7147 results for "canc*"

in 32.57 milliseconds.

• Development of New Diagnostics, Therapeutics, and Prevention Methods for Personalized Medicine Based on Comprehensive Cancer-Related Gene Exome Analysis and Information Analysis Using Cancer Specimens Stored in TMDU Biobank.

  Biobanked tumor samples are a valuable resource in real-world solid tumor research. Panel-based genomic profiling enables the identification of clinically significant alterations that inform personalized diagnostic and treatment decisions. This study aimed to characterize the genomic landscape of solid tumors collected through the TMDU Biobank by summarizing mutational, copy number, and gene fusion alterations in a large and diverse patient cohort. This dataset contains summary-level genomic information from 1,996 tumor samples analyzed by ACT Genomics and ACT med using the ACTOnco Comprehensive 440-Gene Cancer Panel. Data provided includes (1) gene-level mutation counts, (2) a summary of copy number alterations, and (3) a summary of detected fusion events. Clinical attributes such as ICD-10 codes, age group, sex, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were included at the aggregate level. Summary statistics were generated from three source tables (gene, sample, and copy number data) using standardized processing rules. Due to contractual and ethical considerations, individual-level mutation locations and raw sequence data are not included; only summary-level information is provided. This dataset will support future research in tumor-type-specific genomic patterns, molecular characterization of solid malignancies, and precision oncology.

  Study JGAS000863

• IMMUcan SCCHN1 cohort

  The goal of IMMUcan is to understand how the immune system interacts with tumors and how therapeutic interventions influence this interaction. This cohort includes patients with confirmed locally recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who receive first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or ICI combined with chemotherapy. Comprehensive profiling data are integrated with longitudinally collected clinical information. Cellular profiling of the same tumor samples was performed using multiplex immunofluorescence imaging, imaging mass cytometry, and H&E staining.

  Study EGAS50000001533

• DAC for lymphoma IFZ Essen

  This DAC is set in place to handle acess to data on lymphomas and immune cells submitted by scientists from the Institute of Cell Biology (Cancer Research) at the University of Duisburg-Essen in Essen, Germany.

  Dac EGAC50000000521

• IMMUcan Lung NSCLC2 cohort

  The goal of IMMUcan is to understand how the immune system interacts with tumors and how therapeutic interventions influence this interaction. This cohort includes patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had surgical resection. This is a subcohort of the EORTC SPECTAlung study. Comprehensive profiling data are integrated with longitudinally collected clinical information. Cellular profiling of the same tumor samples was performed using multiplex immunofluorescence imaging, imaging mass cytometry, and H&E staining.

  Study EGAS50000001558

• Transcriptomics for LUNG-NSCLC2 cohort

  The goal of IMMUcan is to understand how the immune system interacts with tumors and how therapeutic interventions influence this interaction. This cohort includes patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had surgical resection. This is a subcohort of the EORTC SPECTAlung study. This dataset contains transcriptomics data processed with the STAR pipeline. Two sequencing kits were employed: Roche KAPA for high-quality RNA samples and Takara SMART-Seq Stranded for samples with limited RNA quantities.

  Dataset EGAD50000002236

• Transcriptomic insights into IPMN-associated PDAC progression

  This study investigates the transcriptomic heterogeneity and evolutionary progression of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and their associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Multi-region tumour sampling was performed to characterise spatial variation in gene expression and to identify transcriptional changes associated with malignant transformation. The project aims to improve understanding of tumour evolution in pancreatic cancer and to identify molecular pathways involved in IPMN-to-PDAC progression.

  Study EGAS50000001540

• Tumor Normal WES dataset

  This dataset contains tumor-normal WES data in BAM files aqcuired from patients with renal cancer tumors and treated with Sunitinib

  Dataset EGAD50000001174

• Single cell RNA and ATAC sequencing data from GBM patients

  Glioblastoma cells infiltrate and incorporate into the normal brain parenchyma. We conduct unbiased multimodal single-cell and spatial sequencing to capture GBM cells and the surrounding tumor microenvironment using a regional sampling strategy. For each patient, we profile the peritumoral region, tumor edge, and tumor core, providing a comprehensive characterization of the transcriptional and epigenetic landscape of GBM spatial heterogeneity, with a specific focus on infiltrative cells.

  Study EGAS50000000547

• Bulk RNASeq of metastatic colorectal cancer organoids with ATOH1 knockout

  Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on mCRC organoids subjected to cetuximab treatment, comparing ATOH1 knockout and control conditions. The dataset is intended to elucidate the contribution of ATOH1-regulated secretory cell population to cetuximab persistence mechanisms.

