495 results for "cancer rna-seq"

in 6.08 milliseconds.

• RNA-Seq data from 34 CAF-S3 subset in human breast and ovarian cancers

  This dataset is related to publications Costa et al. Cancer Cell 2018 and Givel et al. Nat. Commun. 2018 which describe the identification of 4 Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAF) in breast and ovarian cancer. This dataset contains transcriptomic profiles obtained by RNA-Seq of 34 CAF-S3 samples from breast and ovarian Tumors.

  Dataset EGAD00001004810

• RNAseq data to study PRPF6 regulated splice forms in colon cancer cell lines

  Alternative splicing plays critical roles in differentiation, development, and cancer (Pettigrew et al., 2008; Chen and Manley, 2009). The recent identification of specific spliceosome inhibitors has generated interest in the therapeutic potential of targeting this cellular process (van Alphen et al., 2009). Using an integrated genomic approach, we have identified PRPF6, an RNA binding component of the pre-mRNA spliceosome, as an essential driver of oncogenesis in colon cancer. Importantly, PRPF6 is both amplified and overexpressed in colon cancer, and only colon cancer cells with high PRPF6 levels are sensitive to its loss. Our data clearly point to an important role for PRPF6 in colon cancer growth and suggest that a better understanding of its role in alternative splicing in colon cancer is warranted. To determine the specific alternative splice forms that PRPF6 regulates in colon cancer, we plan three experiments: 1. The first involves knocking down expression of PRPF6 in two different cancer cell lines with 3 different siRNAs, and then completing RNA-seq to determine the gene expression changes that occur relative to a non-targeting control siRNA. Because of the role for PRPF6 in pre-mRNA splicing, we especially want to quantify the changes in splice-specific forms of all genes genome-wide to identify genes whose splicing is altered upon PRPF6 knockdown. 2. The second involves immunoprecipitating PRPF6 from two different cancer cell lines and isolating any RNA that is bound to PRPF6, since PRPF6 is an RNA-binding protein. We then want to carry out RNA-seq to identify which RNA molecules co-immunoprecipitated with PRPF6. This will help us determine possible functions for PRPF6 in regulating colon cancer growth. 3. The third involves overexpressing PRPF6 in cell lines and then carrying out RNA-seq to identify any changes in splice-specific gene expression. This will allow us to determine whether increased PRPF6 expression is sufficient to drive alternative splicing changes.

  Study EGAS00001000761

• Expanding the utility of transcriptome analysis for mutation detection in high-risk childhood precision oncology

  In precision oncology, rapid and comprehensive mutation detection is essential for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) offers unique advantages by capturing functional consequences of genomic alterations and has the potential to detect not only oncogenic fusions, but also a broad spectrum of clinically relevant mutations traditionally identified from DNA-based approaches. We evaluated the utility of RNA-seq in a cohort of 477 high-risk paediatric tumours enrolled in the ZERO childhood cancer precision medicine programme with matched WGS data. A combination of reference-guided and reference-free RNA-seq algorithms were used to detect and interpret fusions and intragenic structural variants (SVs), resolving events from complex rearrangements and paralogous loci. RNA-seq detected 95% of gene fusions, including 33 missed by WGS. All intragenic SVs (100%) detected by WGS were also identified by RNA-seq and RNA-seq was essential for identification and/or interpretation of 30% of SVs. Additional functional insight such as aberrant splice-junctions and transcript abundance were critical for resolving pathogenicity. For single nucleotide variants and small insertions/deletions (SNVs/Indels), RNA-seq confirmed 92% and was essential for refining pathogenicity in 22% through allele-specific expression and splice assessment. These findings highlight RNA-seq as a critical complement to WGS, that transforms interpretation by adding functional context, thereby elevating diagnostic confidence and clinical decision-making.

  Study EGAS00001008472

• Transcriptome profiling of prostate tissue samples from early onset prostate cancer patients and normal controls by RNA-seq

  The dataset contains RNA-seq data of 96 EOPC patients and 9 controls. For some patients multiple tissue samples were sequenced ("multi-area" samples). The RNA extraction and sequencing protocol was earlier described in Weischenfeldt et al, Cancer Cell, 2013.

  Dataset EGAD00001004791

• RNA Seq of 25 spheres derived from lymph nodes of lung cancer patients

  To further decipher the cell type composition within single spheres we performed RNA-Seq of 25 selected spheres of 4 different categories (including 8 signature-/balanced, 9 signature+/balanced, 1 signature-/aberrant, 7 signature+/aberrant). Samples were sequenced using Illumina NextSeq 2000.Fastq reads were processed using inhouse RNA-Seq workflow.

