11907 results for "coin buying fc 26 Visit Buyfc26coins.com for latest FC 26 coins news..2Dtf"

in 20.38 milliseconds.

• From research to data sharing: exploring EGA user's experiences

  The Cell Plasticity and Regeneration Group at the Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL focuses on the process of recruitment of macrophages that takes place in the small intestine during injury and healing. They recently published a paper titled “Mucosal Macrophages Govern Intestinal Regeneration in Response to Injury" in Gastroenterology Journal. As part of the research, some experiments were conducted using human intestinal organoid lines. These cells were processed for RNA sequencing, and the sequencing data were deposited at the EGA to be made available to the scientific community. When dealing with human genomic information, repositories must ensure the availability of the datasets while ensuring data protection. In this context, the European Genome-phenome Archive stands as a service for secure archiving and sharing of genetic, phenotypic and clinical data resulting from biomedical research. Following the recent publication of their paper, we took the opportunity to talk to Ilias Moraitis, first author, and Jordi Guiu, group leader, to find out about their experience with data sharing. Could you explain the focus of your research? In the lab, we study intestinal regeneration and how immune cells participate in this process. We use several techniques: engineered mouse models, image tracing, as well as mouse and human cells intestinal organoids. What challenges do you face regarding data management? We didn’t have a lot of problems. Always the informatic part, the data analysis, can give problems. But everything was smooth and working. We think it’s very important to deposit the data in repositories. For the mouse data it is very straightforward, but for us it was the first time depositing human data, which is sensitive because it comes from patients, and this is legally regulated. That’s why we thought about the EGA, and it was our first time. Why do you think it is important to submit data to repositories such as EGA? Because we think data is important for the science. Nowadays, we are sequencing a lot everywhere worldwide and having these resources shared with the scientific community it’s not only good for science, but it is also saving money and reducing costs. And there is so much data in there that can be used for other projects and for other questions. And it saves time! How was the process of submitting the data to the EGA? The communication worked very well but it was slower than we would like. But I think this is something we learn on the way. People usually wait until the last minute to do this before publication but if you know it in advance, you can start the process earlier. If you had to repeat the process, would you do anything differently? It’s like everything, isn’t it? For the first time you don’t know, you aren’t sure, but for the second time you know the steps, you know what to do and it’s faster. Of course, we would to do it earlier. Also, there were some things related to the control access that we didn’t know how to manage, but it was something more internal to us. Who is going to receive the communications and when, is our ethical committee going to evaluate this? All these technicalities that we didn’t know before starting this process, so we had to think about all these things. Next time it will be faster on our side. Do you have any suggestions for us to improve the submission process? Maybe we’ll need to ask our bioinformatician who did it! He was in charge of this part. Besides that, we think if the process were faster, it would be better for everyone. Also, in science a lot of times you have to do a lot of things at the very last minute, because of the nature of the experiments, or the need to accomplish for submitting a paper. Being faster in the process would be a plus. On your side, we went through the process and were able to find some information, but there were aspects we weren't aware of and weren't sure how to handle. I'm not sure if other institutes have different protocols for managing data requests or how they handle these internally. We believe the main issue lies in how the forms are filled out. Do you have any recommendations for other submitters? The main advice is to do this with enough time. Submit the data when you have the sequences, and don’t wait until the last minute. And then it can be under embargo, so you don’t need to make it public at that moment. As soon as you sequence, upload it and then it will be there for whenever you need to publish. How do you think we could encourage other researchers to submit their data? There are different layers here. One is that it is mandatory. You have to do this. The other is that we belong to a research community, to the same community and sharing this is making our research community stronger and more efficient. And then, also because this gives you visibility. The data is there, other people can analyse your data, and this also will bring citations to your papers. It has many advantages.

  Blog from-research-to-data-sharing

• Evaluating potential drug candidates for the treament of Henamgiopericytoma on patient derived cell line models

  Solitary fibrous tumor/Hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) is a rare subtype of soft tissue sarcoma associated with NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions. This study established and characterized a novel SFT/HPC patient-derived cell line called SFT-S1. Potential drug candidates that could be repurposed for the treatment of SFT/HPC were screened.

  Study EGAS50000000027

• HCC cfMeDIP-seq

  This dataset comprises 406 raw fastq files derived from 203 plasma cfDNA samples from 90 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The samples include 90 baseline HCC (b-HCC) samples, collected during liver transplant or resection surgeries, and 113 postoperative follow-up (f-HCC) samples. For each sample, 10ng of cfDNA was used for library preparation utilizing cfMeDIP-seq technology based on the 5mC antibody-immunoprecipitation strategy. Libraries were validated via Bioanalyzer trace analysis and sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 or HiSeq 2500 platform with paired-end 150-bp (NovaSeq) or 125-bp (HiSeq) model for ~100 million reads per sample.