  Study EGAS50000001421

• Bulk RNASeq of metastatic colorectal cancer organoids treated with crenigacestat alone or in combination with cetuximab

  Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on mCRC organoids cultured under untreated conditions or treated with crenigacestat alone or in combination with cetuximab. This dataset was generated to investigate the transcriptional changes associated with combination therapy and to compare these profiles with the adaptive responses observed following cetuximab monotherapy in the corresponding ATOH1 wild-type and knockout organoid models.

  Study EGAS50000001422

• Bulk RNASeq of metastatic colorectal cancer organoids with ATOH1 knockout

  Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on mCRC organoids subjected to cetuximab treatment, comparing ATOH1 knockout and control conditions. The dataset is intended to elucidate the contribution of ATOH1-regulated secretory cell population to cetuximab persistence mechanisms.

  Dataset EGAD50000002060

• Bulk RNASeq of metastatic colorectal cancer organoids treated with crenigacestat alone or in combination with cetuximab

  Bulk RNA sequencing was performed on mCRC organoids cultured under untreated conditions or treated with crenigacestat alone or in combination with cetuximab. This dataset was generated to investigate the transcriptional changes associated with combination therapy and to compare these profiles with the adaptive responses observed following cetuximab monotherapy in the corresponding ATOH1 wild-type and knockout organoid models.

  Dataset EGAD50000002061

• A clinically and genomically annotated Early onset colorectal cancer and late onset colorectal cancer

  This study aimed to identify genomic characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) compared to late-onset cases. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on EOCRC and late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) tissues and blood samples to analyze their genomic profiles.

  Study EGAS50000000544

• Long-read whole genome sequencing of gastric cancer

  Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant health challenge globally, with a particularly high incidence in Asia, including Singapore. Understanding the genomic landscape of normal gastric and the different GC subtypes along with its precursor lesions such as intestinal metaplasia (IM) as well as GC metastatic sites is crucial for advancing diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics. Long-read sequencing technologies offer an opportunity to delve deeper into the genomic and epigenetic alterations underlying these conditions and to complement existing short-read omics data. By integrating these data with previously generated in-house multi-omics data (such as RNA sequencing and whole exome sequencing), we hope to better elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying GC initiation and progression.

  Study EGAS50000001607

• PacBio HiFi whole-genome sequencing of two microsatellite instability (MSI) gastric cancer

  We generated long-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data using PacBio HiFi from two human gastric cancer cell lines exhibiting microsatellite instability (MSI). The dataset contains aligned bam (hg38) files.

  Dataset EGAD50000002300

• Genomic evolution of pancreatic cancer at single-cell resolution

  This project assesses genomic evolution of pancreatic cancer using the Mission Bio Tapestri platform and Whole Exome Sequencing. The Mission Bio Tapestri platform is a single-cell DNA sequencing platform using a targeted gene panel to assess SNV/CNV. Several samples, including primary and metastatic tissue, were used to investigate changes at single-cell resolution.

  Study EGAS50000001351

• RNA sequencing of untreated head and neck cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and matched patient tumor tissue.

  RNA sequencing was performed on untreated patient tumor tissue and matched patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this analysis was to characterize the transcriptional landscape of the tumors in the in vivo setting.

  Study EGAS50000001595

• RNA sequencing of untreated head and neck cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and matched patient tumor tissue.

  RNA sequencing was performed on untreated patient tumor tissue and matched patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this analysis was to characterize the transcriptional landscape of the tumors in the in vivo setting. 117 total samples were sequenced with paired reads on 10 lanes from different flowcells. They were loaded as 2400 separate files to maintain the data as it was received from BGI - each sample is therefore composed of 5 separate EGAN with 4 files each, adding a 0.1 - .. - 0.5 to each BioSample ID to generate sample aliases. All R1 (and R2, separately) files referring to a BioSample ID should be concatenated to obtain fastq files corresponding to single patients or PDXs.

