16766 results for "sec+and+unspecified+malignant+neoplasm"

in 54.24 milliseconds.

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB43_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB43_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001749

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB43_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB43_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001748

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB42_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB42_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001747

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB42_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB42_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001746

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB42_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB42_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001745

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB41_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB41_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001744

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB41_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB41_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001743

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB41_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB41_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001742

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB40_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB40_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001741

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB40_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB40_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001740

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB40_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB40_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001739

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB38_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB38_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001737

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB38_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB38_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001736

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB35_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB35_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001735

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB35_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB35_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001734

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB35_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB35_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001733

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB33_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB33_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001732

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB33_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB33_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001730

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB31_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB31_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001729

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB31_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB31_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001727

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB30_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB30_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001726

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB30_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB30_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001725

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB30_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB30_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001724

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB28_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB28_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001723

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB28_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB28_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001722

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB27_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB27_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001720

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB27_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB27_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001719

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB27_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB27_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001718

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB25_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB25_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001717

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB25_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB25_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001716

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB25_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB25_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001715

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB24_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB24_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001714

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB24_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB24_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001712

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB23_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB23_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001711

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB10_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB10_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001694

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB10_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB10_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001695

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB10_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB10_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001696

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB15_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB15_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001697

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB15_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB15_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001698

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB15_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB15_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001699

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB1_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB1_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001700

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB1_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB1_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001701

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB1_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB1_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001702

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB21_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB21_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001703

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB21_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB21_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001704

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB21_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB21_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001705

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB22_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB22_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001707

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB22_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB22_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001706

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB51_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB51_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001762

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB52_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB52_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001764

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB55_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB55_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001766

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB55_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB55_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001768

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB58_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB58_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001773

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB58_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB58_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001774

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB8_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB8_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001781

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: BvB8_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: BvB8_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001783

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: MW14_F

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: MW14_F

  Dataset EGAD00001001788

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: MW20_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: MW20_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001796

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: MW22_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: MW22_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001799

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: MW2_M

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: MW2_M

  Dataset EGAD00001001813

• WGS of 50 Intellectual Disability (ID) trios with Complete Genomics Sequencing. Dataset of sample: MW32_C

  50 trios were whole genome sequenced with Complete Genomics to a depth of 80x. For each trio the child was affected with severe ID, and the parents were unaffected. All trios were negative for array, targeted gene and whole exome screening. Dataset consists of sample: MW32_C

  Dataset EGAD00001001814

• ENGAGE - Amendment "500 genes exon sequencing"

  The ENGAGE project is a FP7 funded EU project aiming to combine genetic and phenotype information from European population based cohorts. In this sub-project we aim to do whole exome sequencing of individuals selected from Health 2000 and FINRISK cohorts. Individuals have been selected based on their metabolic trait phenotypes

  Dataset EGAD00001000403

• Whole-exome sequencing of rare autoimmune-related phenotypes

  We aim to whole-exome sequence DNA samples from 75 individuals with severe forms of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and related autoimmune diseases to identify the rare, highly penetrant, variants that we believe underlie these phenotypes. Case samples will be obtained from both new and existing (UK IBD Genetics Consortium) collaborators to ensure only the most extreme cases are sequenced.

  Dataset EGAD00001000408

• Whole Genome Sequencing of hiPS cells

  Human induced pluripotent stem (hiPS) cells hold great promise for regenerative medicine. Safety issues of use of hiPS cells however remain to be addressed. One of such issues is mutations derived from somatic donor cells and introduced during genome manipulation. We sequence whole genomes of hiPS cells and analyzed mutations. Our study brings hiPS cell technology one step closer to application to regenerative medicine.

  Dataset EGAD00001000362

• Congenital anosmia 2

  Congenital anosmias can be complete (the lack of a sense of smell) or specific (the inability to detect specific smells). Here we obtained genomic DNA from families with multiple individuals with anosmia, suggesting they are congenital. These include those inherited in a manner consistent with dominant and recessive alleles. We have sequenced the exomes of both affected and unaffected family members on the Illumina platform.

  Dataset EGAD00001002228

• Transcriptome/Exome for glioblastoma intra-tumoral heterogeneity

  Total of 49 tumor specimens from 20 patients were subjected for whole-exome and/or whole-transcriptome sequencing including matched normal/blood. Tumor samples are acquired based on 4 categories; 1) locally adjacent tumors, 2) multifocal/multicentric tumors, 3) 5-ALA (+/-) tumors and 4) Longitudinal tumors.

