12300 results for "u7buy fc points Visit Buyfc26coins.com for latest FC 26 coins news..4F5O"

in 14.03 milliseconds.

• Genome Diversity in Africa Project - GemCode libraries (2017-07-05)

  High depth whole genome sequencing from GemCode (10x Genomics) DNA libraries containing long range linkage information for one Baganda trio and one Baganda child (parent already sequenced at high depth). This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/ This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2017-07-05.

  Dataset EGAD00001003426

• BLUEPRINT September 2016, ChIP-Seq for thymocyte from thymus, on Genome GRCh38

  ChIP-Seq data for 5 sample(s) for thymocyte from thymus, on Genome GRCh38. 17 run(s), 17 experiment(s), 17 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT (September 2016).Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_chipseq_analysis_ebi_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001002947

• Metastatic breast cancer targeted gene screen (2017-05-11)

  The samples will be sequenced for a targeted panel of cancer relevant genes (n ~ 370) and analysed for somatic mutations. This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2017-05-11.

  Dataset EGAD00001003330

• IBD Whole Genome Sequencing (2019-04-01)

  We will sequence at 15X coverage the genomes of 1536 IBD patients. These samples are currently onsite at Sanger and made available for sequencing via our collaboration with the UK IBD Genetics consortium. This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/ . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2019-04-01.

  Dataset EGAD00001004880

• Oceanian and American population sequencing and phasing (2019-04-11)

  Whole-genome sequencing of human individuals from Polynesian and Native American populations, as well as 10x Genomics Chromium data from Polynesian, Native American and Aboriginal Australian populations, allowing for experimental phasing of haplotypes. This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/ . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2019-04-11.

  Dataset EGAD00001004951

• Colon Cancer Organoid Cultures and Tumors Whole Exome Sequencing Data

  Five hundred fifty nanograms of genomic DNA were input for library preparation after fragmentation by Covaris S2, following the KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KR0961-V1.14) protocols, with selection for a library size range of 250-450 bp. Three hundred nanograms per library DNA each from 12 samples were normalized and combined into a single pool for exome capture using the xGen Lockdown Probes and Reagents based on their standard protocols

  Dataset EGAD00001005754

• RNA Sequencing datasets - Project "Multi-omics analysis of Parkinson’s disease midbrains"

  The dataset contains FASTQ files referring to the study "Multi-omics analysis of Parkinson’s disease midbrains". For this project, RNA was isolated from human postmortem midbrain tissue (PD and Control samples). Libraries were prepared with the TruSeq Small RNA library prep (Small RNA Seq) and the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Kit (for transcriptomics), both from Illumina. Sequencing for both experimental setups was conducted in the Illumina HiSeq4000.

  Dataset EGAD00001006883

• Genome-wide Association Study for Non-syndromic Clefts in the African Population: CIDR

  The focus of this project is to identify genetic variants that are associated with orofacial clefts in African populations in sub-Saharan Africa. Most genetic studies of CLP (including the vast majority of GWAS) have been conducted in populations of European origin with only a few focused on Asian or African populations. We choose to study the genetics of these complex traits in African populations because, African populations have the greatest genetic variation amongst the various populations in the world by virtue of being the primary ancestral population to modern humans (Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman, 2003; Ramsay et al., 2011). Therefore, the potential for finding novel loci for CLP is quite high. To date 6 genome wide association studies (GWAS) for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) have been conducted and 18 risk loci identified (Birnbaum et al., 2009; Grant et al., 2009 ; Beaty et al., 2010; Mangold et al., 2010; Ludwig et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2015). All these studies have either been conducted in European populations, Asian populations or both. There is currently no published GWAS for clefts in African populations. African populations represent a novel and richly productive populations for genetic and environmental exposure studies for CL/P. Investigating the presence of genetic variants in diverse population groups can identify novel variants and candidate genes that are population specific. Environmental factors may also increase the risks in certain population groups due to genetic susceptibility and/or specific exposures. Understanding the role these susceptibility genes play in the effects of environmental risk factors can inform strategies designed towards reducing the outcome of these complex traits, e.g. through the modification of the environmental influences. The study population comprises a large number of individuals (3205 individuals) from Africa (Ghana, Ethiopia and Nigeria). There are cases, case triads (nuclear families), as well as controls with no history of OFC nor other developmental defects.