  Dataset EGAD50000002278

• 16S rRNA gene V4 region sequencing data, ASV profiles, and sample metadata of human faecal samples predominantly from the Estonian population

  This dataset comprises 16S rRNA gene V4 region amplicon sequencing data generated from 1,826 human faecal samples, predominantly from the Estonian population. The dataset includes raw sequencing reads and processed amplicon sequence variant (ASV) outputs, consisting of ASV abundance tables, representative ASV sequences, and taxonomic assignments. In addition, a sample metadata table is provided, containing sample and host information, including sample identifier, sequencing run identifier, date of sampling, sex, age, height, weight, nationality, disease status, and Bristol stool type. Sequencing was performed using the Illumina MiSeq and iSeq 100 platforms. The cohort includes individuals with no reported disease (n = 889), gastrointestinal diseases (n = 217), allergies and asthma (n = 194), thyroid gland disorders (n = 117), cardiovascular diseases (n = 103), various general health conditions (n = 139), cancer (n = 28), diabetes (n = 20), gynaecological issues (n = 7). Disease status was unavailable for 112 samples.

  Dataset EGAD50000002306

• single-cell RNA-seq profiling of 2 patient derived colorectal cancer organoids after treatment with a combination of different anticancer drugs

  This dataset consists of single-cell RNA-seq profiling of colorectal cancer organoids derived from two patients. The organoids were profiled both after 4 weeks of treatment and after a drug holiday of two weeks. There are 49 RNA sequence files generated using single cell RNA sequencing technology from 10X genomics.

  Dataset EGAD50000001495

• Stabilising selection causes grossly altered but stable karyotypes in metastatic colorectal cancer

  Study EGAS00001004219

• Homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency and activity of PARP inhibition in primary triple negative breast cancer

  Study EGAS00001004190

• Cryopreservation of human cancers conserves tumour heterogeneity for single-cell multi-omics analysis

  Study EGAS00001005115

• Whole-genome sequencing study of uveal melanoma

  Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular cancer, characterized by metastasis-related mortality. Here, we explored whole-genome sequences from 40 primary uveal melanomas to illustrate the landscape of genomic mutations and investigate their association with prognosis.

  Study EGAS50000001603

• Enzymatic Methyl-Seq Rectal Mucus

  Enzymatic methyl sequencing of rectal mucus samples from patients suspected to have colorectal cancer. This is 1 of 4 sequencing experiments on the same sample type.

  Study EGAS50000001314

• Enzymatic methylation sequencing of rectal mucus from patients suspected to have colorectal cancer

  This dataset contains comprises enzymatic methylation sequencing (EM-Seq) data generated from 208 rectal mucus samples from patients suspected to have colorectal cancer and healthy controls. Targeted CpG sites were enriched using a panel of genes implicated in colorectal cancer, and libraries were prepared with NEBNext EM-Seq prior to Illumina sequencing. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform, producing paired-end FASTQ files. These data support analyses of DNA methylation patterns in CRC detection and progression

  Dataset EGAD50000001871

• Study on rectal mucus sampling for colorectal cancer diagnostics

  DAC for a study on rectal mucus sampling for colorectal cancer diagnostics

  Dac EGAC50000000643

• Extracellular vesicles from TGF-β-activated cancer-associated fibroblasts remodel the tumor microenvironment through EV surface-associated proteins.

  In this study, we explored the function of extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from non-activated cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and TGF-β-activated CAFs. We tested these two types of EVs on other cell types in the tumor environment, including cancer cells, CD8+ T cells, and CAFs. We further explored the protein cargo in EVs altered by TGF-β treatment using quantitative proteomics, and selected several highly upregulated proteins for further analysis. We found that the majority of these proteins were presented on the EV surface, and they regulated the target cells in an EV-cell contact dependent manner.

  Study EGAS50000000922

• Targeted sequencing (paired) of HR genes in primary and metastatic patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) of colorectal cancer (CRC)

  Chemotherapy is the standard-of-care treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and benefits some patients, but what distinguishes responders from non-responders is unclear. In this study, we leveraged a comprehensive collection of 69 molecularly annotated patient-derived xenografts to uncover functional predictors of response to 5-FU and irinotecan combination therapy (FOLFIRI) in mCRC. Genetic analyses revealed that treatment sensitivity was marked by genomic scars indicative of BRCAness, suggesting homologous recombination (HR) deficiency as a key determinant. Accordingly, we surveyed a manually curated panel of 44 genes with a documented role in HR for the potential presence of pathogenic mutations. We did not observe a specific enrichment of HR gene mutations based on response to FOLFIRI. This result, combined with the absence of widespread biallelic inactivation of the analyzed genes and the predominance of mutations categorized as variants of unknown significance, suggests that FOLFIRI sensitivity is not primarily governed by underlying mutations in HR genes responsible for mitigating the genotoxic effects of this therapeutic regimen.