  Dataset EGAD00001002248

• Transcriptome and Exome from longitudinal samples of human glioblastoma (newly added after 2015)

  We expanded our previous collection of longitudinal GBM patients (EGAS00001001041) by recruiting 21 additional patients. Tumor specimens were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (16 of 21 cases, with the matched normal/blood) and transcriptome sequencing (16 of 21 cases).

  Dataset EGAD00001002143

• Epigenomics and Single-cell Sequencing Define Cellular Heterogeneity in Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis

  Epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) biopsies. Single-cell RNA-seq (10x Genomics) of seven LCH biopsies. ATAC-seq data from four sorted cell populations (in duplicate) from one LCH biopsy.

  Dataset EGAD00001005280

• H3Africa H3AChipDesign Phenotype

  Basic phenotypic data (country, ethnicity and sex) for 348 samples of the H3Africa Chip Design Study. Divided into 8 datasets of 41 samples from Zambia, 24 samples from Cameroon, 50 samples from Mali, 26 samples from Cameroon, 49 samples from Nigeria, 48 samples from Botswana, 50 samples from Benin, 60 samples from Burkina Faso and Ghana.

  Dataset EGAD00001005310

• Exome sequencing of 277 rainforest hunter-gatherers and neighbouring farmers from Central Africa

  Exome sequencing of 277 rainforest hunter-gatherers (RHG) and neighbouring farmers (AGR) from Central Africa was performed based on the Nextera Rapid Capture Expanded Exome Kit (62-Mb content) with the Illumina HiSeq 2500. After QC filters, exomes of 266 unrelated individuals were obtained at high coverage (Lopez et al., Curr Biol 2019).

  Dataset EGAD00001005138

• 666PG Whole genome alignment

  Aligned whole genome sequences in this dataset are from CPCG-GENE Normal/Tumor pairs used in the 666PG study. Raw sequences data was aligned against the human reference (GRCh37 + decoy) using bwa-mem and GATK for indel-realignment and recalibration

  Dataset EGAD00001004957

• BAM files of Roma and non-Roma Romanians

  BAM files (Illumina HiSeq 2000) with whole genome sequencing data of 49 individuals of European/Romanian descent, and 50 individuals of Roma (Romani/Rroma) ethnic background from Romania.

  Dataset EGAD00001004981

• Whole genome sequencing

  The diversity and heterogeneity within high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is not well understood. We performed whole genome sequencing on primary and metastatic sites from highly clinically annotated HGSC samples. Samples were obtained pre-treatment based on a laparoscopic triage algorithm from patients who underwent R0 tumor debulking, or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with excellent or poor response.

  Dataset EGAD00001005240

• Optimizing Primary Stroke Prevention in Children with Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP II)

  The STOP II trial evaluated whether prophylactic transfusion in patients with sickle cell disease and high risk of stroke can be safely halted after 30 months of treatment during which patients became low risk for stroke.Stroke causes substantial morbidity in children with sickle cell disease. To prevent first strokes, the Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia (STOP) used prophylactic transfusions in children who were identified by transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography as being at high risk for stroke. This strategy reduced the incidence of stroke among such children from 10% per year to less than 1% per year, leading to recommendations for TCD screening and prophylactic transfusion for children with abnormal velocities on ultrasonography. Despite the reduced risk of stroke, long-term use of transfusions can cause adverse side effects, such as iron overload or alloimmunization. However, cessation of transfusions is associated with recurrence of stroke, and at the time of the STOP II trial, there were no clinical or laboratory indicators to guide the duration of prophylaxis. Therefore the STOP II trial was initiated to determine whether transfusions could be limited by monitoring patients with TCD examinations after transfusions were halted and resuming transfusions if the examination indicated a high risk of stroke.The trial was halted for safety concerns after 79 of a planned 100 children were randomized. Discontinuation of transfusion for the prevention of stroke in children with sickle cell disease resulted in a high rate of reversion to abnormal blood-flow velocities on Doppler studies and stroke incidence.Instructions for requesting individual-level data are available on BioData Catalyst at https://biodatacatalyst.nhlbi.nih.gov/resources/data/. Apply for data access in dbGaP. Upon approval, users may begin accessing requested data in BioData Catalyst. For questions about availability, you may contact the BioData Catalyst team at https://biodatacatalyst.nhlbi.nih.gov/contact.

