11958 results for "trusted fc coin sellers Visit Buyfc26coins.com for latest FC 26 coins news..yRIE"

in 20.77 milliseconds.

• Center for Common Disease Genomics [CCDG] - Neuropsychiatric: Epilepsy: Epi25 Consortium

  Epilepsy genetics research is at an exciting stage where it is now feasible, with the power of a large cohort, to understand the more complex genetic components of epilepsy. The driving principle behind the Epi25 Consortium is collaboration and synergy - it is only possible to achieve this type of research by working together. The Epi25 Consortium was formed by the unification of various consortia, including Epi4K, EPIGEN, EuroEPINOMICS, the Epilepsy Phenome/Genome Project, EpiPGX, SANAD, and EpiCURE, and individual epilepsy investigators. The consortium's sample collection is the best resource in the world for this disease, both in terms of numbers of patients and quality of phenotypic information. As part of the NHGRI Centers for Common Disease Genomics (2016-2020), we aggregated a global sample collection from the various repositories for whole genome genotyping and whole exome sequencing (WES) at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA), initiating the largest and most ethnically diverse genetic study of epilepsy to date. The primary epilepsy phenotypes for Epi25 are based on strict standards agreed upon by the epilepsy community. The epilepsy cases contributed by Epi25 sites can be broadly defined as genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), non-acquired focal epilepsy (NAFE), epileptic encephalopathies (EE), and lesional focal epilepsies. More information about eligibility criteria and phenotyping forms for Epi25, as well as the contributing centers, can be found here: epi-25.org The genomic data will be analyzed iteratively to identify genes and variants that explain these types of epilepsy. Summary clinical data compiled in the Epi25 clinical database will allow retrospective phenotypic analyses of groups of subjects with common genomic variant(s).

  Study phs001489

• Germline variants in patients with rare cancers and their implications for precision cancer medicine: experiences from the Multicenter MASTER Trial by the German Cancer Consortium (HIPO_021)

  The era of precision oncology entails an increasing amount of molecular data from tumor sequencing in research and diagnostics. In this setting, germline variant analysis may add clinical benefits for patients and family members. In this study, we evaluated germline variants from genome/exome matched tumor-blood sequencing in 1.485 advanced cancer patients within a prospective observational study carried out by the German Cancer Consortium. Included patients had cancers of rare entities (79.2%) or were under the age of 51 at first diagnosis (76.6%). Ten percent of the patients harbored pathogenic germline variants in 35 tumor predisposition genes with autosomal-dominant inheritance such as BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, RB1, CHEK2, ATM, PALB2, SDHB etc., while 4.6% of the patients were carriers of pathogenic germline variants in 18 genes with autosomal-recessive inheritance of tumor predisposition. Based on pathogenic germline variants, 14% of the patients received genetic counselling recommendations in the molecular tumor board report. Forty five percent of pathogenic germline variants supported a molecular treatment recommendation, which was implemented for 28 patients. Furthermore, we compared our approach and results to previous studies, broadening the insight into pan cancer germline findings but also revealing differences between studies on various levels, such as cohort demographics, tumor entities, gene nominations, variant detection and variant interpretation. Our data support the importance of germline variant interpretation in precision oncology studies for patients and their families, if applicable. However, guidelines for evaluation and reporting of germline variants in the context of genetic tumor profiling need to be established and further research on the relevance of germline mutations as biomarkers for treatment recommendations is needed.

  Study EGAS00001005537

• Evaluation of somatic mutations in urine samples as a non-invasive method for the detection and molecular classification of endometrial cancer

  Purpose: Current diagnostic methods for endometrial cancer lack specificity, leading to many women undergoing invasive procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate somatic mutations in urine to accurately discriminate endometrial cancer patients from controls. Experimental Design: Overall, 72 samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing with molecular identifiers targeting 47 genes. We evaluated urine supernatant samples from women with endometrial cancer (n=19) and age-matched controls (n=20). Cell pellets from urine and plasma samples from seven cases were sequenced; further, we also evaluated paired tumor samples from all cases. Finally, immunohistochemical markers for molecular profiling were evaluated in all tumor samples. Results: Overall, we were able to identify mutations in DNA from urine supernatant samples in 100% of endometrial cancers. In contrast, only one control (5%) showed variants at a variant allele frequency (VAF)≥2% in the urine supernatant samples. The molecular classification obtained by using tumor samples and urine samples showed good agreement. Analyses in paired samples revealed a higher number of mutations and VAFs in urine supernatants than in urine cell pellets and blood samples. Conclusions: Evaluation of somatic mutations using urine samples may offer a user-friendly and reliable tool for endometrial cancer detection and molecular classification. The diagnostic performance for endometrial cancer detection was very high, and cases could be molecularly classified using these noninvasive and self-collected samples. Additional multi-center evaluations using larger sample sizes are needed to validate the results and understand the potential of urine samples for the early detection and prognosis of endometrial cancer.