  Study EGAS50000000075

• Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing of Patient Derived Xenografts

  Chemotherapy is the standard-of-care treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and benefits some patients, but what distinguishes responders from non-responders is unclear. In this study, we leveraged a comprehensive collection of 27 molecularly annotated patient-derived xenografts to uncover functional predictors of response to 5-FU and irinotecan combination therapy (FOLFIRI) in mCRC. Genetic analyses revealed that treatment sensitivity was marked by genomic scars indicative of BRCAness, suggesting homologous recombination (HR) deficiency as a key determinant. Accordingly, we surveyed a manually curated panel of 44 genes with a documented role in HR for the potential presence of pathogenic mutations. We did not observe a specific enrichment of HR gene mutations based on response to FOLFIRI. This result, combined with the absence of widespread biallelic inactivation of the analyzed genes and the predominance of mutations categorized as variants of unknown significance, suggests that FOLFIRI sensitivity is not primarily governed by underlying mutations in HR genes responsible for mitigating the genotoxic effects of this therapeutic regimen.

  Study EGAS50000000191

• Repotrectinib in NTRK fusion–positive advanced solid tumors: a phase 1/2 trial

  Early-generation TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) approved for treating NTRK fusion–positive (NTRK+) solid tumors provide clinical benefit; however, resistance emerges. Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1/TRK TKI with a compact macrocyclic structure designed to improve durability of response. TRIDENT-1 is a registrational phase 1/2 trial assessing repotrectinib, a next-generation ROS1/TRK TKI, in adults with advanced solid tumors, including NTRK+ disease. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response; secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and safety. Median follow-up ranged between 21.3 months and 25.7 months. In the TKI-naive cohort (n = 51; 95% confidence interval (CI)), the response rate was 59% (44–72); the median DOR was not estimable (NE); and the median PFS was 30.3 months (9.0–NE). In the TKI-pretreated cohort (n = 69; 95% CI), the response rate was 48% (36–60); the median DOR was 9.8 months (7.4–13.0); and the median PFS was 7.4 months (3.9–9.7). Of 30 TKI-pretreated patients with NTRK solvent front mutations, 16 had a response (53%; 95% CI: 34–72). Intracranial responses were observed in two of three TKI-naive patients and in four of six TKI-pretreated patients with measurable intracranial disease at baseline. Among all treated patients (n = 565), the most common any-grade treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was dizziness (57%); most TRAEs were low grade; and 4% discontinued repotrectinib due to a TRAE. Overall, repotrectinib demonstrated durable systemic and intracranial responses with generally low-grade adverse events in patients with NTRK+ solid tumors, including those with previous TRK TKI treatment and solvent front mutations. These results support the use repotrectinib to treat patients with NTRK+ solid tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03093116 .

  Study EGAS50000001572

• Circulating immune cell landscape in colorectal cancer patients

  To understand the circulating immune cells in colorectal cancer patients, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing for 14 PBMC samples from 14 colorectal cancer patients.

  Study EGAS50000000590

• Fragmentation signatures in cancer patients are similar to those in patients with vascular and autoimmune diseases

  The analysis of fragmentation patterns in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been shown to distinguish individuals with cancer from healthy controls in multiple case-controlled studies. However, there have been few studies that investigate various types cfDNA fragmentomics patterns in individuals with other diseases. For this purpose, we developed a comprehensive metric, called fragmentation signatures, that integrated the distributions of fragment positioning, fragment length, and fragment end-motifs. Using this metric, we found that individuals with venous thromboembolism, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, or scleroderma had cfDNA fragmentation signatures that closely mimicked those found in individuals with advanced cancers. Furthermore, these signatures were highly correlated with increases in inflammatory markers in the blood. Though these data put substantial limitations on the specificity of fragmentomics-based tests for cancer diagnostics, they also offer ways to improve the interpretability of such tests. Moreover, they should lead to a better understanding of the cells – most likely inflammatory cells - from which plasma cfDNA is derived.

  Study EGAS00001008004

• A cycling, progenitor-like cell population at the root of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor subtype differentiation trajectories

  Study EGAS00001008123

• Multi-modal analysis of pediatric pilocytic astrocytomas reveals tumor location-associated cellular and transcriptional heterogeneity

  Study EGAS00001008187

• IDH1 Somatic Mutation Profile in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

  The objective of this study is to identify somatic IDH1 mutations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma samples.

  Study EGAS50000001638

• Whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis of untreated head and neck cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) matched patient tumor tissue and normal mucosa tissue.