  Study phs001090

• National Institute on Aging - Late Onset Alzheimer's Disease Family Study: Genome-Wide Association Study for Susceptibility Loci

  Alzheimer disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorder of the elderly affecting an estimated five million Americans. Genetic factors contribute to the risk for disease with heritability estimates ranging from 57% to 79%. More than a decade ago, the ε4 variant of APOE was identified and remains the most consistently replicated genetic variant influencing the risk of late onset Alzheimer disease. A segregation analysis suggests there may be four additional genes influencing the age-at-onset of Alzheimer disease. In 2007 there were 968 association studies in 398 candidate genes reported, but none replicated consistently. There are many reasons for the lack of consistency, but one important reason for the lack of progress is the paucity of a sufficient number of well characterized families and patients available to the entire scientific community. The extensive effort and expense required to ascertain such a population has been addressed by the NIA-LOAD Family Study. Its goal is to identify and recruit families with two or more siblings with the late-onset form of Alzheimer's disease and a cohort of unrelated, non-demented controls similar in age and ethnic background, and to make the samples, the clinical and genotyping data and preliminary analyses available to qualified investigators world-wide. Genotyping by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) was performed using the Illumina Infinium II assay protocol with hybridization to Illumina Human 610Quadv1_B Beadchips. This genotyping represents the largest collection of families ever assembled with Alzheimer's disease combining the NIA-LOAD Genetics Initiative Multiplex Family Study, the National Cell Repository for Alzheimer's Disease (NCRAD) with additional controls from the University of Kentucky. These genotyping results will serve as a focal point for future research that will identify all of the remaining genetic variants in Alzheimer's disease.

  Study phs000168

• Best Practices for DACs

  Best Practices Data access committees (DACs) are institutional safeguards responsible for ensuring a balance between data protection and accessibility. However, there are no procedural standards that apply across DACs, which can lead to inconsistencies in their reviews and compromise their quality and effectiveness. Standardising DAC processes can foster trust and mutual recognition, paving the way for greater coordination, collaboration, and delegation between DACs and other oversight bodies to improve the efficiency of data access without sacrificing protection. To provide guidance, the following are suggestions for actions a DAC might take upon receiving a data access request: Aim to respond to all initial requests in less than 2 weeks. Failure to do so may result in follow-up emails from the EGA, journals, and ultimately dataset withdrawal. First, check that the data/EGAD number is consistent with your data submission. In other words, ensure that the requester has contacted the correct DAC. Verify that the user will be using the data within the terms of consent by asking them to sign up to the terms within the DAA. Ensure that data users who are granted access to the data comply with the terms of a Data Access Agreement (DAA) and to use the data only in approved ways. Look for an institutional email address for the requester. Search for evidence that the requester is "appropriately qualified/bona fide" for using the data, for example on PubMed, Research Gate, LinkedIn, etc. Confirm that the affiliated organisation is real and that the requester still works there. Inquire with the requester about who should have accounts created at the EGA under the terms of the agreement. If a negative decision is made, promptly communicate it to the requester and support it with the terms of the Data Access Policy that the requester has not met or cannot meet. Keep the information in the DAC up to date. If you leave your institution and are unable to manage data access requests on their behalf, you should add your replacement as a new contact in the DAC. Assist with data access requests for any further questions related to your data. The EGA can only check information that has been deposited in the repository. If the user has a specific question that the EGA cannot answer, we will redirect the user to the DAC. All the EGA studies and datasets referenced in a publication under your DAC must be publicly searchable on the EGA website before the paper is released. If possible, describe the permitted purposes for subsequent research projects, including associated limits and conditions, for all resources hosted in a repository using a common ontology, such as the GA4GH Data Use Ontology (DUO). It is considered best practice to try and release data only to those with an institutional email address. This gives reassurance to the EGA, research participants, and the general public that an appropriate individual is accessing and using the data. To prevent potential data breaches and ensure adherence to GDPR regulations, it is essential that the European Genome-Phenome Archive (EGA) is informed via the Helpdesk team of any changes to the Data Access Committee (DAC). This should be done in addition to any changes being made on the DAC portal. Data Controllers (as per the definition in the DPA) are also responsible for notifying the previous DAC of any modifications. Without proper notification, changes might not be automatically updated in our system, leading to the risk of incorrect permissions being applied and potential data access issues. Therefore, it is imperative that all Data Controllers follow this protocol to maintain data integrity and security.

  Documentation access/data-access-committee/best-practices