  Study phs002386

• Genome-wide Association Study of Myasthenia Gravis

  The purpose of this project was to conduct a genome-wide associate study to search for the genetic factors that predispose to myasthenia gravis. The rationale for this study lies in the fact that, although the immunological and physiological processes affecting the neuromuscular junctions of myasthenia gravis patients are well understood, the spectrum of genetic factors that predispose to myasthenia gravis and influence its disease manifestations are not well known. Identification of the myasthenia gravis-related genes will shed light on the fundamental cellular events underlying myasthenia gravis, and will provide focus for research aimed at developing therapies that alter the natural course of the disease. A consortium of fourteen institutions in North America collected DNA samples from 1028 people diagnosed with autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Relevant clinical data have been collected for each patient, including age of onset, severity of disease, response to drug therapy, personal and family history of other autoimmune diseases. Genotyping of the case cohort was performed in the Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Genotyping of the case cohort was performed using the HumanOmniExpress-12v1_C SNP array manufactured by Illumina Inc. For the control cohort, we downloaded genotype data from dbGAP (accession phs000196.v2.p1) for 1,998 US neurologically normal individuals. The control cohort had been previously genotyped at the Center for Inherited Disease Research at Johns Hopkins University on HumanOmni1-Quad version 1.0B beadchips (Illumina) as part of the NeuroGenetics Research Consortium GWAS of Parkinson's disease. Analyses were confined to the 677,673 autosomal SNPs that were common to both chips. Of the 1028 samples which were genotyped, 21 samples were excluded due to mismatched genders, 9 were excluded due to low genotype call rate, 5 samples were excluded as duplicates, and 25 samples were excluded as ethnic outliers. The remaining 972 samples were used in analysis.

  Study phs000726

• Parallel CRISPR Editing of Familial ALS Mutations

  Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) provide a modeling system for human disease within the critical context of the human genome. CRISPR editing of iPSCs allows the construction of isogenic pairs where the cells have nearly identical genomes except for the desired edited change. Here, we used CRISPR editing on a healthy control line to generate three new isogenic iPSC lines that each contains a different familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS) mutation (TARDBP[G298S/+], SOD1[G85R/+], and PFN1[G118V/+]). As controls for each mutation, we retained iPSC lines that went through the editing process but did not have the desired heterozygous mutation. We have also performed editing in a patient cell line with a hexanucleotide repeat in C9ORF72. This edit mutates a non-canonical start codon upstream of the hexanucleotide repeat. These edited lines have been used in three different studies:(1) In “Human sensorimotor organoids derived from healthy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis stem cells form neuromuscular junctions” (PMID: 34362895), we performed exome sequencing to confirm the absence of off-target CRISPR events. We also performed single-cell sequencing on sensorimotor organoids from a second healthy control iPSC line, which is deposited alongside the exome sequencing data.(2) In “iPSC motor neurons, but not other derived cell types, capture gene expression changes in postmortem sporadic ALS motor neurons (PMID: 37651231), we differentiated these isogenic lines into motor neurons, sensory neurons, cortical neurons, and astrocytes and then performed bulk RNA-sequencing. We then assessed similarities between fALS mutations, differences between cell types, and the capacity of iPSC modeling to capture differentially expressed genes in postmortem sporadic ALS motor neurons.(3) In "Blocking RAN translation without altering RNA foci rescues C9ORF72-related ALS/FTD phenotypes" (Jiang et al. 2025), we mutate a non-canonical start codon upstream of a hexanucleotide repeat in C9ORF72. This mitigates several phenotypes related to neurodegeneration.

  Study phs002440

• Intra-tumor heterogeneity of localized lung adenocarcinomas defined by multi-region sequencing

  Background: Intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) may have profound impacts on biopsy strategy, characterization of actionable targets, treatment planning, and drug resistance. ITH of lung cancers has not been well studied. Methods: We performed multi-region whole exome sequencing (average sequencing depth 277x) on 48 tumor regions from 11 resected lung adenocarcinomas (8 stage I, 2 stage II and one stage III tumors) followed by deep sequencing validation (average sequencing depth 863x). Results: All tumors showed clear evidence of spatial ITH. On average, 76% of all mutations and 20/21 known cancer gene mutations were present in all regions of individual tumors (trunk mutations). Copy number analysis did not show substantial difference in large-scale chromosome aberrations. A canonical KRAS p.G12C mutation was detected in only 1 of 4 tumor regions (branch mutations) at exome depth but detected in all four tumor regions (trunk mutations) at increased sequencing depth. In addition, many heterogeneous branch mutations defined by exome sequencing were detectable in all regions of individual tumors with increasing sequencing depth. Significant differences in mutational spectrum were observed in 6 tumors indicating that specific mutational processes were likely operative at different times during development of these tumors. With a median follow up of 21 months post surgery, 3 patients have relapsed and all 3 patients presented with significantly larger fractions of subclonal mutations in their primary tumors. Conclusions: Although multi-region sampling is still required to fully assess ITH complexity, single biopsy analysis at appropriate depth might be sufficient to identify the majority of known cancer gene mutations in localized lung adenocarcinomas. Larger subclonal mutation fractions may be associated with increased likelihood of postsurgical relapse in patients with localized lung adenocarcinomas. Studies on larger cohort, ideally with comprehensive clinical annotation and repeat biopsy at relapse are needed to fully understand the clinical impact of ITH.