  WES analysis was performed on untreated patient tumor/normal mucosa tissue and matched patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to investigate the preservation of tumor-specific genomic alterations in the in vivo context.

  Study EGAS50000001622

• Whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis of untreated head and neck cancer patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) matched patient tumor tissue and normal mucosa tissue.

  WES analysis was performed on untreated patient tumor/normal mucosa tissue and matched patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to investigate the preservation of tumor-specific genomic alterations in the in vivo context. 183 total samples were sequenced with paired reads on 8-10 lanes from different flowcells. They were loaded as 3538 separate files to maintain the data as it was received from BGI - each sample is therefore composed of 5 separate EGAN with 2-4 files each, adding a 0.1 - .. - 0.5 to each BioSample ID to generate sample aliases. All R1 (and R2, separately) files referring to a BioSample ID should be concatenated to obtain fastq files corresponding to single patients or PDXs.

  Dataset EGAD50000002325

• Whole-genome sequencing of cell-free DNA from pancreatic and breast cancer cohorts for fragmentomic and tumor fraction analysis

  This project provides whole-genome sequencing data from cell-free DNA collected from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and breast cancer, alongside healthy and benign controls. The study aims to identify novel liquid biopsy biomarkers by exploring the relationship between per-base quality scores and fragmentomic signals like end-motifs and fragment length. Furthermore, the data supports the development of Bayesian deep learning frameworks for the uncertainty-aware estimation of tumor fraction and ploidy in low-concentration clinical samples.

  Study EGAS50000001620

• WGS of cfDNA in PDAC Breast Cancer and Matched Controls

  This dataset contains WGS data derived from plasma cfDNA. The cohort includes PDAC and breast cancer patients alongside matched controls. These data are intended to support research into ctDNA and genomic fragmentation patterns.

  Dataset EGAD50000002323

• Subgroup-specific gene expression profiles and mixed epistasis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (HIPO, H005)

  Study EGAS00001006361

• WTS data from PASS-01 trial

  WTS data for pancreatic cancer samples (PASS-01 Trial; Knox et al., Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025).  The dataset includes tumour bam files sequenced on Illumina HiSeq/NovaSeq and aligned against GRCh38 (n=115 tumours)

  Dataset EGAD50000002308

• WGS data from PASS-01 trial

  WGS data for pancreatic cancer samples (PASS-01 Trial; Knox et al., Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025).  The dataset includes tumour and normal cram files sequenced on Illumina HiSeq/NovaSeq and aligned against GRCh38 (n=127 tumour/normal pairs)

  Dataset EGAD50000002309

• WGS data from 20 cholangiocarcinoma cases

  WGS data from biliary tract cancer samples (Holzapfel, et al., J Gastrointest Oncol,14(1):379-389, 2023). The dataset includes tumour and normal BAM files sequenced on Illumina HiSeq/NovaSeq and aligned against GRCh38 (n=20 tumour/normal pairs).

  Dataset EGAD50000002307

• Myeloid cell networks govern re-establishment of original immune landscapes in recurrent ovarian cancer

  Immunotherapy has produced disappointing results in recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). However, the prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is largely based on the analysis of treatment-naive tumours. To understand the immunobiology of recurrent cancers, and their evolution, we profiled a total of 697 OC tumour samples (566 primary and 131 recurrent including 69 patient-matched samples) from 595 patients of five independent multi-institutional cohorts. By capturing heterogeneous TIL distributions, we identified four immune phenotypes associated with differential prognosis, TILs states and TILs:myeloid networks, which dictate malignant progression after chemotherapy and recurrence. Notably, recurrent tumours recapitulate the immunogenic landscapes of original cancers. Mirroring inflamed human OC, preclinical recurrent Brca1mut tumours maintained activated TILs:dendritic cells (DCs) niches but evaded immune control through COX/PGE2 signaling upregulation. Conversely, recurrent Brca1wt tumours displayed loss of TILs:DCs niches and accumulated immunosuppressive myeloid networks featuring Trem2/ApoEhigh TAMs and Nduf4l2high/Galectin3high malignant states. Our study highlights that persistent immunogenicity in recurrent OC is governed by the BRCA-dependent crosstalk between dissimilar myeloid cells and TILs. We propose new targets to modulate the malignant and TAM compartments which improve efficacy of standard of care chemotherapy in mouse OC models with HR deficiency.