  Dataset EGAD50000000651

• RNA sequencing of Notch inhibitor treated HCC PDX models across timepoints

  To study the effect of Notch inhibition on the transcriptional profiles our PDX models, we generated bulk RNA-seq data for two Notch inhibition sensitive and three Notch inhibition insensitive models across multiple timepoints (8h, 24h, 48h, 7d, 17d) using anti-JAG1, anti-Notch2, anti-Notch1 or anti-gD antibodies. 3-5 samples were collected for each treatment condition, resulting in a total of 96 samples. Isolated RNA was used as input for library preparation using TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit v2 (Illumina). The libraries were multiplexed and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) to produce FASTQ files.

  Dataset EGAD50000000737

• Transcriptomics for IMMU-SCCHN1 cohort

  The goal of IMMUcan is to understand how the immune system interacts with tumors and how therapeutic interventions influence this interaction. This cohort includes patients with confirmed locally recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who receive first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or ICI combined with chemotherapy. This dataset contains transcriptomics data processed with the STAR pipeline. Two sequencing kits were employed: Roche KAPA for high-quality RNA samples and Takara SMART-Seq Stranded for samples with limited RNA quantities.

  Dataset EGAD50000002206

• 10X single-cell Multiome (RNA+ATAC) and single-cell RNAseq of xenograft-derived HSPC, progenitors and myeloid progeny

  10X genomics chromium single-cell ATAC+RNA (Multiome) was use to prepare single-nucleus RNA- and ATAC-seq libraries for human HSPC sorted from xenografts recovered from inflammatory challenge. 10X genomics 3' kits were used to prepare single-cell RNA-seq libraries for committed progenitors and myeloid cells from the same xenografts. These were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSea 6000 platform; BAM files are provided. Samples from 3 conditions were sequenced for each cell type; 3 chromatin accessibility runs and 9 gene expression runs are provided.

  Dataset EGAD50000002328

• GenomeDenmark Phase 2 - MHC haplotypes

  The MHC vcf call set was generated using a modified AsmVar and BayesTyper pipeline. In contrast to the original pipeline, where variant calling is performed using alignment of collapsed assemblies to a reference genome, the MHC call set was produced using alignment of phased MHC haplotypes. Two iterations of BayesTyper was run, a first iteration for each haplotype seperately and a second iteration performing joint variant calling on all haplotypes. The sample IDs for the fathers and mothers are TrioID-01 and TrioID-02, respectively, and the IDs for the children are TrioID-0x, where x is a number between 3 and 7.

  Dataset EGAD00001003455

• H3K27ac/H3K27me3 landscape of medulloblastoma

  We profiled 111 patient medulloblastoma primary tumor samples by bulk RNA-seq (19 samples), 27ac (98 samples) / 27me3 (61 samples) ChIP-Seq, WGS (4 samples) and 27ac hichip (8 samples). Submitted data consists of data generated from previously unpublished tumors as well as complementary data for data sets already published for identical medulloblastoma tumors (ex: 27me3 ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq data submitted for a tumor with publicly available WGS data). The raw fastqs and hg19 aligned RNA-Seq bams are provided.

  Dataset EGAD00001009709

• IntEnd study

  Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from 643 colorectal adenomas collected in different hospitals in Norway, from which DNA was extracted, were analysed for DNA copy number alterations. Some adenomas had more than one block (n=42), thus 643 individuals, 685 blocks. Low-coverage whole genome sequencing was run in all samples. For 529 individuals all the clinical information was available. A subset was matched for follow-up time, age and sex in a nested case-control approach (n=366; cases - individuals who developed later on CRC; controls - individuals who did not develop CRC within the same follow-up time).

  Dataset EGAD00001010119

• CCA ChIP-seq data (63 CCA, 8 normal, 19 cell-line)

  Fastq files for H3K27ac ChIP-seq (with matched input-DNA control) for 63 CCAs, 8 normal bile duct tissues, 16 CCA cell-lines (including replicates), and 3 normal cholangiocyte cell-lines (including replicates). Library prep was performed with the NEBNext ChIP-seq library preparation kit. Each library (including matching input DNA) was sequenced to an average depth of 20 to 30 million raw reads on Illumina HiSeq4000 sequencer, with paired-end sequencing (except for 3 normal bile tissues done with single-end sequencing).

  Dataset EGAD00001012103