6365 results for "11+1双色球多少钱一注"

in 21.34 milliseconds.

• IMCISION DNAseq

  Whole-exome sequencing of 32 primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma samples prior to treatment with neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 (n=6) or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 (n=26) immunotherapy. DNA quantity used: 50ng. Library Preparation Kit: Twist Human Core Exome Plus (Twist Bioscience). Sequencing parameters: NovaSeq 6000, 2x 100 bp. File type: fastQ.

  Dataset EGAD00001008139

• Characterization_of_individual_foci_of_multicentric_multifocal_breast_cancer_using_targeted_next_generation_sequencing

  Multifocality or multicentricity in breast cancer may be defined as the presence of two or more tumor foci within a single quadrant of the breast or within different quadrants of the same breast, respectively. This original classification of the breast cancer as multicentric or multifocal was based on the assumption that cancers arising in the same quadrant were more likely to arise from the same ductal structures than those occurring in separate areas of the breast. The problem with these definitions is that the “quadrants” of the breast are arbitrary external designations, as no internal boundaries do exist. This project will therefore focus both on synchronous multifocal and multicentric tumors. The incidence of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers was reported to be between 13 and 75% depending on the definition used, the extent of the pathologic sampling of the breast and whether in situ disease is considered evidence of multicentricity (1). Although this incidence is variable, those figures show that it is a frequent phenomenon. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic management of the cancer. Multifocality or multicentricity has been associated with a number of more aggressive features including an increased rate of regional lymph node metastases and adverse patient outcome when compared with unifocal tumors (2-3), and a possible increased risk of local recurrence following breast conserving surgery (4). For the moment, the literature is divided on whether there is a corresponding impact on survival outcomes. Today, the current convention to stage and to treat multifocal and multicentric tumors is the classical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging guidelines with which tumor size is assessed by the largest tumor focus without taking other foci of disease into consideration. If some papers, as the recent one from Lynch and colleagues, support the current staging convention (3), others, however, as Boyages et al. suggested that aggregate size and not the size of the largest lesion should be considered in order to refine the prognostic assessment of those tumors (5). On the top of that, the question whether multifocal/multicentric carcinomas are due to the spread of a single carcinoma throughout the breast or is due to multiple carcinomas arising simultaneously has been a matter of debate. Some studies suggested that multifocal breast cancer may result from either intramammary spread from a single primary tumor or multiple synchronous primary tumors; whereas others suggest that multiple breast carcinomas always arise from the same clone (6-8). Recently, Pietri and colleagues analyzed the biological characterization of a series of 113 multifocal/multicentric breast cancers (8) which were diagnosed over a 5-year period. The expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors, Ki-67 proliferative index, expression of HER2 and tumor grading were prospectively determined in each tumor focus, and mismatches among foci were recorded. Mismatches in ER status were present in 5 (4.4%) cases and PgR in 18 (15.9%) cases. Mismatches in tumor grading were present in 21 cases (18.6%), proliferative index (Ki-67) in 17 (15%) cases and HER2 status in 11 (9.7%) cases. Interestingly, this heterogeneity among foci has led to 14 (12.4%) patients receiving different adjuvant treatments compared with what would have been indicated if we had only taken into account the biologic status of the primary tumor. This study therefore showed that differences in biological characteristics of multifocal/multicentric lesions play a crucial role in the adjuvant treatment decision making process. In this study, we will concentrate on a larger series of patients with multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer lesions. We aim at: 1. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality according to the different breast cancer molecular subtypes (ER-/HER2-, HER2+, ER+/HER2-). 2. Evaluating the incidence of multifocality in patients with hereditary breast cancer disease (presence of germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations). Moreover, we would like to investigate if multifocal lesions with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations exhibit a characteristic combination of substitution mutation signatures and a distinctive profile of deletions as demonstrated recently by Nik-Zainal and colleagues (9). 3. Correlating multifocality with clinical information in order to define its influence on patients’ survival (DFS and OS). 4. Carrying high coverage targeted gene sequencing of driver cancer genes and genes whose mutation is of therapeutic importance in order to compare clinically-relevant genetic differences between several multifocal breast cancer lesions. 5. Evaluating the impact of the distance between the different lesions on the clinical outcome but also on the genetic differences. 6. Comparing gene expression patterns between several multifocal breast cancer lesions and correlate them with the results of the targeted genes screen. 7. Characterizing the genomic and transcriptomic status of cancer related genes in metastatic lesions (local recurrence, positive lymph node or distant metastatic sites) from the same multifocal invasive ductal breast cancer patients in order to evaluate the consequence of genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity of multifocal lesions on metastatic lesions. Multiple (multifocal/multicentric) breast carcinomas, especially when occurring in the same breast, represent a real challenge for both pathologists and clinicians in terms of identifying the cellular origin and the best therapeutic choice. This project has the potential to identify genetic/transcriptomic differences existing between several lesions constituting multifocal breast cancers, which in the routine clinical practice are usually considered to be homogeneous among them. We foresee validating significant results in a larger series of patients and this, in turn, could have a remarkable impact on the treatment and clinical management of multifocal breast cancers. Indeed, we hope to provide some evidence whether or not each focus matters in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer to define the adequate therapeutic approach, especially in the context of targeted therapies. The work to be done at Sanger will be target gene screen pooling of 1400 samples.