  Study EGAS50000001069

• BCAC TIIC Data

  Data on spatially-resolved tissue infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) from 17,265 breast cancer patients of European descent, from studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, together with linked clinical data.

  Study EGAS50000001477

• ECM-free patient-derived organoids preserve diverse prostate cancer lineages and uncover in vitro-enriched cell types

  Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) hold promise for modeling various cancers, yet their application in prostate cancer (PCa) has been limited due to low culture success and the predominance of non-tumor-like cells. Using 164 PCa samples and optimizing culture conditions, we demonstrate that an extracellular matrix (ECM)-free culture method improves PDO take-rates, fostering cell populations with luminal and PCa-specific characteristics. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) reveals that these ECM-free PDOs closely mirror their original tumors at the transcriptomic level and maintain a diverse array of tumor cell types, unlike traditional Matrigel-based cultures which predominantly yield benign-like cells. This study introduces a PCa PDO single-cell atlas, providing a valuable resource for advancing prostate cancer research.

  Study EGAS50000000807

• How to use the EGA search box

  Tips on how to search Tip 1: Use simple and clear keywords No matter what you are searching: a study, a dataset or a committee; the search will look recursively in all the fields of all the entities in the database. Thus, there is no need to specify which type of data you are looking for. Try to use single and specific words and avoid long and complex expressions. Try it out: cancer rna-seq instead of cancer studies using RNA-seq. Tip 2: Narrow your results using search operators Search operators give you more control over the results. They manage the way keywords are used to restrict the search. By default, the search engine applies an OR operator when a space is inserted between two words. Include AND (capitalised) between the keywords in your search in order to show only pages containing both terms. Try it out: Search all the studies based on transcriptomic data, including those ones that use RNA sequencing to obtain this data. Tip 3: Do not worry about details The search engine automatically checks for the most common spelling mistakes of given words and suggests the use of the correct version. It also ignores capital letters and most punctuation so none of these mistakes will hamper the accuracy of your search. Besides, when using a combination of words, the search engine will suggest similar combinations with a higher number of results. Tip 4: Use words that are likely to appear within the text Unfortunately, our search engine is not able to interpret words yet. Therefore, words which do not appear in the body text will not return any result despite them denoting a group of present terms. For instance, if we are looking for studies focused on neurological diseases, using neurological as a keyword would not be the best option. Instead, you should use the name of each neurological disease such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or depression. In the same fashion, incomplete words do not return any result. Please include an asterisk (*) before and/or after the incomplete word in order to allow for partial matching. Try it out: canc* instead of canc(without wildcard). Also you can try out *oma, or even *geneti* Tip 5: Narrow down your search by filtering the results You can filter the results by the following options: general, study, and dataset. Under these categories, you will find more sub-filters to refine your search. Make sure that you click on Apply in order to filter the results. You can clear the filtering anytime. Advanced Searches Additional example queries: Search for DUO:0000005 and word lung example query Or write: DUO:0000005 AND lung Search for an exome sequencing study in dbGaP example query Or write: study_type: "exome sequencing" AND repository:dbGaP Search for an exome sequencing study in EGA example query Or write: study_type: "exome sequencing" AND repository:ega Search for a dataset that is at the EGA beacon and with type "Whole genome sequencing" and with number of samples between 100 and 2000 and with technology "Illumina HiSeq 2000" example query Or write: is_in_beacon:true AND dataset_types:"Whole genome sequencing" AND samples:[100 TO 2000] AND dataset_technologies:"Illumina HiSeq 2000" Search for PMIDS example query Or write: pmids:32025007

  Documentation discovery/metadata/search-box

• EGA synthetic data

  Synthetic Data One of the limitations in genomics research is that human genomics data is not openly available; access must be controlled according to participant consent agreements and data protection regulations such as GDPR. Obtaining authorization to access such data can sometimes take a long time, resulting in delays to important research work. In this context, synthetic genomic and phenotype data can be useful resources for researchers to avoid these delays. Synthetic data are artificially generated datasets, often created with algorithms, which can be used without the need for authorization to test new products and tools, build technical demonstrators, validate data models, and train AI models. The EGA provides access to synthetic cohort datasets augmented with rich synthetic metadata that overcomes these real data usage restrictions. Whilst synthetic datasets are not included in the general EGA mandate and services, we can consider such submissions and evaluate their acceptance on the basis of their unique use cases not already covered by existing synthetic datasets. Access to synthetic data studies is managed by the EGA Helpdesk Data Access Committee. Study ID Title Located in EGAS00001002472 CINECA synthetic cohort EUROPE UK1 referencing fake samples Central EGA EGAS00001005591 Synthetic data - Genome in a Bottle Central EGA EGAS00001005042 Test Study for EGA using data from 1000 Genomes Project - Phase 3 Central EGA EGAS00001005702 Human genomic and phenotypic synthetic data for the study of rare diseases Central EGA EGAS50000000190 EOSC4Cancer Synthetic Colorectal Cancer Genomic data Central EGA EGAS50000000086 Synthetic - FEGA Sweden Heilsa synthetic dataset December 2023 Federated EGA Sweden EGAS50000000678 Synthetic - GDI synthetic data Federated EGA Spain

