17198 results for "free coins in fc 26 Visit Buyfc26coins.com for latest FC 26 coins news..xwWa"

in 21.12 milliseconds.

• In this study, blood-brain barrier (BBB)-forming brain endothelial-like cells were generated from apolipoprotein E gene allele E4 (APOE4, high AD risk) and allele E3 (APOE3, lower AD risk) carrying patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Cells were subsequently exposed to focused ultrasound and microbubbles (FUS+MB) to induce BBB opening and their transcriptome analysed. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) results demonstrated minimal changes in the gene expression following FUS+MB suggesting safety of FUS+MB application in the clinical setting.

  The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a major impediment to therapeutic intracranial drug delivery for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Focused ultrasound applied together with microbubbles (FUS+MB) is a novel technique to transiently open the BBB and increase drug delivery. Evidence suggests that FUS+MB is safe, however the effects of FUS+MB on human BBB cells, especially in relation to AD, remain sparsely investigated. Here we developed a human sporadic AD BBB cell platform to investigate the effects of FUS+MB on BBB cells and screen for the delivery of two potentially therapeutic AD antibodies. We generated BBB cells from apolipoprotein E gene allele E4 (APOE4, high AD risk) and allele E3 (APOE3, lower AD risk) carrying patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). We utilized this robust and reproducible platform to demonstrate increased delivery of potentially therapeutic antibodies across the BBB, including an analogue of Aducanumab (AduhelmTM) following FUS+MB treatment. Our results also demonstrate the safety of FUS+MB indicated by minimal changes in the cell transcriptome as well as little or no changes in cell viability and inflammatory responses within first 24 h post FUS+MB, with potentially important implications in a clinical setting. Finally, we report a more physiologically relevant hydrogel-based 2.5D BBB model as a key development for FUS+MB-mediated drug delivery screening, with potentially higher translational utility. Our results provide an important advancement for identifying FUS+MB-deliverable drugs and screening for cell- and patient-specific effects of FUS+MB, accelerating its use as a therapy in AD.

  Study EGAS00001005944

• Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Exploration by Next-Generation Sequencing in Multi-Ethnic Samples (T2D-GENES) Follow-Up Study: BioMe Biobank Program

