15028 results for "cancer studies using rna-seq"

in 17.38 milliseconds.

• Submitter Portal API

  Submitter Portal API The metadata submission process can be difficult and time-consuming. For this reason, the EGA has developed the Submitter Portal, a tool that was created to offer a simplified and user-friendly method of registering metadata. Our portal provides features that are intended to make the input of metadata easier, ensuring that your data is registered correctly and effectively. Our page is divided into logical sections and includes a helpful video instruction to further assist you as you complete the submission process. With the Submitter Portal, you can rest assured that the submission of your data is in good hands. For those that want a more flexible and automated approach, we also provide a programmatic approach using the Submitter Portal AP in addition to the user interface of the Submitter Portal. With the help of our API, you can quickly include the submission of metadata into your own workflow for a more effective and individualised experience. Previous steps Create your EGA account To submit data you first need to create your EGA user. Then, once your account has been verified, you will have to request a submitter role and sign the EGA Data Processing Agreement (DPA). When the DPA is signed, you must send it to EGA Helpdesk for further validation. Please, note that if you already have an EGA account, or you have an ega-box (submission account), you can skip this step.  Upload your files Please note that all your files must be encrypted using the Crypt4GH tool before upload them.As soon as you are assigned with a submitter role, you will be able to connect to the EGA inbox and upload your files. Understand the EGA metadata schema It's crucial to comprehend the EGA metadata schema, a set of rules that specify how data is organised, described, and shared inside the EGA, in order to get the most out of this resource. Learn all about EGA metadata schema! Register your DAC and policy There are two objects in the EGA metadata schema that are registered in a separate portal. All DACs and policy objects are registered using the DAC Portal, a tool developed by EGA to help data controllers manage their data stored at the EGA. You can find the relevant information in the DAC Portal Guide. Programmatic submission All the calls to the API need to be Authenticated. We use the OpenID Connect protocol. API Usage Flow: Click here to check the API usage flow schema Obtain Access and Refresh Token: The first step to using the API is to obtain an access and refresh token. These tokens are required for authentication and authorisation of API requests. To obtain these tokens, you need to log in using your EGA credentials. Example: curl "https://idp.ega-archive.org/realms/EGA/protocol/openid-connect/token" \ -d "grant_type=password" \ -d "client_id=sp-api" \ -d "username=your-username" \ --data-urlencode "password=your-password" Use Access Token in API Calls: Once you have obtained the access token, you must use it in all the calls to the API. The access token is valid for a limited time period. When it expires, you will need to use the refresh token to obtain a new access token. Create Submission Object: After authentication, you can start creating a submission object. This object will be used to store all the metadata objects and files related to the submission. Example: curl "https://submission.ega-archive.org/api/submissions" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer your-access-token" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{ \"title\":\"My submission title\", \"description\":\"My submission description\" }" Create EGA Metadata Objects: Within the submission object, you can create other metadata objects required for the submission. These objects may include information about the submitter, study, sample, experiment, and run. Example of study creation: curl "https://submission.ega-archive.org/api/submissions/{submisison-id}/studies" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer your-access-token" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{ \"title\":\"My study title\", \"description\":\"My study description\", \"study_type\":\"Metagenomics\" }" If you would like to reuse already registered objects in new submissions, bear in mind that they must have an accession which you must use to reference them. You cannot reuse objects that have not been finalised and accepted yet.For example, when creating a new run which is reusing a previously submitted experiment, instead of using experiment_provisional_id, you must use experiment_accession_id. Enums There are some fields that only accept specific values, i.e. study_type. The API provides several enumerations to list these values. You can list all the enumerations, or a specific one, for example, study_types. Obtain IDs of files You can list the files available in your inbox and filter by a prefix by adding the prefix param, i.e. &prefix=/my_folder/abc Example: curl "https://submission.ega-archive.org/api/files?status=inbox&prefix=/my_folder/abc" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer your-access-token" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" To improve performance and manageability, we have limited the number of files that the Submitter Portal API can return in a response. If a given call exceeds this limit, user will be asked to narrow down the search by using the query parameters already available in this endpoint. Finalise Submission: Once all the metadata objects are created and linked to the submission, you can finalise the submission. Finalising the submission sends it to the Helpdesk team for review. Please, note that all files linked to the submission must be ingested, and all objects created in a submission must be linked before you can finalise the submission. API Reference: For a full API reference, please check our specification documentation.