  Documentation synthetic-data

• Submission FAQ

  Submission FAQ Before Submission Is the EGA the right archive for my data? TThe most suitable archive for your data is dependent on the type of data you are wishing to submit and whether the data require public or controlled access. Public access is defined as complete and open access to all submitted data. On the contrary, controlled access, exerted by the EGA, requires formal applications to be made to access the submitted data files and metadata. EGA only accepts human-derived data subject to controlled access. If your submission contains other types of data, please choose the appropriate repository for it (see image below): ENA, EVA, ArrayExpress, BioSD and GWAS catalog.  Should your submission be subjected to controlled access? Data access conditions are normally defined in the original informed consent agreements signed by the participants involved in your study. All data submitted to the EGA is subject to controlled access. These consents prevent the derived data files, potentially identifiable, from being dispersed by open and public access. Controlled access data often refers to human data derived from medical research and consortium projects. If in doubt, consult the informed consent agreements that apply to your study The EGA enables you to hold a submission before publication. What data types can be submitted to the EGA? Data types accepted by the EGA can be split into three categories: Sequences: both in generic and platform-specific formats. Array-based: from raw signal files to processed matrices. Phenotypes: all possible phenotype formats are accepted. All manufacturer-specific raw data formats derived from major next generation sequencing platforms are accepted. Also generic sequence formats: flat reads in a FASTQ file, aligned sequences (BAM or CRAM files) as well as sequence variation files in VCF format. All array-based technologies are accepted, including raw data, intensity and analysis files, without any restriction on data formats accepted. We also accept and distribute phenotype data (associated to the samples) in almost any format: from an image to a README file. How long does a submission take? Submissions to EGA come in a variety of formats and sizes, thus it is difficult for us to exactly predict how long a submission will take. We, therefore, advise all of our submitters to allow as much time as possible to make a submission. Based on previous records, we anticipate that the submission process may take at least one month. The submitter’s familiarity with the procedures, possible technical issues that may arise during submission and the amount of data that is being submitted are the main factors that will affect the length of the submission process. However, each step of a regular submission should be considered when estimating the time it would take: Encryption of the files Upload of the files Metadata submission Archival of the files Release of the study and datasets to EGA webpage For example, the upload of the files depends on the submission size, while metadata submission mainly relies on each submitter’s expertise. Further, some steps (e.g. answering to inquiries) depend on the EGA Helpdesk team, which may take some days to be processed during busy times Is data deposited in the EGA secure? The EGA set-up consists of a secure computing facility for data processing, a shared EBI set-up for data submissions and distribution of data via data requests made through the EGA website. Data is also copied in the Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC) infrastructure, where all stored and distributed data is encrypted Data is encrypted along the submission process and stored securely, granting its access to authorised users exclusively. During the download process, through our Python Client or Aspera, all requested data is downloaded over secure https connections. All data at the EGA is encrypted, and only accessible (for log-in and download) through secure protocols. For further information please, visit our security overview. What documentation do I need to provide? All submissions require policy’s documentation: 'Data Access Agreement (DAA)', 'Data Processing Agreement (DPA)' and 'Authorized Submitters Formulary'. The data processors (EGA) and the data owners will also sign the DPA. Will all metadata be public? Among the submitted metadata we need to make the distinction between identifiable and unidentifiable metadata: (1) the former may allow the identification of the human the sample derived from (e.g. detailed geographical providence, personal name, family ancestry…); (2) while the latter can be used to interpret the data without compromising the anonymity of the patients. The majority of the metadata submitted to the EGA corresponds to the unidentifiable category (e.g. sequencer's model). This type of metadata is publicly available on the EGA website and other EBI resources/partners’ websites. On the other hand, some parts samples’ metadata are subject to being identifiable, and thus only accessible by authorized data requesters, with the exception of: 5 submitter-defined attributes of the sample: alias, title, subject_id, gender and phenotype. It is the submitter’s responsibility not to submit sensitive metadata in these public fields. 