  Study EGAS00001007396

• Privacy Notice for Helpdesk service

  Privacy Notice for EGA Helpdesk service This Privacy Notice explains what personal data is collected by the specific service you are requesting, for what purposes, how it is processed, and how we keep it secure. Note that this service collects personal data directly provided by the user, and also collects personal data from users that is provided by other organisations. 1. Who controls your personal data and how to contact us? European Genome- Phenome Archive - EGA offers a service for permanent archiving and sharing of all types of personally identifiable genetic and phenotypic data resulting from biomedical research projects, jointly managed by European Molecular Biology Laboratory – European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) and Fundació Centre de Regulació Genòmica - Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG). EMBL-EBI and CRG represent joint Data Controllers’ of processing of your personal data. They and their Data protection officers may be contacted for data protection queries and for exercising your rights under Section 8. You may contact EMBL-EBI, represented by dr. Thomas Keane, by: email at: tk2@ebi.ac.uk or post at EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, CB10 1SD Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK. EMBL’s Data Protection Officer may be contacted by: telephone at +49 6221 387-8590, email at dpo@embl.org , or post at EMBL Heidelberg, Data protection officer, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany. You may contact CRG, whose EGA team is represented by dr. Jordi Rambla de Argila, by: email at jordi.rambla@crg.eu, or post at Fundació Centre de Regulació Genòmica - Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Dr.Aiguader 88, PRBB Building, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. CRG Data protection officer may be contacted by: email at dpo@crg.eu post at Fundació Centre de Regulació Genòmica - Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), C/ Dr. Aiguader, 88, PRBB Building, 08003 Barcelona, Spain. 2. Which is the lawful basis for processing personal data? We process your personal data on the grounds of important public interest. For monitoring your activities on the website, we process your personal data on the grounds of important public interest. Such legal basis is found in Article 5(1)(a) of EMBL Internal Policy No 68 on General Data Protection (hereinafter IP 68), which is equivalent to Article 6 (1)(e) of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (hereinafter GDPR) and upon which personal data are processed for the achievement of the aims laid down in 1973 agreement establishing EMBL, such as the promotion of the cooperation in the fundamental research, in the development of advanced instrumentation and in advanced teaching in molecular biology and dissemination of information. 3. What personal data is collected from users of the service? How do we use this personal data? We collect the following personal data from users of the service: Name Email address Job title Date and time when the support request was sent We will use your personal data for the following purposes: To provide uninterrupted user access to the service To better understand the needs of the users and guide future improvements of the service To create anonymous usage statistics 4. Who will have access to your personal data? The personal data will be disclosed to: Authorised staff in the data controller’s institutions acting on data controller`s behalf and instructions. 5. Will your personal data be transferred to third countries (i.e. countries not part of EU/EEA) and/or international organisations? There are no personal data transfers to third countries or international organizations. 6. How long do we keep your personal data? Any personal data directly obtained from you will be retained as long as the service is live. Such duration serves the purpose of enabling scientific research and ensures legal compliance and facilitates internal and external audits if they arise. By contrast, the log files for the data categories related to anonymous usage statistics (raw web service logs) are processed only for 30 days and thereafter erased. 7. The joint Data Controllers provide these rights regarding your personal data You have the right to: Not be subject to decisions based solely on an automated processing of data (i.e. without human intervention) without you having your views taken into consideration. Request at reasonable intervals and without excessive delay or expense, information about the personal data processed about you. Under your request we will inform you in writing about, for example, the origin of the personal data or the preservation period. Request information to understand data processing activities when the results of these activities are applied to you. It must be clarified that rights under points 4 and 5 are only available whenever you need support whilst using our website. For other processing based on the grounds of important public interest you cannot exercise your rights to object, rectify or erase your personal data according to the Article 13(2)(a)(b) of IP 68 (equivalent to Article 17(3)(b)(d) and Article 21(6) of the GDPR). 8. Supervisory authority If you wish to complain against the processing of your personal data, you may do so by post at: EMBL Heidelberg, Data Protection Committee, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany, or Autoritat Catalana de Protecció de Dades (Catalan Data Protection Authority), C/Rosselló 214, Esc A, 1r 1a, Barcelona 08008, Spain. Published at: February 6, 2019

