22992 results for "ega"

in 32.17 milliseconds.

• RNA-seq transcriptome of bronchial brush samples from COPD and control

  Human subjects (COPD patients or apparently healthy controls) where investigated by bronchoscopy and a 5 mm brush was used to sample the subsegment airways of the right lung. The material obtained mainly consist of bronchial epithelial cells plus some contamination with leukocytes. For further details see Ziegler-Heitbrock et al, European Respiratory Journal, 40:823-829, 2012.

  Dataset EGAD00001002003

• The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Data

  The dataset contains the whole genome sequencing data of a family with two unaffected parents and two probands that showed Hereditary spastic paraplegias symptoms. Sequencing reads were aligned to human genome (GRCh38) using BWA-MEM, followed by indel-realignment and PCR-duplicates marking. Alignment results are available for download in BAM format.

  Dataset EGAD00001002146

• RNA expression profiling of melanoma patient-derived xenograft

  Patient-derived xenografts (n=96) were derived from metastatic melanoma patients. RNA expression profiling will be preformed to study 1. HLA-typing and 2. the effect of the tumour microenvironment on tumour growth This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/

  Dataset EGAD00001002230

• BLUEPRINT release August 2016, Bisulfite-Seq for Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, on genome GRCh38

  Bisulfite-Seq data for 7 Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia sample(s). 132 run(s), 9 experiment(s), 14 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2016. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20160816/homo_sapiens/README_bisulphite_analysis_CNAG_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002313

• BLUEPRINT release August 2016, Bisulfite-Seq for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, on genome GRCh38

  Bisulfite-Seq data for 6 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia sample(s). 84 run(s), 6 experiment(s), 12 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2016. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20160816/homo_sapiens/README_bisulphite_analysis_CNAG_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002396

• BLUEPRINT release August 2016, Bisulfite-Seq for Multiple Myeloma, on genome GRCh38

  Bisulfite-Seq data for 5 Multiple Myeloma sample(s). 63 run(s), 7 experiment(s), 10 analysis(s) on human genome GRCh38. Part of BLUEPRINT release August 2016. Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20160816/homo_sapiens/README_bisulphite_analysis_CNAG_20160816

  Dataset EGAD00001002521

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from an adenocarcinoma of unknown primary cancer patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from an adenocarcinoma of unknown primary cancer patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001002606

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic gastric cancer patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic gastric cancer patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001004904

• Genotype data

  This dataset contains the imputed genotypes for 197 individuals. All individuals were genotyped with the Illumina HumanCoreExome-24 array. The individuals were phased with SHAPEIT and imputed to the 1000 Genomes Project Phase III using IMPUTE2. This dataset was generated as part of the following study: Panousis et al (2019). Combined genetic and transcriptome analysis of patients with SLE: Distinct, targetable signatures for susceptibility and severity

  Dataset EGAD00001005038

• NIHR BioResource Rare Diseases WGS project - Ehler-Danlos (ED) and ED-like Syndromes (EDS) Rare Disease domain

  Short read whole genome sequencing (WGS) CRAM files for the NIHR BioResource Rare Diseases WGS project – Participants from the Ehler-Danlos (ED) and ED-like Syndromes (EDS) Rare Disease domain.

  Dataset EGAD00001005123

• Cell type-specific transcriptomics of esophageal adenocarcinoma

  3' mRNA-Seq obtained from distinct isolated cell types (epithelia cells,immune cells, fibroblasts) of endoscopically obtained esophageal adenocarcinoma tissue as well as normal esophageal mucosa. Libraries for RNA-sequencing were prepared using the QuantSeq 3' mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit FWD for Illumina according to the low input protocol. Libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq 4000 (Illumina) by 1x 50 bases.

  Dataset EGAD00001005508

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic carcinoma of the lung patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic carcinoma of the lung patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) study

  Dataset EGAD00001002983

• TB-DAR Genotyping Study

  Active TB patients (sputum smear-positive and GeneXpert-positive) recruited at the Temeke District Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, as part of a prospective study that ran between November 2013 and June 2022 (TB-DAR cohort).