  Study EGAS00001000407

• EGAD00010000628

  The TEENAGE study target population comprised adolescent students aged 13 to 15 years attending the first three classes of public secondary schools located in the wider Athens area of Attica.

  Dataset EGAD00010000628

• Average_hypermethylation_TF_sites

  Average hypermethylation on transcription factor binding sites based on nanopolish calls; only positions showing higher methylation than sample’s average methylation at enhancers were included when defining the average methylation level. Data from 6 individuals at different time points.

  Dataset EGAD00010002411

• Whole Genome - Uveal Melanoma

  Whole genome sequencing on 1 uveal melanoma and corresponding germline sample. Libraries were prepared using the Kapa HyperPrep kit (Roche, 07962363001). Paired-end libraries (2 x 150 bp) were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 instrument (Illumina).

  Dataset EGAD50000000764

• Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development

  Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development

  Dataset EGAD00001000002

• DAC-2023-07-05-Ritz (DAC-007)

  Full description of the dataset and all necessary information on metadata may be found under (https://zenodo.org/records/11237107): DAC-2023-07-05-Ritz (DAC-007), raw data in EGA, metadata in Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/11237107)

  Dataset EGAD50000001147

• Analysis of Multiparametric MR imaging and tumor tissue sampling to identify response and acquired resistance to HIF-2 inhibition in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma enrolled in a phase 1, multiple-dose, dose-escalation trial of PT2385, a HIF-2alpha inhibitor

  Study EGAS00001003506

• RNA-Seq soft tissue sarcoma tumoroid biobank

  Dataset EGAD00001008467

• Triple-negative breast cancer sequencing data

  Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomic sequencing data associated with manuscript 'Ectopic NMDAR expression in cancer unmasks germline-encoded autoimmunity'

  Dataset EGAD50000002266

• RNA sequencing of AML with 3q26 rearrangements

  RNA sequencing of 44 AML cases with diverse 3q26 rearrangements. This dataset is complementary to EGAD00001000726 (which only contains t(3;3)/inv(3)) and to EGAD00001006123.

  Dataset EGAD00001015629

• HV31 - 10x linked-read sequencing

  10x linked-read sequencing data for individual HV31 generated using DNA from CD14+ monocytes, to a sequencing depth of ~40×. Sequencing was performed at Bart’s and the London Genome Centre on the Illumina HiSeq platform.

  Dataset EGAD00001007046

• 10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for SA1035X8XB03425

  10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA1035 passage 8

  Dataset EGAD00001009148

• 10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for SA1184SA

  10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for High grade serous ovarian carcinoma patient SA1184

  Dataset EGAD00001009145

• 10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for OV2295

  10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for High grade serous ovarian carcinoma cell line OV2295

  Dataset EGAD00001009143

• Single Cell Genome Sequence for DLP+ library A96141A

  Single Cell Genome Sequence for triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA604 passage 8 on DLP+ library A96141A

  Dataset EGAD00001009777

• Genome-wide array data Tunisia and Morocco

  This dataset contains genome-wide array data from Tunisian and Moroccan individuals. Tunisian individuals were sampled in the city of Tunis (n = 64), and Moroccan individuals in different urban areas in the country (n = 45).

  Dataset EGAD00001009071

• 10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for SA604X8XB02164

  10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA604 passage 8

  Dataset EGAD00001009118

• The University of Hong Kong Gastric Cancer XClone Study Single Cell CNV Data

  Single cell encapsulation and DNA libraries were prepared by Chromium™ Single Cell DNA Reagent Kits and Chromium™ Single Cell C and D Chip Kits.

  Dataset EGAD00001015383

• 10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for SA1035X4XB02879

  10x Genomics Single Cell Gene Expression for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA1035 passage 4

  Dataset EGAD00001009147

• Multiome

  This dataset contains the raw sequencing data (Runs) from all of the 10x Genomics single-cell Multiome Experiments

  Dataset EGAD00001009824

• 200PT : SNV vcf files

  200PT : SNV vcf files. SNV calls generated using SomaticSniper and PhyloWGS, from the CPCGene 200PT Subclonality study

  Dataset EGAD00001004072

• Sequencing data for ICGC Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma tissue samples - TLR_pathway_study

  upcoming publication

  Dataset EGAD00001001960

• CNA vcf files for CPCG Subclonal Heterogeneity

  CNA calls generated using the SomaticSniper-Battenberg-PhyloWGS from the CPC-GENE Subclonal Heterogeneity study