  The ~52,000 sample Type 2 Diabetes Exome Sequencing project is a collaboration of six consortia with various funding mechanisms that have joined together to investigate genetic variants for type 2 diabetes (T2D) using the largest T2D case/control sample set compiled to date. This includes samples from: Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Exploration by Next-generation sequencing in Multi-Ethnic Samples (T2D-GENES) Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes (GoT2D) Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Slim Initiative in Genomic Medicine for the Americas (SIGMA) Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalised Disease Prediction, Prevention, and Care (LuCAMP) Progress in Diabetes Genetics in Youth (ProDIGY) This data generated from the BioMe Biobank cohort was part of the T2D-GENES (Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Exploration by Next-generation sequencing in multi-Ethnic Samples) consortium, which is a NIDDK-funded international research consortium that seeks to identify genetic variants for type 2 diabetes (T2D) through multiethnic sequencing studies. The T2D-GENES Project is a multi-ethnic sequencing study designed to assess whether less common variants play a role in T2D risk and to assess similarities and differences in the distribution of T2D risk variants across ancestry groups. The individuals were obtained from over 20 cohorts across the 6 consortia that are listed in Table 1. The strategy was to perform deep exome sequencing of individuals, 24,991 with T2D and 24,953 controls, divided among five ancestry groups: Europeans, East Asians, South Asians, American Hispanics, and African Americans. The T2D-GENES, ProDIGY and SIGMA studies, sequencing was performed at the Broad Institute using the Agilent v2 capture reagent or Illumina Rapid Capture on Illumina HiSeq machines. Please note that while we summarize the full sample list in publications and below, two of the cohorts below are not in dbGAP, due to the samples not being consented for deposition. This includes the Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg (KORA) study and Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalised Disease Prediction, Prevention, and Care (LuCamp) study. The Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) was deposited in dbGAP as part of their initial study and the phs numbers for that project can be found here: https://esp.gs.washington.edu/drupal/dbGaP_Releases. Table 1. 52,000 sample T2D Case/Control Whole Exome Sequencing Studies Ancestry Consortia Study Countries of Origin # Cases # Controls African American T2D-GENES Project 1 Jackson Heart Study US 502 527 African American T2D-GENES Project 1 Wake Forest School of Medicine Study US 518 532 African American ESP Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) US 467 1374 African American T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study BioMe Biobank Program (BioMe) US 1294 1254 East Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 Korea Association Research Project Korea 526 561 East Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 and Follow-Up Study Singapore Diabetes Cohort Study; Singapore Prospective Study Program Singapore (Chinese) 1486 1568 East Asian T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Korea SNUH South Korea 450 475 East Asian T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Research Studies in Hong Kong (Hong Kong) Hong Kong 493 485 European T2D-GENES Project 1 Ashkenazi US, Israel 506 355 European T2D-GENES Project 1 Metabolic Syndrome in Men Study (METSIM) Finland 484 498 European GoT2D Finland-United States Investigation of NIDDM Genetics (FUSION) Study Finland 472 476 European GoT2D Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg (KORA) Germany 97 90 European GoT2D UK Type 2 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (UKT2D) UK 322 320 European GoT2D Malmö-Botnia Study Finland, Sweden 478 443 European LuCamp Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalised Disease Prediction, Prevention, and Care (LuCamp) Denmark 997 997 European ESP Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) US 390 2843 European T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Genetics of Diabetes and Audit Research Tayside Study (GoDARTS) Scotland, UK 960 966 European T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Framingham Heart Study (FHS) US 396 596 Hispanic T2D-GENES Project 1 San Antonio Family Heart Study, San Antonio Family Diabetes/ Gallbladder Study, Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study, and the Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes Study Family Component US 272 218 Hispanic T2D-GENES Project 1 and SIGMA v2 Starr County, Texas US 1762 1738 Hispanic SIGMA v1 Mexico City Diabetes Study Mexico 281 549 Hispanic SIGMA v1 and SIGMA v2 Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) US 1476 1443 Hispanic SIGMA v1 and SIGMA v2 UNAM/INCMNSZ Diabetes Study (UIDS) Mexico 1998 1977 Hispanic SIGMA v1 and SIGMA v2 Diabetes in Mexico Study (DMS) Mexico 1522 1546 Multiethnic ProDIGY Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) US 3097 0 Multiethnic ProDIGY SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) US 553 0 South Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 London Life Sciences Population Study (LOLIPOP) UK (Indian Asian) 531 538 South Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 and Follow-Up Study Singapore Indian Eye Study Singapore (Indian Asian) 1640 1478 South Asian T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Pakistan Genomic Resource (PGR) Pakistan 914 932 The BioMe Biobank study contributed 1294 cases and 1254 controls to T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study.

  Study phs001490

• Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Exploration by Next-generation Sequencing in Multi-Ethnic Samples (T2D-GENES) Follow up Study: Pakistan Genomic Resource (PGR)