  Study EGAS00001000930

• Programmatic submission based on XML

  Programmatic submissions (XML based) For further information please check our Submission FAQs, submission quickguide as well as submission terms! Introduction Besides the Submitter Portal tool, EGA supports programmatic sequence and clinical data metadata submissions. If you are not sure what this means, you may want to explore our brief metadata introduction. Programmatic submissions are recommended for array-based submission. Moreove, it may be of help if your submission is recurrent or it is difficult to manage manually due to its sheer size. Otherwise, we highly recommend using the Submitter Portal to perform submissions. In this page we will guide you through the required steps to programmatically submit data to the EGA. Programmatic submissions require your metadata to be structured for an easy and straightforward validation and archival. It basically consists in formatting your metadata as Extensible markup language (XML) files and submitting them to the EGA using the WEBIN Before submitting metadata to the EGA, it is important to ensure that the information in your XML files is compliant with our standards. You can see further details on how these standards are maintained at EGA at our EGA Schemas documentation page. Using WEBIN, you can validate your XML files against EGA's schemas to ensure that your metadata is compliant before submission. WEBIN services WEBIN production service WEBIN test service We advise you to submit your metadata to the test service when submitting to the production service for the first time. The test service is identical to the production service except that all submissions will be discarded in the following 24 hours. This allows you to learn about the submission process without having to worry about data being submitted. Authentication Authentication is required each time a submission is made. The submission service uses HTTPS protocol for metadata encryption and identification to provide a secure submission environment. Data file upload Both Runs and Analyses reference files (e.g. FASTQ need to be uploaded to the EGA before these metadata objects are submitted. In other words, if you submit a Run that references a file that we cannot find associated with your account, the metadata submission will fail. See further details on how to upload your files in our File Upload documentation. Metadata model of the EGA Our metadata model is formed by multiple metadata objects. Check further details in our documentation at our EGA Schema documentation page. Working with EGA XMLs files Now that the basic concepts of the EGA metadata have been described, you can start preparing your programmatic submission through XML. Here you will find the guidance on how to prepare the XML files. Programmatic Submission Tutorial Video Take a look at the Programmatic Submission Tutorial Video, which explains the workflow of a programmatic submission and goes over an example metadata submission. Programmatic Submission Tutorial Video. When building your XML files, we recommend using text editors (e.g.Sublime Text or VisualStudio) that allow you to visualise the structure of the XML with ease. Furthermore, these editors constantly check the consistency of the XML structure. Alternatively, and if the submission consists of a big number of objects (specially analyses), you may find the tool star2xml handy. This tool allows for a direct conversion between metadata in a tabular format (e.g. a spreadsheet) into XMLs. Identifying objects: Aliases and center names Every EGA object must be uniquely identified within the submission account using their alias attribute. The aliases can be used in submissions to make references between EGA objects. Let us dig into EGA's use of aliases and center names: alias: every object should have a name that is unique within your submission account. Once submitted successfully, every alias will be assigned a unique and permanent accession (EGA ID). refname: when an object references another by its alias, the alias of the referenced object goes into the "refname" attribute of the referencing object. For example, if a sample has the alias "sample1", and an experiment uses this sample, then the experiment's "EXPERIMENT/SAMPLE/refname" attribute should be "sample1". center_name: The "center_name" attribute is required within the submission XML and, if not provided when the object is submitted, it will be automatically filled using your default EGA account center_name. This element is the "controlled vocabulary acronym or abbreviation that is provided to the account holder when the account is first generated". If the submitter is brokering a submission for another institute, the submitter should use their special broker account name in broker_name while the data centre acronym remains in center_name. Log-in details should have been provided when you requested a submission account. Please contact our Helpdesk team if you have any questions. run_center: Many submitting centers contract out the actual sample sequencing to another center. In these cases, the sequencing center should be acknowledged in the run_center attribute. Again, this is controlled vocabulary and the acronym should be sought from EGA helpdesk before submitting. Please contact our Helpdesk team if you have any questions. Prepare your XMLs The goal of this section is to provide sufficient