  Dataset EGAD00001004405

• SNV vcf files for CPCG Subclonal Heterogeneity

  SNV calls generated using the MuTect-TITAN-PhyloWGS from the CPC-GENE Subclonal Heterogeneity study

  Dataset EGAD00001004401

• 4C-seq data

  4C-seq data was generated for regions of interest to confirm enhancer-gene promoter interactions

  Dataset EGAD00001001847

• WGS and RNA-Seq data from a GBM patient PT-AR5365

  WGS and RNA-Seq data from a GBM patient PT-AR5365

  Dataset EGAD00001004227

• CNA vcf files for CPCG Subclonal Heterogeneity

  CNA calls generated using the MuTect-TITAN-PhyloWGS from the CPC-GENE Subclonal Heterogeneity study

  Dataset EGAD00001004404

• Triple Negative BC RNA Sequencing

  We propose to definitively characterise the somatic genetics of breast cancer through generation of comprehensive catalogues of somatic mutations in breast cancer cases by high coverage genome sequencing coupled with integrated transcriptomic and methylation analyses.

  Dataset EGAD00001001339

• SNV vcf files for CPCG Subclonal Heterogeneity

  SNV calls generated using the SomaticSniper-Battenberg-PhyloWGS from the CPC-GENE Subclonal Heterogeneity study

  Dataset EGAD00001004402

• CNA vcf files for CPCG Subclonal Heterogeneity

  CNA calls generated using the MuTect-Battenberg-PhyloWGS from the CPC-GENE Subclonal Heterogeneity study

  Dataset EGAD00001004403

• WGS and RNA-Seq data from a GBM patient PT-RW9277

  WGS and RNA-Seq data from a GBM patient PT-RW9277

  Dataset EGAD00001004259

• SNV vcf files for CPCG Subclonal Heterogeneity

  SNV calls generated using the MuTect-Battenberg-PhyloWGS from the CPC-GENE Subclonal Heterogeneity study

  Dataset EGAD00001004400

• ICGC Benchmark 1 (CLL)

  Raw fastq files from WGS sequencing of CLL and matching blood normal for the ICGC Techval Benchmark1 study. Sequence data was provided to multiple centers for independent analysis and comparison.

  Dataset EGAD00001001858

• Single-cell RNA-Seq (Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3' Reagent Kits v3.1 from 10X Genomics )

  Human data for transcriptome (scRNA-Seq) in CD34+ B cell precursors.

  Dataset EGAD00001010907

• LBC1921 bam files

  297 members of the LBC1921 were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X platform. This dataset contains the bam files.

  Dataset EGAD00001011667

• RNA-seq dataset of CD34+ HSPCs from LRMDS patients

  To profile transcriptional alterations of HSPCs in LR-MDS patients, 7AAD−CD45+Lin-CD235a−CD34+ cells were isolated from healthy donors and LR-MDS patients for RNA sequencing.

  Dataset EGAD00001015771

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a diffuse aarge B-cell lymphoma (relapse) tumor patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (relapse) patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Pediatric Personalized Onco-Genomics study

  Dataset EGAD00001015308

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a relapsed blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm tumor patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a relapsed blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Pediatric Personalized Onco-Genomics study

  Dataset EGAD00001015312

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor tumor patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a metastatic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Pediatric Personalized Onco-Genomics study

  Dataset EGAD00001015322

• Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a CNS non-germinoma germ cell tumour tumor patient

  Genome and transcriptome sequence data from a CNS non-germinoma germ cell tumour patient, generated as part of the BC Cancer Agency's Pediatric Personalized Onco-Genomics study

  Dataset EGAD00001015327

• WES raw data for study "Molecular and functional profiling of plasmablastic lymphoma"

  1 cell line and 123 patient samples including 38 normal (22 paired normal and 16 unpaired), 85 tumor-initial, FASTQ file types, Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V6 Kit

  Dataset EGAD00001006400

• Genomic Diagnosis and Individualized Therapy of Highly Penetrant Genetic Diabetes