  Study EGAS00001007216

• FEGA and European GDI: working together to improve human health

  The Federated EGA is a global resource for discovery of and access to sensitive human omics and associated data consented for secondary use, through a network of human data repositories to accelerate biomedical research and improve human health. The Federated EGA network was launched in September 2022 with five inaugural nodes, and since 2023 seven operational nodes can share data across national borders in adherence to European and national laws. A few weeks after FEGA's official launch, in November 2022, the European Genomic Data Infrastructure (GDI) project was kicked-off . This European Commission co-funded project, coordinated by ELIXIR, is aimed to deliver federated, sustainable and secure data infrastructure to access genomic and related phenotypic and clinical data across Europe. This project supports the aim of the 1+MG initiative (25 EU countries, Norway and UK) to enable personalised medicine and health through a shared framework and infrastructure for securely accessing and integrating high quality genomic data and other health data across borders.1+MG will be an integral component of the European Health Data Space (EHDS) for secondary use (Healthdata@EU) as an authorised participant. How are Federated EGA and GDI similar? Given their shared visions, the Federated EGA and European GDI networks have a lot in common. To begin, they share the same overall goal of establishing networks of “nodes” that host sensitive human data within a jurisdiction and connecting these nodes in a global network to support data discovery and promote human genome data access for research and healthcare. FEGA and GDI are both initially focused on enabling access to human genomic data, while FEGA ambition is to expand the scope to clinical research data and other omics data in the future. FEGA and GDI are both built on open and interoperable software solutions, a subset of which are based on the LocalEGA components. FEGA and GDI implementation solutions are based on international community standards, for example those developed by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, which contributes to making them interoperable. Both FEGA and GDI allow for the nodes to make use of any solution that is fully compatible. As illustrated in Figure 1, a final key point is the significant overlap of institutions involved in envisioning and operating FEGA and GDI nodes, with the clear wish to keep them interoperable in the future. What distinguishes Federated EGA from GDI? Despite being largely similar, there are some differences between the FEGA and GDI networks, which we aim to clarify in this post. The first difference is the governance model that the nodes will operate to comply with national laws and GDPR. In the FEGA network, nodes have taken inspiration from the EGA data access model, where the infrastructure is a data processor of the hosted data and data controllership remains with the originating Data Access Committees (i.e. Data controllers) for each dataset. On the other hand, in the GDI network the controllership of datasets will be transferred to a 1+MG European Digital Infrastructure Consortium (EDIC) legal entity created by the Member States (MS), who will make data access decisions, with data holders having veto powers for their datasets. Importantly, FEGA nodes have the flexibility to choose another model to fit with their data protection framework, including becoming data controllers for their datasets. The second difference is the inclusion criteria for data. While FEGA nodes are designed to accept almost any type of omics data in need of control access (e.g. genomics, transcriptomics, genotyping, single cells sequencing, patient-tracked metagenomics), GDI nodes are initially, but not only, focused on accepting whole genome and exome sequencing data and affiliated data from sources such as (i) the Genome of Europe use case of the 1+MG initiative which specifically aims to fulfil the mission of building “a European network of national genomic reference cohorts of at least 500,000 citizens”) (ii) data collection of other types of genomic data identified by countries through the 1+MG dashboard and (iii) genomic data coming from data holders which would need to fulfil EHDS requirements. The third difference is the maturity of the software stacks. The FEGA network provides a set of software for data and metadata submission, storage, permissions management, and file distribution (the LocalEGA package). GDI is building a complete set of open source reference for the five functionalities covering the full data life cycle (a few more compared to the LocalEGA) including federated processing (analytics, AI/ML), which is still under active development. Notably, one of the GDI functionalities - storage and interfaces - can be satisfied by using the LocalEGA storage solution, highlighting the ability of FEGA and GDI to be interoperable. In both FEGA and GDI, nodes are allowed to use alternative solutions as long as they are fully interoperable with the networks. Figure 1 provides a simple overview of these described commonalities and differences. Figure1: schematic overview of the main commonalities and difference among a FEGA and a GDI node Can the same institute run a FEGA and a GDI node at the same time? The answer is Yes! We believe this is entirely possible and encouraged. As long as 1+MG requirements are continuously fulfilled in the implementation. The same trained personnel could operate the infrastructure and leverage the same national funding to run a FEGA and a GDI node. Several European nodes, especially GDI vanguard nodes like Norway, Sweden, Finland and Spain are following this model. The idea is that a lot of the work can be reused, given the overlapping scope and the interoperable technology. Thus, the hosted datasets can be discovered via the two catalogues, perhaps accessible under the same or different governance models. From a FEGA node perspective, the GDI datasets could simply be a subset of the datasets hosted in the FEGA node, which have their specific governance as any other. What's next? So, the amazing teams of people building the Federated EGA network and the European GDI network are working together to create infrastructures able to provide secure access to human genomic and associated data around Europe. Because we all know how much human genomics can improve healthcare and precision medicine. And we all want to collaborate to make it happen. This article has been reviewed collectively by members of the EGA and the GDI coordination team.