  Documentation submission/metadata/submission/sequencing-phenotype/submitter-portal-api

• TRACERx NSCLC, multiregion sequencing of the first 100 tumors

  BACKGROUND TRACERx (TRAcking Cancer Evolution through therapy (Rx)) is a prospective cohort study designed to investigate intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) in relation to clinical outcome, and to determine the clonal nature of driver events and evolutionary processes in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Multiregion high-depth whole-exome sequencing (M-seq) was performed on 100 early stage NSCLC tumors resected prior to systemic therapy. A total of 327 tumor regions were sequenced and analyzed to define evolutionary histories, obtain a census of clonal and subclonal events, and assess the relationship between ITH and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Widespread ITH was observed for both somatic copy number alterations (median 48% [0.03-88%]) and mutations (median 30% [0.5-93%]). Driver mutations in EGFR, MET, BRAF and TP53 were almost always clonal. However, heterogeneous driver alterations occurring later in evolution were found in over 75% of tumors and were common in PIK3CA, NF1 and genes involved in chromatin modification and DNA response and repair. Genome doubling and ongoing dynamic chromosomal instability (CIN), illustrated by mirrored subclonal allelic imbalance, were identified as causes of ITH resulting in parallel evolution of driver copy number events, including amplifications of CDK4, FOXA1, and BCL11A. Elevated copy number heterogeneity was associated with shorter RFS (HR=4.9, P=0.00044), which remained significant in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS ITH mediated through CIN, rather than point mutational heterogeneity, was associated with increased risk of relapse, supporting its value as a prognostic predictor, and the need to target this high-risk phenotype.

  Dataset EGAD00001003206

• RNA-seq study of longitudinal blood cell samples from children at risk of type 1 diabetes

  The appearance of type 1 diabetes (T1D)-associated autoantibodies is the first and only measurable parameter to predict progression toward T1D in genetically susceptible individuals. However, autoantibodies indicate an active autoimmune reaction, wherein the immune tolerance is already broken. Therefore, there is a clear and urgent need for new biomarkers that predict the onset of the autoimmune reaction preceding auto-antibody positivity or reflect progressive b-cell destruction. Here we report the mRNA sequencing–based analysis of 306 samples including fractionated samples of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as CD4, CD8 cell fractions and unfractionated PBMC samples longitudinally collected from seven children who developed beta-cell autoimmunity (Case subjects) at a young age and matched control subjects.

  Study EGAS00001004071

• RNA-seq data

  RNAseq FASTq files of 181 bulk pre-treatment and 14 post-treatment tumors from GO30140 Ph1b group A and F and 177 bulk pre-treatment tumors of IMbrave150 PhIII

  Dataset EGAD00001008128

• Whole-genome and transcriptome versus panel sequencing in precision oncology: A translational-clinical comparison

  Precision oncology offers new cancer treatment options. While the use of whole-genome (WGS) and transcriptome (TS) sequencing remains often confined to specific clinical programs, molecular analysis with gene panels is more common clinical practice. Methods: Twenty patients with rare or advanced tumors sequenced by WGS/TS within the DKFZ/NCT/DKTK-MASTER program from 2015 to 2020 (MASTER 1) were additionally sequenced with the TSO500 DNA and TST170 RNA Assay by Illumina. Original Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) therapy recommendations (TR) were juxtaposed with TR from NGS panel data analysis (comparison 1). To mitigate temporal differences between the two sequencings, WGS/TS was bioinformatically reanalyzed (MASTER 2), and new TR were again compared (comparison 2). Results: In comparison 1, 47.1% of the MASTER 1’s TR and 62.8% of the panel’s TR were identical, as were 45.9% of the TR of MASTER 2 and 54.9% of the panel in comparison 2. In both MASTER 1 and MASTER 2, 26.5% and 36.1% of TR, respectively, relied on Biomarkers (BM) which were not covered by the panel. Eight of the ten MTB-derived therapy implementations were also supported in the panel, the two remaining ones being based on BM absent from the panel. Conclusions: About half of the TR in WGS/TS and panel sequencing were identical. Around a third of TR issued by WGS/TS were based on BM which are not covered by the panel, leading to therapy implementations. The presented data underscores the clinical value of comprehensive molecular analyses in individuals with advanced cancers.