  Documentation data-protection/privacy-notice/ega-helpdesk

• Incentives and Case Management to Improve Cardiac Care: Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP)

  Data Access NOTE: Please refer to the “Authorized Access” section below for information about how access to the data from this study.Objectives: The HeLP study assessed how early case management, financial incentives contingent on cardiac-rehabilitation attendance, or both impacted adherence to cardiac rehabilitation among patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) who had a cardiac-rehabilitation-qualifying diagnosis. Background:Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. Regular attendance at cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is the number one recommendation for patients who have experienced a recent cardiac event. CR is a secondary prevention outpatient program involving an individually tailored structured exercise program along with counseling and encouragement regarding lifestyle changes to reduce the recurrence of major cardiac events.Despite the benefits of CR attendance, enrollment and adherence to the program are low. This is particularly true of individuals of lower socioeconomic status (SES), who also generally suffer a higher burden from CVD on account of higher-risk cardiac profiles. As these profiles are the result of modifiable behavior targeted by CR (i.e., smoking, obesity, lack of physical activity), methods of increasing CR attendance among this population are necessary.Case management and financial incentives contingent on CR attendance are two potential strategies for addressing this issue. Previous studies have shown how trained case managers can support and assist patients with attending CR and improving their cardiac health, and how financial incentives can promote various types of health-related behavior. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate how these two interventions, individually and in tandem, fared at improving CR adherence among individuals of lower SES specifically. Participants:A total of 314 participants were screened, and 209 were randomized. All consented to have their data shared for research purposes. Design:Eligible patients were approached either while still in the hospital or during initial visits to CR. After obtaining informed consent, clinical and demographic characteristics (i.e., age, sex, education, race and ethnicity, smoking status, and CR-qualifying diagnosis) and depressive symptoms were collected. Participants then were randomized 2:3:3:3 to usual care (UC), case management starting in hospital (CM), financial incentives for attending CR (FI), or financial incentives plus case management (FICM). For all participants regardless of condition, an appropriate referral for CR was confirmed after randomization. Over the course of the study participants completed three assessments – one at intake, one after four months, and one after one year. Clinical (i.e., cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and cardiac-related quality of life) and sociocognitive (i.e., Beck Depression Inventory, Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function) measures were obtained at each assessment. Participants randomized to the UC condition were contacted weekly by study staff for adverse event checks, but received no additional intervention. Participants randomized to the CM condition were immediately assigned a case manager. Case managers met with their participants, usually within 24 hours of consent while they were still in the hospital, to introduce themselves during an initial check-in. Within the first week of consent they completed a longer, more thorough initial needs assessment with their participant and established behavioral goals. For the next 16 weeks, case managers met with their participants at least once a week, typically over the phone, to discuss progress on these goals and address any problems or barriers that had arisen. Case managers also were available via phone outside of these regular meetings during normal working hours and Saturday mornings. Participants randomized to the FI condition could earn money for completing an initial CR orientation and attending CR sessions. Twenty dollars could be earned for completing the CR orientation session. CR attendance was reinforced on an escalating schedule starting at $10. Payments increased by $2 for each successive session attended, and capped out at a maximum of $40 per session. Unexcused absences resulted in the incentives for that session not being earned, and the potential earnings for the next scheduled session being reset to $10. Successful participation of two consecutive sessions following the reset resulted in the incentives being returned to the amount prior to the reset. In total, participants could earn $1220 for attending the initial orientation and all 36 sessions of CR. The primary outcome of interest was the percentage of participants who completed at least 30 sessions of CR. Secondary outcomes included the number of sessions completed, cardiorespiratory fitness (peak VO2 and estimated metabolic equivalents (METs)), body composition (waist circumference and BMI), depression scores, and both general and cardiac-related qualify of life. Conclusions:The two interventions involving financial incentives (i.e., financial incentives alone and financial incentives plus case management) significantly improved CR adherence compared to usual care. Subsequent analyses revealed that the combination of financial incentives and case management led to greater improvements in CR attendance than financial incentives alone.

  Study phs003737

• Exploiting evolutionary steering in cancer therapy

  This dataset contains 9 bam files of exome sequencing for an experiment of evolved resistance. Here a barcoded cell line (HCC827 - POT) has been treated under high concentrations of gefitinib (GEF) and trametinib (TRM) until resistance has evolved, as well as under control conditions (DMSO). The dataset contains exome sequencing of confluent cells for three replicates for each anti-cancer drug as well as two replicates of growth under DMSO conditions. The original barcoded cell line (POT) was also exome sequenced and is included in the cohort. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq platform.