3 anonymised fields that pinpoint the sample record in archivals: sample’s EGA stable ID (EGAN…), BioSample ID (SAMEA…) and submitter’s center name. During Submission Are there any sample specific requirements for EGA? All samples submitted to the EGA must include the attributes of biological sex, subject ID (anonymised individual identifier) and phenotype information. These are critical for data findability and its analysis, and we highly recommend using controlled ontology terms where applicable. For example: defining tumour and non-tumour samples and/or defining disease state. The EGA recommends using the Experimental Factor Ontology Database to find ontologized terms that describe your sample phenotypes. How do I get an accession number to use in my publication? You will receive your study accession number (EGAS…) upon complete your submission, either: Programmatically. As soon as the metadata is submitted and validated your study will be assigned an accession number that will be given in the submission’s response. Manually registering your study and relevant metadata using the online metadata submission tool: the EGA submitter Portal. How are files uploaded to the EGA? Data files are uploaded into private submission drop boxes (i.e. environments to which you are granted access and where you can transfer your files) using INBOX or FTP. These spaces are provided as part of the submission procedure. Before uploading any file, you must encrypt your files, . Only encrypted files shall be uploaded to the drop boxes. Why does data need to to encrypted for my submitted files? It is one of the security steps the EGA has implemented. In case of a security breach, people without the proper encryption key will not be able to read or use the information that could have been leaked. This measure is essential when working with sensitive data, such as controlled access human data. All submitters must use crypt4gh to create EGA compliant files prior to uploading them. This encryption is GPG-based, using EGA’s public key. Why are my files not available if I see them in the INBOX? There exists a time window between the data upload and the availability of such files via the Submitter Portal. For this reason, some metadata (run and analysis objects) cannot be registered until at least 24 hours after the files have been uploaded to your box. Why are MD5 sum values generated for my submitted files? We require pre- and post- encryption MD5 (message-digest) checksum values to be provided for all submitted files. These 128-bit values are computed using the content of each file, creating unique sequences that allow us to ensure that file integrity has been maintained during the transfer process. In other words, if the MD5 checksums we generate and those you generated match, we infer that the content of the transferred files is correct (i.e. files are not corrupted or truncated). MD5 checksums are computed automatically using the crypt4gh tool provided. Your submission will not be accepted and may be significantly delayed if you do not provide MD5 checksum values for all data files in the required format. How can I check if my files are correctly uploaded to the inbox? It is important to check the status pf your file so you know whether your files are in the inbox, being processed, or if there is any issue with one of them. In order to check this, you should: Look for the file locally. Drag and drop it to the file table. Then bars will appear on the table, which means that we are processing it. Green: The files checksum are correct and your file will move to “ingested files”. No further actions are needed from your end.. Red: The files checksum does not match and your file needs to be re-uploaded. Please re-upload relevant files to your inbox using the same path. After Submission How do I use my accession number in my publication? We suggest the use of the below template, using your study accession ID (EGAS…) : Data has been deposited at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA), which is hosted by the EBI and the CRG, under accession number EGASXXXXXXXXXXX. Further information about EGA can be found at https://ega-archive.org and "The European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical research" Your study ID will be the one that groups your whole submission, and thus its usage is recommended as such. Nevertheless, all metadata submitted to EGA hold a unique and persistent identifier (starting with EGA…) that can be used to identify specific records. For example, you could reference a specific dataset (EGAD…) or sample (EGAN…) in your publications (see full list of identifiers). How do I make my data searchable? Once you have finalized your submission, you can schedule the data release. Please take into account that the release process needs time for the files to be archived in our system, and for the Helpdesk team to validate your submission. Can I withdraw (meta)data from the EGA? We have methods in place for the secure removal of deposited (meta)data. Contact EGA-helpdesk for further details. EGA complies with FAIRness of (meta)data, and thus, even when the data is removed we keep an entry for their identifiers in our system. In other words, we execute a soft delete on canceled objects (e.g. a study): metadata is still stored in our systems, but it loses all links, cannot be queried and data files cannot be retrieved anymore. The reason behind this behaviour is so that queries using withdrawn data properly respond back (see example of a canceled study). What happens to the data once it has been submitted to the EGA? When the data is submitted, the submitter can choose either keep their data private or schedule the release of their data.

  Documentation submission/metadata/submission/FAQ