  Blog fega-and-gdi

• WTCCC case-control study for Coronary Artery Disease - Combined Controls

  WTCCC genome-wide case-control association study for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) using six disease collections together with the 1958 British Birth Cohort and the UK National Blood Service collections as controls.

  Study EGAS00000000004

• WTCCC case-control study for Type 1 Diabetes - Combined Controls

  WTCCC genome-wide case-control association study for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) using six disease collections together with the 1958 British Birth Cohort and the UK National Blood Service collections as controls.

  Study EGAS00000000015

• WTCCC case-control study for Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, T2D - combined cases

  WTCCC genome-wide case-control association study using the cardiovascular disease CAD, HT and T2D as combined case collection and the 1958 British Birth Cohort and the UK National Blood Service collections as controls.

  Study EGAS00000000005

• WGS_skin_punches

  We wish to understand the degree of copy number alterations in normal human sun exposed skin. We have collected small punches of epithelia and using a bait set design have shown the these span a clone. WGS will provide copy number information on these.

  Study EGAS00001004465

• WTCCC case-control study for Type 2 Diabetes - Combined Controls

  WTCCC genome-wide case-control association study for Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) using six disease collections together with the 1958 British Birth Cohort and the UK National Blood Service collections as controls.

  Study EGAS00000000017

• A new beta-globin mutation responsible of a beta-thalassemia (HbVar database ID 2928) was observed in 8 unrelated French families. The mutation carriers originated from Nord-Pas-de-Calais, a Northern French region where the chief town is Lille.5 unrelated mutation carriers were genotyped for a set of 12 microsatellites from chromosome 11, around the beta-globin gene. Among the 5 mutation carriers, 4 were genotyped for 97 European Ancestry Informative SNPs (EAIMs). 32 controls from Nord-Pas-de-Calais were genotyped for the microsatellites and SNPs.

  Dac EGAC00001000245

• Cancer Genome Project Exome Sequencing

  Agilent whole exome hybridisation capture was performed on genomic DNA derived from cancer and matched normal DNA from the same patients. Next Generation sequencing performed on the resulting exome libraries and mapped to build 37 of the human reference genome to facilitate the identification of novel cancer genes. Now we aim to re find and validate the findings of those exome libraries using bespoke pulldown methods and sequencing the products.

  Dataset EGAD00001000289

• SC_DDD-G-3

  Unfiltered genotype data for DDD Study trios (patient and parents) (N=2,166 samples), some of which were used for replication of neurodevelopmental disorder polygenic risk (Niemi et al., Nature 2018). Samples were genotyped on the Illumina HumanOmniExpress BeadChip

  Dataset EGAD00010001602

• ChIP-sequencing fragment coverage

  Raw sequencing reads from H3K27ac ChIP and input DNA from lymphoblastoid cells of three TET2 mutation carriers and two wild-type family members were quality and adapter trimmed with cutadapt version 1.16 in Trim Galore version 0.3.7 using default parameters. Trimmed reads were aligned to hs37d5 reference genome using Bowtie2 (version 2.1.0). Duplicate reads were removed with samtools rmdup (v1.7). Fragment coverage of paired-end reads was calculated from bam files with BEDtools genomecov (v2.26.0).

  Dataset EGAD00010001671

• HIPO016 - glioblastoma tumour methylation microarray profiling

  Methylation microarray profiling (Illumina Human Methylation 450k and EPIC platforms) of 60 adult glioblastomas. Tumours were subtyped using the approach from Sturm et al. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.08.024): 12 IDH, 18 MES, 12 RTK I, 18 RTK II. DNA was prepared, assayed on the microarrays, and raw data computationally processed as described in Capper et al., "DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours": https://www.nature.com/articles/nature26000

  Dataset EGAD00010001797

• Breast Cancer Histology Images

  Fresh frozen breast cancer H&E tissue images collected and annotated by the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC), that included the BASIS collaboration. Associated with whole genome sequence data as originally described by Nik-Zainal et al, Nature, 2016 (DOI: 10.1038/nature17676) and deposited with ID EGAS00001001178

  Dataset EGAD00010001911