  Dataset EGAD00001005782

• Genomic and Transcriptomic sequencing of neuroblastoma cell lines

  Genomic and Transcriptomic sequencing of neuroblastoma HSR and ecDNA cell lines. Data represents five 96-well plates that were processed with G&T sequencing, resulting in genomic and transcriptomic data from the same single cells. Dataset contains 95 bam files containing the DNA sequencing data and 95 bam files containing the RNA sequencing data of CHP212 cells, 380 bam files (190 DNA and 190 RNA) for TR14 cells, 188 bam files (94 DNA and 94 RNA) for Kelly cells and 192 bam files (96 DNA and 96 RNA) for IMR5/75 cells.

  Dataset EGAD50000000729

• Genetically unique biospecimens derived from individuals with or without Type 1 Diabetes

  In this dataset, samples correspond to pools of genetically unique biospecimens derived from individuals with or without Type 1 Diabetes. Each sample alias contains all the DNA test numbers for that pool. Each experiment corresponds to scmxGEX (multiome RNA gene expression), scmxATAC (multiome ATAC sequencing), scRNA (single cell RNA sequencing), scATAC (single cell ATAC sequencing) for each pool. Runs link the appropriate fastq files to each experiment. Deconvolution using genetic information is required for single sample-based testing.

  Dataset EGAD50000001257

• Development of actionable molecular targets and/or biomarkers for prognostication and patient stratification in gynecological cancer based on whole-exome sequencing and epigenomic analysis

  We collected 92 endometrial hyperplasia lesions (48 non-atypical from 30 cases and 44 atypical from 24 cases) and matched normal tissues/whole blood. The purpose of this study is to develop actionable molecular targets and/or biomarkers for prognostication and patient stratification.

  Study JGAS000642

• Emirati Haploid Single-Sample-Assemblies (30 Individuals, 60 Assemblies)

  This dataset provides 27 phased diploid genome assemblies for Emirati trios, delivered in FASTA format. Assemblies were built with hifiasm (trio mode) from PacBio HiFi reads at ≥25× coverage for each parent and offspring, then scaffolded with NTLink and reference-guided merging using RagTag against CHM13v2. As part of the same program, a complementary set of single-sample diploid assemblies for 30 individuals (yielding 60 haplotypes) is being generated from deep PacBio HiFi data to expand a population-matched pangenome reference. Together, these resources capture Emirati genomic diversity and support downstream variant discovery and annotation.

  Dataset EGAD50000001753

• Comparison of fresh and slow-frozen cancer samples for different applications

  Surplus tissues from multiple solid human cancers directly slow-frozen after resection can subsequently be used for different types of methods including the establishment of 2D, 3D, and ex vivo cultures as well as single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) with similar results when compared to freshly analyzed material.

  Study EGAS00001005891

• Single-cell RNA-seq data from metastatic ovarian cancer for quality control study

  Quality control is a crucial preliminary step in any single-cell RNAseq experiment, where hard thresholds are commonly used. In order to develop a methodology for a more precise cell filtering in the early steps of a scRNAseq data analysis, we collected tissue samples before chemotherapy from 4 patients.

  Study EGAS00001005066

• Oxford Nanopore RNA sequencing for HLA typing

  A targeted RNA-based method for typing of 12 classical HLA genes using Oxford Nanopore sequencing. In the method, were enriched HLA genes from cDNA of 50 individuals using gene-specific reverse primers. The library molecules were then barcoded, pooled into 2 separate gene pools, and sequenced on MinION R9.4 SpotON flow cells.

  Study EGAS00001004918

• MicroRNA profiling by next-generation sequencing for colorectal cancer screening

  The study was conducted as the marker discovery phase to identify potential microRNA (miRNA) candidates for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Genome-wide profiling with next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using plasma samples from 20 newly diagnosed CRC cases and 20 controls free of colorectal neoplasms matched by age and sex.

  Study EGAS00001005030

• RNA sequencing data for Molecular Characterization of ETMRs

  The dataset contains two samples from one patient. As a representative FFPE tissue sample, ET174 was histologically iden- tified, targeted and microdissected with a puncher for nucleic acid extraction. RNA was extracted using the automated Maxwell system with the Maxwell 16 LEV RNA FFPE Kit (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To evaluate FFPE RNA quality, we used the percentage of RNA fragments >200 nt fragment determination value (DV200). Only RNA samples with DV200 > 70% were included for sequencing on a NextSeq 500 (Illumina). Eight lanes have been sequenced resulting in 16 Fastq files (paired end).