  The ~52,000 sample Type 2 Diabetes Exome Sequencing project is a collaboration of six consortia with various funding mechanisms that have joined together to investigate genetic variants for type 2 diabetes (T2D) using the largest T2D case/control sample set compiled to date. This includes samples from: Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Exploration by Next-generation sequencing in Multi-Ethnic Samples (T2D-GENES) Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes (GoT2D) Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Slim Initiative in Genomic Medicine for the Americas (SIGMA) Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalised Disease Prediction, Prevention, and Care (LuCAMP) Progress in Diabetes Genetics in Youth (ProDIGY) This data generated from the Pakistan Genomic Resource (PGR) cohort was part of the T2-GENES (Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Exploration by Next-generation sequencing in multi-Ethnic Samples) consortium, which is a NIDDK-funded international research consortium that seeks to identify genetic variants for type 2 diabetes (T2D) through multiethnic sequencing studies. The T2D-GENES Project is a multi-ethnic sequencing study designed to assess whether less common variants play a role in T2D risk and to assess similarities and differences in the distribution of T2D risk variants across ancestry groups. The individuals were obtained from over 20 cohorts across the 6 consortia that are listed in Table 1. The strategy was to perform deep exome sequencing of individuals, 24,991 with T2D and 24,953 controls, divided among five ancestry groups: Europeans, East Asians, South Asians, American Hispanics, and African Americans. The T2D-GENES, ProDIGY and SIGMA studies, sequencing was performed at the Broad Institute using the Agilent v2 capture reagent or Illumina Rapid Capture on Illumina HiSeq machines. Please note that while we summarize the full sample list in publications and below, two of the cohorts below are not in dbGAP, due to the samples not being consented for deposition. This includes the Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg (KORA) study and Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalised Disease Prediction, Prevention, and Care (LuCamp) study. The Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) was deposited in dbGAP as part of their initial study and the phs numbers for that project can be found here: https://esp.gs.washington.edu/drupal/dbGaP_Releases. Table 1. 52,000 sample T2D Case/Control Whole Exome Sequencing Studies Ancestry Consortia Study Countries of Origin # Cases # Controls African American T2D-GENES Project 1 Jackson Heart Study US 502 527 African American T2D-GENES Project 1 Wake Forest School of Medicine Study US 518 532 African American ESP Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) US 467 1374 African American T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study BioMe Biobank Program (BioMe) US 1297 1256 East Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 Korea Association Research Project Korea 526 561 East Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 and Follow-Up Study Singapore Diabetes Cohort Study; Singapore Prospective Study Program Singapore (Chinese) 1486 1568 East Asian T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Korea SNUH South Korea 450 475 East Asian T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Research Studies in Hong Kong (Hong Kong) Hong Kong 493 485 European T2D-GENES Project 1 Ashkenazi US, Israel 506 355 European T2D-GENES Project 1 Metabolic Syndrome in Men Study (METSIM) Finland 484 498 European GoT2D Finland-United States Investigation of NIDDM Genetics (FUSION) Study Finland 472 476 European GoT2D Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg (KORA) Germany 97 90 European GoT2D UK Type 2 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (UKT2D) UK 322 320 European GoT2D Malmö-Botnia Study Finland, Sweden 478 443 European LuCamp Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Applied Medical Genomics in Personalised Disease Prediction, Prevention, and Care (LuCamp) Denmark 997 997 European ESP Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) US 390 2843 European T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Genetics of Diabetes and Audit Research Tayside Study (GoDARTS) Scotland, UK 960 966 European T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Framingham Heart Study (FHS) US 396 596 Hispanic T2D-GENES Project 1 San Antonio Family Heart Study, San Antonio Family Diabetes/ Gallbladder Study, Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study, and the Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes Study Family Component US 272 218 Hispanic T2D-GENES Project 1 and SIGMA v2 Starr County, Texas US 1762 1738 Hispanic SIGMA v1 Mexico City Diabetes Study Mexico 281 549 Hispanic SIGMA v1 and SIGMA v2 Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) US 1476 1443 Hispanic SIGMA v1 and SIGMA v2 UNAM/INCMNSZ Diabetes Study (UIDS) Mexico 1998 1977 Hispanic SIGMA v1 and SIGMA v2 Diabetes in Mexico Study (DMS) Mexico 1522 1546 Multiethnic ProDIGY Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) US 3097 0 Multiethnic ProDIGY SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) US 553 0 South Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 London Life Sciences Population Study (LOLIPOP) UK (Indian Asian) 531 538 South Asian T2D-GENES Project 1 and Follow-Up Study Singapore Indian Eye Study Singapore (Indian Asian) 1640 1478 South Asian T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study Pakistan Genomic Resource (PGR) Pakistan 903 930 The PGR study contributed 903 cases and 930 controls to T2D-GENES Follow-Up Study.

  Study phs001552

• Genome Wide Association Studies in ECOG 2997 Trial

  The ECOG 2997 trial was a randomized controlled trial for patients with previously untreated CLL comparing fludarabine monotherapy to the combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The initial clinical findings of this study were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2007 (JCO 25:793-8). Additional laboratory studies have also published (JCO 25:799-804).

  Study phs000621

• Heterogeneity and evolution of DNA mutation rates in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer

  A mutation accumulation experiment in colorectal cancer (CRC) derived tumoroids, aimed at measuring the spontaneous rates of accumulation of new single-nucleotide sequence variations in seven microsatellite stable CRCs and one microsatellite unstable CRC. Mutations accumulated over six+six months were identified via whole genome sequencing of clonal tumoroids. 150x WGS for 7 samples.

  Study EGAS50000000425

• Target sequencing of 11 hereditary breast cancer genes in Japanese

  We performed a case control association study for variants in coding regions of 11 hereditary breast cancer genes in 7,051 female unselected breast cancer patients, 11,241 female controls, 53 male patients, and 12,490 male controls of Japanese ancestry. The 11 genes were ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, NF1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, and TP53.

  Study JGAS000140

• Signals of positive selection in Peruvians from three ecological regions

  In this study, genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data (Illumina Infinium® MEGA array) was gathered for 200 individuals distributed across Perú, and then analyzed to investigate signals of recent positive selection specific to populations living in the high-altitude environments of the Andes, the arid Pacific coast and the Amazon rainforest.