  Study EGAS50000000431

• WGS data of paediatric TCF3::PBX1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (set2)

  The dataset includes FASTQ and BAM files from diagnostic and matched remission (control) samples of one TCF3::PBX1 ALL patient (ALLT-376). Sequencing library was made using PCR free-based WGS library preparation (PCR-), using NEB Next® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit. Both diagnostic (90x) and remission (30x) samples were sequenced using HiSeq X.

  Dataset EGAD50000001795

• WGS data of pediatric TCF3::PBX1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (set1)

  The dataset includes FASTQ and BAM files from diagnostic and matched remission (control) samples of one TCF3::PBX1 ALL patient (ALLT-335). Sequencing library was made using standard PCR-based WGS library preparation (PCR+), using NEB Next® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit. Both diagnostic (90x) and remission (30x) samples were sequenced using HiSeq X.

  Dataset EGAD50000001796

• Cell-free DNA sequencing using newly developed single-strand DNA library preparation

  We performed whole genome sequencing of cell-free DNA that was collected from human plasma using an improved cfDNA purification protocol and DNA library prepared with newly developped protocol of our own.

  Study JGAS000257

• WGS data of paediatric BCR::ABL1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia

  The dataset includes FASTQ and CRAM files from diagnostic and matched remission (control) samples of one BCR::ABL1 ALL patient (ALLT-399). Sequencing library was made using PCR free-based WGS library preparation (PCR-), using Novogene NGS DNA Library Prep Set Kit (Cat No. PT004). Both diagnostic (90x) and remission (30x) samples were sequenced using NovaSeqX Plus.

  Dataset EGAD50000002185

• WGS data of paediatric B-other B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (set5)

  The dataset includes FASTQ and BAM/CRAM files from diagnostic and matched remission (control) samples of two B-other ALL patients (ALLT-396, ALLK-131). Sequencing library was made using PCR free-based WGS library preparation (PCR-), using Novogene NGS DNA Library Prep Set. Both diagnostic (90x) and remission (30x) samples were sequenced using NovaSeqX Plus.

  Dataset EGAD50000002160

• WGS data of paediatric ETV6::RUNX1 B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (set2)

  The dataset includes FASTQ and CRAM files from second relapse and matched remission (control) samples of one ETV6::RUNX1 ALL patient (ALLK-104). Sequencing libraries were made using using NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit (Cat No. E7645). Both second relapse (90x) and remission (30x) samples were sequenced using Illumina NovaSeq 6000.

  Dataset EGAD50000002286

• A complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) was resolved at the nucleotide level by whole genome long read sequencing using PacBio sequencing platform.

  A complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) involving 7 chromosomes and 11 breakpoints was resolved at the nucleotide level by whole genome long read sequencing using PacBio sequencing platform.

  Study EGAS00001008133

• WGS data of paediatric hyperdiploid B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (set2)

  The dataset includes FASTQ and BAM files from diagnostic and matched remission (control) samples of two hyperdiploid ALL patients (ALLT-315, ALLT-320). Sequencing libraries were made using PCR free-based WGS library preparation (PCR-), using TruSeq DNA PCRfree library preparation kit v1. Both diagnostic (60x) and remission (30x) samples were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq X.

  Dataset EGAD50000002426

• Single cell ATAC sequencing

  Paired-end fastq files of 22 AML and 2 normal bone marrow samples were generated using 10x Genomics single cell ATAC sequencing following manufacturer's protocol (CG000168 User Guide RevB) for chemistry version 1.0 and targeting 10000 nuclei per sample. Libraries were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq4000 using recommended cycling parameters.

  Dataset EGAD00001007675