  Dataset EGAD00001011099

• Profiling RNA Translation in Pediatric Medulloblastoma

  This study provides RNA-sequencing and ribosome profiling data for patient-derived cell lines and patient tissue samples for children with medulloblastoma. Ribosome profiling is a variant protocol of RNA-sequencing that directly sequences ribosome-bound RNA fragments only. Associated RNA-seq and Ribo-seq data obtained separately for some cancer cell lines can be found on the NCBI SRA as PRJNA957428. Samples were processed for poly-A mRNA sequencing using the Roche Kapa Kit. Ribosome profiling was performed as described in the manuscript referenced below (Hofman et al.) and based on the article by McGlincy et al., Methods (2017). Ribo-seq data were analyzed for sample quality using RiboseQC (Calviello, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2020). These data were used to quantify P-sites of open reading frames. RNAseq and ribo-seq data were integrated and compared to determine translational efficiency values using TPM (Ribo-seq) over TPM (RNA-seq) as the metric. Ribo-seq data on 14 samples and RNAseq data on 21 samples derived from 16 fresh-frozen surgical samples for medulloblastoma and 5 autopsy samples are available through dbGaP. A second cohort of 4 medulloblastoma samples (RNAseq, Ribo-seq) related to this study can be found on the EGA at EGAS00001007426.

  Study phs003446

• HIPSD&R-seq enables scalable genomic copy number and transcriptome profiling

  Single-cell DNA-sequencing (scDNA-seq) enables decoding somatic cancer variation. Existing methods are hampered by low throughput or cannot be combined with transcriptome sequencing in the same cell. We propose HIPSD&R-seq (HIgh-throughPut Single-cell Dna and Rna-seq), a scalable yet simple and accessible assay to profile low-coverage DNA and RNA in thousands of cells in parallel. Our approach builds on a modification of the 10X Genomics platform for scATAC and multiome profiling. In applications to human cell models and primary tissue, we demonstrate the feasibility to detect rare clones and we combine the assay with combinatorial indexing to profile over 17,000 cells.

  Study EGAS50000000691

• RNA-seq from ASCENT cohort

  Bulk RNA sequencing data generated from primary resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumour tissue collected through the ASCENT study.

  Study EGAS50000001969

• Assessing gene expression profiling from FFPE Patient Samples: A Comparison of Two Library Preparation Approaches and Recommendations

  Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has transformed cancer research and clinical practice, with Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) driving advances in mutational profiling and personalized oncology. Yet, transcriptomic signatures remain essential for understanding disease mechanisms, including therapy resistance pathways. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), however, faces unique challenges when dealing with low-input or degraded RNA, as often found in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Although previous studies have compared library preparation protocols, rapidly evolving technologies call for updated evaluations. Here, we present a direct comparison of two FFPE-compatible stranded RNA-seq library preparation kits: TaKaRa™ SMARTer® Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 (Kit A) and Illumina Stranded Total RNA Prep Ligation with Ribo-Zero Plus (Kit B). Both kits generated high-quality RNA-seq data, yet important differences emerged. Notably, Kit A achieved comparable gene expression quantification to Kit B while requiring 20-fold less RNA input, a crucial advantage for limited samples, albeit with increased sequencing depth. We critically discuss these results in relation to RNA availability, technical performance, cost-effectiveness, processing time, and automation potential, offering practical guidance for selecting optimal RNA-seq strategies in clinical and translational research settings

  Study EGAS50000001066

• BPH Tissues for Cell Culture and Analysis - Spatial Transcriptomics Identifies Candidate Stromal Drivers of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

  The study goal was to apply spatial transcriptomics to identify candidate stromal drivers of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Laser microdissection (LCM) with RNA-seq of the stroma adjacent to hyperplastic and budding BPH ducts identified secreted factors including IGF1 and CXCL13. Single‐cell RNA sequencing (scRNA‐seq) revealed their co-expression from BPH fibroblasts. Additional studies sought to define similarities to embryonic prostate development, as well as therapeutic applications. Subjects were those who underwent prostatectomy for prostate or bladder cancer, with concurrent BPH, and who consented to use of surplus tissue for research studies. LCM/RNA-seq studies included 5 patients, and scRNA-seq studies included 1 patient. Phenotypic data submitted to this study include patient age, sex, prostate size, and international prostate symptom score (IPSS). Sequencing was done on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (LCM/RNAseq) and Illumina HiSeq X-Ten (scRNA-seq). The data processing pipeline utilized Kallisto (LCM/RNA-seq) and Cell Ranger (scRNA-seq). Data submitted are raw sequencing (Fastq) files.

  Study phs003477