  The most common and well-known causes of diabetes are type 1 and type 2 diabetes; however, there are many other etiologies of diabetes. At least 1-2% of diabetes cases result from high penetrance single gene defects, most commonly in a gene encoding either a transcription factor involved in beta cell development and function or the enzyme glucokinase (GCK). Others have mutations in transcription factors necessary for beta cell development and function. This subset of monogenic diabetes cases is autosomal dominant and is known as "Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young" (MODY). Patients with type 1 diabetes are insulin dependent, meaning they lack insulin production and therefore require multiple daily injections of insulin, as well as multiple times a day blood glucose monitoring. This can be quite burdensome. Type 2 diabetes is predominantly an insulin resistance problem and can often be managed with pills initially, but there are many who also require insulin either at diagnosis or later on in their disease course. Usually, monogenic diabetes is misdiagnosed as type 1 or type 2 diabetes and thus treated suboptimally. Those with monogenic diabetes, due to a defect in a gene encoding a transcription factor, respond extremely well to a class of oral diabetes medications called sulfonylureas. Those with GCK-MODY often have a mild, stable, fasting, nonprogressive hyperglycemia for which pharmacological treatment is often not necessary. It is important to accurately diagnose our patients with the correct etiology to their diabetes for a multitude of reasons. Accurately diagnosing a patient with MODY, for example, can predict their clinical course and we can tailor treatment accordingly. If diagnosed with a transcription factor MODY, we can try switching the patient from insulin to an oral sulfonylurea, and if diagnosed with a GCK-MODY, we can consider discontinuing pharmacological treatment altogether. With specific tailoring of treatment, we would hope to improve quality of life by discontinuing perhaps multiple daily injections of insulin and glucose checking as these may not be necessary. In addition, we would hope to improve glycemic control with an eventual decreased cost to society by decreasing the complication rate of diabetes, resulting in less specialty referrals, lab tests, supplies and procedures. Further, given MODY is an autosomal dominant condition with a 50% chance of inheritance to first-degree family members, we could offer testing to asymptomatic family members which could lead to prevention and/or early diagnosis and treatment. Overall, testing for monogenic diabetes is underutilized clinically. Testing is being done in the U.K., but in the U.S. we are lagging behind. This is most predominantly due to lack of knowledge and concern over cost. In addition, it is difficult to differentiate the relatively small number of monogenic diabetes cases from the larger number with type 1 and type 2 diabetes as each of these etiologies have overlapping characteristics. In fact, many patients with monogenic diabetes are being misdiagnosed with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. There are recommendations set forth by different societies on who to consider screening for monogenic diabetes. However, these recommendations are difficult to employ clinically as they are general recommendations, there is no specific algorithm, and they are based on varying levels of evidence. The purpose of this study is to implement a personalized diabetes medicine program to enhance the identification of individuals and families affected by highly penetrant diabetes gene mutations through a combination of systematic screening and genetic testing at the University of Maryland Center for Diabetes and Endocrinology, the Baltimore VA Medical Center and additional partner centers at Geisinger Health System and Bay West Endocrinology Associates, and other UM outpatient clinics. Our hope is to develop an approach that can be eventually implemented across the United States so that we can more often uncover the correct etiology to diabetes, tailor treatment accordingly, and test asymptomatic family members.

  Study phs001771

• EGAD00000000003

  WTCCC1 project Bipolar Disorder (BD) samples

  Dataset EGAD00000000003

• Cancer Genome Scanning in Plasma: Detection of Tumor-Associated Copy Number Aberrations, Single-Nucleotide Variants, and Tumoral Heterogeneity by Massively Parallel Sequencing

  Cancer Genome Scanning in Plasma: Detection of Tumor-Associated Copy Number Aberrations, Single-Nucleotide Variants, and Tumoral Heterogeneity by Massively Parallel Sequencing

  Dataset EGAD00001000284

• Cancer Genome Scanning in Plasma: Detection of Tumor-Associated Copy Number Aberrations, Single-Nucleotide Variants, and Tumoral Heterogeneity by Massively Parallel Sequencing

  Cancer Genome Scanning in Plasma: Detection of Tumor-Associated Copy Number Aberrations, Single-Nucleotide Variants, and Tumoral Heterogeneity by Massively Parallel Sequencing

  Dataset EGAD00001000290

• Sensitive circulating tumor DNA based residual disease detection in epithelial ovarian cancer

  We analyzed 264 plasma samples collected between June 2016 and September 2021 from 63 epithelial ovarian cancer patients using tumor-guided plasma cell-free DNA analysis to detect residual disease after treatment.

  Dataset EGAD50000000360

• Refractory Classic Hodgkins Lymphoma (cHL) sWGS

  Associated with the study: Blood-based Monitoring of Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Predict Responses to Anti-PD-1 Treatment. 26 ctDNA Samples from 4 patients followed longitudinally. sWGS performed for copy number aberration (CNA) analysis.

  Dataset EGAD50000001163

• The natural history of clonal haematopoiesis: colony WGS

  Whole-genome sequencing of 288 single-cell-derived blood colonies from 3 elderly individuals with clonal haematopoiesis.

  Dataset EGAD00001007684

• HV31 - PacBio continuous long read (CLR) sequencing

  PacBio continuous long read (CLR) sequencing data for individual HV31 generated on PacBio Sequel II instrument, using DNA from CD14+ monocytes, to a sequencing depth of ~35×. Sequencing was performed at the Wellcome Sanger Institute.

  Dataset EGAD00001007047