Islet-derived-MSC04 miRNA-Seq data generated from KEP study

  Islet-derived-MSC04 miRNA-Seq single end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007184

• Reference epigenome SMC03 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC03 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007325

• Reference epigenome SMC08 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  SMC08 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007346

• Reference epigenome ADMSC02 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC02 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007367

• Reference epigenome ADMSC03 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC03 h3k27ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007368

• Reference epigenome ADMSC03 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC03 h3k36me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007369

• Reference epigenome ADMSC03 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC03 h3k4me1 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007370

• Reference epigenome ADMSC03 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC03 h3k4me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007371

• Reference epigenome ADMSC03 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC03 h3k9me3 ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007372

• Reference epigenome ADMSC03 input ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC03 input ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007373

• Reference epigenome ADMSC05 h3k27Ac ChIP-Seq data generated from KEP study

  ADMSC05 h3k27Ac ChIP-Seq paired end data

  Dataset EGAD00001007374

• Exome and RNA sequencing of Greenlanders

  This study contains whole exome sequence of 27 Greenlanders and deep RNA sequencing of 17 Greenlanders

  Study EGAS00001002727

• Characterizing the tumor immune microenvironment of ependymomas using targeted gene expression profiles and RNA-sequencing the pros and cons

  RNA sequencing data of a collection of 6 pediatric ependymoma cases

  Study EGAS00001006535

• Total RNA sequencing of RNA from testicular tissue

  Study EGAS00001006119

• Genetic and Hormonal Contributions to Gene Expression in Immune Cells

  The origins of sex differences in human disease are elusive, in part because of difficulties in separating the effects of sex hormones and sex chromosomes. To isolate the effects of testosterone, estradiol, and sex chromosome complement (XX or XY) in humans, we implemented a four-state, cross-sectional study design of trans- and cisgender individuals, the former receiving exogenous testosterone or estradiol for at least a year as part of their gender-affirming medical care. This study design allowed us to compare four combinations of sex hormones and sex chromosomes in humans: XX individuals treated with exogenous testosterone (n=21), XY individuals treated with exogenous estradiol (n=13), untreated XX individuals (n=20), and untreated XY individuals (n=15). We chose to focus on the human immune system because it displays an impressively broad range of sex-differential biology. We collected blood samples from each individual and isolated PBMCs the same day. We performed 10X Genomics 3' single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) on PBMCs from the 69 individuals. We generated 150-bp paired end reads from a total of 358,426 cells (with an average of 48,007 reads/cell) and identified 18 distinct immune cell types. We found that testosterone, estradiol, and sex chromosome complement have unique, non-overlapping effects on PBMC cell abundances and gene expression.

  Study phs003860

• A Perioperative Study of Safusidenib in Patients with IDH1-Mutated Glioma

  10 participants with a radiological or pathological diagnosis of WHO Grade 2 lower-grade glioma (LGG) were recruited at a single center starting in December, 2022. Eligibility criteria permitted participants who had undergone prior surgery for WHO Grade 2 LGG, but excluded those with a history of prior radiation or chemotherapy.In Part A of the study, participants underwent an initial craniotomy with tumor biopsy and a lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection at study entry. Following sample collection, participants received safusidenib at the recommended phase 2 doses of 250 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for a period of 22–36 days. This was followed by a second craniotomy for maximal safe tumor resection and a repeat lumbar puncture within 5 hours of the final pre-resection dose of safusidenib. Tumor, blood, and CSF samples were collected at both surgical time points for comprehensive translational research.Molecular analyses were performed on samples collected at both time points. These included pharmacokinetics (PK), targeted metabolomics, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of tumor tissue, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq), and DNA methylation profiling on all patients. Targeted metabolomics was conducted on samples from 9 participants, while spatial transcriptomics and spatial metabolomics were performed on tumor tissue from 3 participants each. Histone methylation profiling was conducted on samples from 8 participants.

  Study phs003976

• Symptom Clusters in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

  The parent longitudinal study evaluated the symptom experience of oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Patients completed questionnaires in their homes a total of six times (assessments 1 through 6). The questionnaires were timed to evaluate symptoms associated with the receipt of two cycles of chemotherapy that were administered approximately a month apart. Assessments 1 and 4 evaluated symptoms prior to the receipt of chemotherapy. Assessments 2 and 5 evaluated symptoms in the week following the administration of chemotherapy. Assessments 3 and 6 evaluated symptoms two weeks following the administration of chemotherapy. For this analysis, morning and evening fatigue data from the enrollment assessment (i.e., prior to the second or third cycle of chemotherapy) and the assessment that was done approximately 1 week after administration of chemotherapy were evaluated. Patients completed the Lee Fatigue Scale to obtain information on morning and evening fatigue severity. For the morning fatigue assessment, patients were asked to describe how they “felt over the past week when they woke up in the morning”. For the evening fatigue assessment, they were asked to describe how they felt over the past week “before they went to bed at night”. Medical records were reviewed for disease and treatment information. Epigenome assays (microarray) were completed for 1170 patients. Whole transcriptome sequencing (bulk RNA-Seq) was completed for 651 patients.