  Dataset EGAD00001006209

• scRNA-seq using 10X Genomics platform

  Matrices of counts from single-cell RNA-seq data for 15 samples from patients with ovarian cancer, 5 samples for each of the 3 tumor immune phenotypes (Infiltrated, Excluded and Desert). Dissociated cells from each tumor sample have been sorted to isolate live cells from the 3 compartments: tumor, immune and stromal. Each of the compartments has been analyzed separately by scRNAseq, excluding some desert tumors for which cells from the stromal and immune compartments have been pooled. Sequencing was performed using 10X Genomics Chromium Single Cell platform (v2 Chemistry).

  Dataset EGAD00001006974

• cfMeDIP data for 72 VPC samples for validation

  We analyzed the cell free DNA methylomes using 72 plasma samples from patients with mCRPC prostate cancer in the VPC project for validation. Methylation was profiled using the methylated DNA immunoprecipitation coupled to next generation sequencing (MeDIP) technology. Files from multiple lanes exists per sample.

  Dataset EGAD00001008737

• Sequencing data for oesophageal and related samples - Ogden et al (WGS, RNA)

  Data supporting: "Widespread reorganisation of the regulatory chromatin landscape facilitates resistance to inhibition of oncogenic ERBB2 signalling" Ogden et al. WGS for tumour and normal samples. RNAseq for tumour samples.

  Dataset EGAD00001007496

• Exome sequencing of a cohort of Rett syndromelike patients (2017-08-16)

  The aim of the project is the definition of the molecular defect in a cohort of Rett-like patients negative for mutations in known disease genes. To this aim, a number of unrelated trios (patients plus parents) will be analysed by exome sequencing. This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/ This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2017-08-16.

  Dataset EGAD00001003564

• Molecular and phenotypic data for patients enrolled in the IMmotion150 trial

  Tumor transcriptome and whole exome sequencing data (matched tumor/normal for somatic mutation calling) along with key phenotypic information are provided for patients enrolled in the phase 2 IMmotion150 trial, assessing efficacy of atezolizumab monotherapy or combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus standard of care (sunitinib) in 1L renal cell carcinoma. This data set accompanies the respective Nature Medicine publication (PMID: 29867230).

  Dataset EGAD00001004183

• PKD1 capture-by-hybridization resequencing for genetic diagnostics of polycystic kidney disease

  We established and validated a sequence capture based NGS testing approach for PKD1. The presence of six PKD1 pseudogenes and tremendous allelic heterogeneity make molecular genetic testing of PKD1 variants challenging. In the publication accompaying this dataset (An efficient and comprehensive strategy for genetic diagnostics of polycystic kidney disease, Eisenberger et.al., PLoS one), we demonstrate that the applied standard mapping algorithm specifically aligns reads to the PKD1 locus and overcomes the complication of unspecific capture of pseudogenes. This dataset contains the raw PKD1 reads of all patients from the publication.

  Dataset EGAD00001001091

• Transcriptome and Exome from longitudinal samples of human glioblastoma

  We obtained paired longitudinal specimens from a total of 38 glioblastoma (GBM) patients (34 primary and 4 secondary GBM patients). Treatment-naive initial tumors were available for 35 cases; for the other 3 cases, we used the first available recurrent tumors in lieu of initial tumors. Tumor specimens were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (27 of 38 cases, with the matched normal/blood for 22 of the 27 cases) and transcriptome sequencing (30 of 38 cases).

  Dataset EGAD00001001424

• BLUEPRINT September 2016, ChIPmentation for effector memory CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell, terminally differentiated from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38

  ChIPmentation data for 1 sample(s) for effector memory CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell, terminally differentiated from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38. 5 run(s), 3 experiment(s), 3 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT (September 2016).

  Dataset EGAD00001002943

• BLUEPRINT September 2016, ChIP-Seq for class switched memory B cell from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38

  ChIP-Seq data for 1 sample(s) for class switched memory B cell from venous blood, on Genome GRCh38. 1 run(s), 1 experiment(s), 1 alignment(s). Part of BLUEPRINT (September 2016).Analysis documentation available at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/blueprint/releases/20140811/homo_sapiens/README_chipseq_analysis_ebi_20140811

  Dataset EGAD00001002951

• Transcriptomics of human olfactory mucosa

  The olfactory gene repertoire is largely species-specific, shaped by the nature and necessity of chemosensory information for survival in each species' niche. We are intrigued by this interspecific variation and started to investigate the olfactory transcriptome in primates for evidence of selection at the level of receptor gene choice. Having collected this data from two primates, we now wish to extend the analysis to humans. This data is part of a pre-publication release. For information on the proper use of pre-publication data shared by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (including details of any publication moratoria), please see http://www.sanger.ac.uk/datasharing/

  Dataset EGAD00001003213