  Study EGAS00001005692

• Single-cell RNA sequencing dissects gene-environment interactions on gene expression and regulation in immune cells.

  This study aims to dissect gene-environment interactions on gene expression and regulation in immune cells using scRNA-seq data from 120 donors being stimulated with 3 pathogens, for 2 different timepoints. More specifically, we identified context- and cell-type-specific eQTLs and co-expression QTLs in PBMCs.

  Study EGAS00001005376

• PRDM9 loss of function follow up from Born-in-Bradford Autozygosity sequencing

  In the autozygosity exome sequencing of Born-in-Bradford samples of Pakistani origin there is a mother who is homozygous for an apparent truncating stop codon in PRDM9, the gene responsible for localising recombination during meiosis. We plan to deep sequence mother and child with X10, and physically phase the mother with PacBio sequencing. We will use this data to identify recombination locations, and test whether these are consistent with the known fine scale recombination map. Data Access is controlled by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute DAC and the Born In Bradford Executive Group.

  Dataset EGAD00001001686

• EGA metadata schema

  EGA Schemas In this page, you will find information on how the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) manages its metadata standards using both XML Schema Definition (XSD) and JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) formats. If you are not sure what this means, you may want to explore our brief metadata introduction. This information may be of your interest if you are planning to learn more about how the EGA is built and how to wrap around it for other processes. Nevertheless, if you are a common user (e.g. submitter or requester), you would not have to worry about these schemas nor their format, since they are implemented in user-friendly ways for you. Metadata standards are rules that define how to format and structure data of metadata objects (i.e. entities), like EGA's samples or experiments in a consistent manner. These objects are the nodes of the metadata model of the EGA (Figure 1). Figure 1. Diagram of EGA's metadata model. The model's building blocks are objects (e.g. sample), which can reference each other (e.g. an experiment referencing the used samples). Once your files are uploaded, they can also be referenced by Runs and Analyses. The submission object is an object itself that compiles many others. At EGA, we inherit our metadata schemas from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), and we have expanded them to include bespoke objects such as "Policy", "Dataset", and "DAC" (Data Access Committee) for our specific use-case: handling sensitive human data. See below a list of all our metadata objects and some context for each. Metadata Object EGA accession Description Examples of metadata fields Study EGAS… Information about the study Study type, study title, study abstract… Sample EGAN… Information about the used samples in the experiment or analysis Taxon ID, scientific name, biological sex, phenotype… Experiment EGAX… Information about the performed experiment Used libraries, sequencing platform, reference to the used samples… Analysis EGAZ… Contains information about the analysis Type of analysis, used assembly, reference sequence… Run EGAR… The run holds information about the files containing the raw reads generated in a run of sequencing Platform, spot descriptor, raw file references… DAC EGAC… Contains information about the Data Access Committee (DAC) DAC contacts, contact emails… Policy EGAP… Contains the Data Access Agreement (DAA) and policy which its usage complies with Policy text, data use ontologies (DUO) codes… Dataset EGAD… Contains the collection of runs/analysis to be subject to controlled access Dataset type, compilation of Run's and Analysis' IDs There are two different sets of schemas, based on their formats, in which the EGA accepts metadata: XSDs (for XML files) and JSON Schemas (for JSON files). EGA's XML Schema Definition . When programmatic submissions are pushed through the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) system, XML format is used. The schemas that are applied for this format are defined in XML Schema Definition (XSD) files, which can be found at ENA's GitHub repository. You can find more information on how to validate and submit your data programmatically in our programmatic submission documentation. Furthermore, see at our GitHub repository some XML examples with either made-up values (similar to what you would submit) or descriptive values for each field (just for documentation). EGA's JSON Metadata Schemas . When programmatic submissions are pushed through the Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) system, JSON format specifications are used instead. See the full JSON specifications for further details. In conclusion, the EGA metadata schemas are crucial for maintaining the quality and consistency of submitted data. By understanding and following the rules outlined in these schemas, you can ensure that your submissions comply with the EGA's standards and contribute to a valuable and accessible genomic resource. Sample checklists Besides the standards in our schemas, we have another layer called Sample checklists. These are another system that the EGA inherits from ENA, and specifies what attributes are required or allowed for a sample object. The EGA uses these checklists to enforce that, for example, a sample object has the three mandatory attributes: subject ID, sex and phenotype of the individual the sample was taken from. When you submit to EGA, our checklist is automatically selected by default.

  Documentation submission/metadata/ega-schema