  Study phs003863

• Identification_of_cardiovascular_biomarkers_through_an_integrative_omics_approach

  Recent GWAS studies have made extensive use of large eQTL data sets to functionallyannotate index SNPs. With a large number of association signals located outside codingregions there has been an intense search among sequence variants affecting geneexpression at the transcriptional level. However, little progress has been made in mappingregulatory variants that affect protein levels at the translational or post-translational level. It isnow possible to undertake a protein QTL scan for focused sets of e.g. oxidized proteins bymass spectrometry. We have established a collaboration with a longitudinal, family-basedstudy in France, the Stanislas cohort, which comprises circa 1000 nuclear families (4,295individuals) and has follow up data for 10 years (three visits). We have undertaken a pilotstudy in a focus set of 257 subjects from 79 families with the aim to integrate GWAS,transcriptomic and DNA methylation data with proteomic data on a set of 100 proteinsmeasured in PBMCs. We have already generated GWAS data using Illumina's core-exomechip as well as DNA methylation profiles with the 450K array. We propose to use RNA seq togenerate transcriptomic data of the corresponding PBMCs.This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/

  Study EGAS00001000711

• An Empirical Approach Leveraging Tumorgrafts to Dissect the Tumor Microenvironment in Renal Cell Carcinoma Identifies Missing Link to Prognostic Inflammatory Factors

  We undertook an empirical approach to dissect the tumor microenvironment by developing a bulk tumor dissection algorithm, DisHet, and leveraging RNA-Seq data of tumorgrafts (patient-derived tumors implanted in mice), in which only the tumor cell component expands. We found that approximately 65% of previously defined immune signature genes are not abundantly expressed in the Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) microenvironment, and we identified more than two times as many novel immune/stromal transcripts. By using refined immune/stroma-specific genes and genomics, electronic medical record data and imaging data of 1084 RCC patients, we discovered a highly-inflamed pan-RCC subtype enriched for Treg cells, NK cells, Th1 cells, neutrophils, macrophages, B cells, and CD8+ T cells. This inflamed subtype (IS) is enriched for aggressive RCCs, including BAP1-deficient clear-cell and type 2 papillary tumors. Interestingly, IS is correlated with systemic manifestations of inflammation in patients such as thrombocytosis and anemia, whose pathogenesis were poorly defined and have been predictors of poor prognosis in RCC. Indeed, we discovered that IS is a strong predictor of poor survival. Lastly, our analyses show that tumor cells may drive stromal immune response. Overall, these data provide a missing link between the tumor cells, the tumor microenvironment, and systemic factors.

  Study EGAS00001002786

• Human Pancreatic Islet RNAseq - Lund

  Most signals detected by genome-wide association studies map to non-coding sequence and their tissue-specific effects influence transcriptional regulation. However, many key tissues and cell-types required for appropriate functional inference are absent from large-scale resources such as ENCODE and GTEx. We explored the relationship between genetic variants influencing predisposition to type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related glycemic traits, and human pancreatic islet transcription using RNA-Seq and genotyping data from 420 islet donors. We find: (a) eQTLs have a variable replication rate across the 44 GTEx tissues (<73%), indicating that our study captured islet-specific cis-eQTL signals; (b) islet eQTL signals show marked overlap with islet epigenome annotation, though eQTL effect size is reduced in the stretch enhancers most strongly implicated in GWAS signal location; (c) selective enrichment of islet eQTL overlap with the subset of T2D variants implicated in islet dysfunction; and (d) colocalization between islet eQTLs and variants influencing T2D or related glycemic traits, delivering candidate effector transcripts at 23 loci, including DGKB and TCF7L2. Our findings illustrate the advantages of performing functional and regulatory studies in tissues of greatest disease-relevance while expanding our mechanistic insights into complex traits association loci activity with an expanded list of putative transcripts implicated in T2D development.

  Study EGAS00001004042

• GWAS data on human pancreatic islets from 191 donors - Lund

  Most signals detected by genome-wide association studies map to non-coding sequence and their tissue-specific effects influence transcriptional regulation. However, many key tissues and cell-types required for appropriate functional inference are absent from large-scale resources such as ENCODE and GTEx. We explored the relationship between genetic variants influencing predisposition to type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related glycemic traits, and human pancreatic islet transcription using RNA-Seq and genotyping data from 420 islet donors. We find: (a) eQTLs have a variable replication rate across the 44 GTEx tissues (<73%), indicating that our study captured islet-specific cis-eQTL signals; (b) islet eQTL signals show marked overlap with islet epigenome annotation, though eQTL effect size is reduced in the stretch enhancers most strongly implicated in GWAS signal location; (c) selective enrichment of islet eQTL overlap with the subset of T2D variants implicated in islet dysfunction; and (d) colocalization between islet eQTLs and variants influencing T2D or related glycemic traits, delivering candidate effector transcripts at 23 loci, including DGKB and TCF7L2. Our findings illustrate the advantages of performing functional and regulatory studies in tissues of greatest disease-relevance while expanding our mechanistic insights into complex traits association loci activity with an expanded list of putative transcripts implicated in T2D development.

  Study EGAS00001004044

• Phenotyping data on human pancreatic islets from 191 donors - Lund

  Most signals detected by genome-wide association studies map to non-coding sequence and their tissue-specific effects influence transcriptional regulation. However, many key tissues and cell-types required for appropriate functional inference are absent from large-scale resources such as ENCODE and GTEx. We explored the relationship between genetic variants influencing predisposition to type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related glycemic traits, and human pancreatic islet transcription using RNA-Seq and genotyping data from 420 islet donors. We find: (a) eQTLs have a variable replication rate across the 44 GTEx tissues (<73%), indicating that our study captured islet-specific cis-eQTL signals; (b) islet eQTL signals show marked overlap with islet epigenome annotation, though eQTL effect size is reduced in the stretch enhancers most strongly implicated in GWAS signal location; (c) selective enrichment of islet eQTL overlap with the subset of T2D variants implicated in islet dysfunction; and (d) colocalization between islet eQTLs and variants influencing T2D or related glycemic traits, delivering candidate effector transcripts at 23 loci, including DGKB and TCF7L2. Our findings illustrate the advantages of performing functional and regulatory studies in tissues of greatest disease-relevance while expanding our mechanistic insights into complex traits association loci activity with an expanded list of putative transcripts implicated in T2D development.

  Study EGAS00001004056