information to be able to create the metadata XML documents required for programmatic submissions. Please note, the EGA utilises the XML schemas maintained at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA). It is important due to the fact that by using a similar system, some pieces of documentation from the ENA's programmatic submission can also help you with your programmatic submission to the EGA. For example, you can submit programmatically without using a Submission XML by following the steps at Submission actions without submission XML. A submission does not have to contain all different types of XMLs. For example, it is possible to submit only a few samples; or a study that is later to be referenced. You can submit each object one by one, or submit all in a batch: you choose what method of submission works best for you. We do recommend, nevertheless, that you submit the objects to be referenced (e.g. samples or studies) first, and the objects that reference these (e.g. experiments or datasets) afterwards. You can see a graphical view of these objects and their relationships at our EGA Schemas page. Independently of the submission scenario, you will always require a Dataset XML. The entity of a dataset is what is used to control access to the given data, in the form of runs or analyses. In other words, when a requester is granted access, it is through the dataset and the objects (e.g. runs or analyses) that the dataset contains, granting access to them in one go. Given the nature of the EGA, a dataset XML will always be required for the data access. First, we will differentiate between submissions of "raw" and "processed" data: Runs and Analyses, respectively. Run data submissions Raw data derives from instruments "as is". For example, a plain sequence file (e.g. FASTQ or unaligned BAM files) would be considered raw data. A typical raw (unaligned) sequence read submission consists of 8 XMLs: Submission Study Sample Experiment Run DAC Policy Dataset When technical reads (e.g. barcodes, adaptors or linkers) are included in the submitted raw sequences, a spot descriptor must be submitted to describe the position of the technical reads so that they can be removed. The following data files can be submitted without providing spot descriptor information in the experiment/run XML: BAM files (single reads) SFF files (single reads without barcodes) FastQ files (single reads without any technical reads) Complete Genomics files Analysis data submissions Processed data is, in some way, refined raw data. This includes raw data that has been processed by some form of analysis method (e.g. alignment, noise reduction, etc.). For example, an aligned sequence (e.g. BAM file), that was created using raw FASTQ files, would be a processed file. This category includes most types of data: sequence alignment files (e.g. BAM or CRAM), clinical data (e.g. phenopackets), sequence variation files (e.g. VCF), sequence annotation, etc. A typical EGA analysis data submission consists of 7 EGA XML: Submission Study Sample Analysis DAC Policy Dataset We accept three different types of analysis data submissions: BAM files (for multiple read alignments) VCF files (for sequence variations) Phenotype files (in any format) In anycase, keep in mind that samples must be created in order to be referenced in the analyses. In other words, the provenance of the information within the BAM, VCF and phenotype files Example XMLs Below you can find a non-extensive list of example XMLs with descriptive fields (i.e. explaining what to provide in each field). Furthermore, you can also find real examples (i.e. the true value of the provided fields) in our GitHub repository. Submission XML The submission XML is used to validate, submit or update any number of other objects. The submission XML refers to other XMLs. New submissions use the ADD action to submit new objects. Object updates are done using the MODIFY action and objects can be validated using the VERIFY action. Descriptive submission XML example True values submission XML example Study XML The study XML is used to describe the study containing a title, a study type and abstract as it would appear in a publication. Descriptive study XML example True values study XML example Please use the following notation within the property "STUDY_LINKS" when including PubMed citations in the Study XML: <STUDY_LINKS> <STUDY_LINK> <XREF_LINK> <DB>PUBMED</DB> <ID>18987735</ID> </XREF_LINK> </STUDY_LINK> </STUDY_LINKS> Sample XML The sample XML is used to describe the samples used to obtain the data, whether they were sequenced, measured in any other way, or have an associated phenotype. The mandatory fields include information about the taxonomy of the sample, sex, subject ID and phenotype. For example, the mandatory attribute fields for each sample would look like these, within the array of "SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTES": <SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTES> <SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> <TAG>subject_id</TAG> <VALUE>free text!</VALUE> </SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> <SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> <TAG>sex</TAG> <VALUE>female/male/unknown</VALUE> </SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> <SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> <TAG>phenotype</TAG> <VALUE>Free text, EFO terms (e.g. EFO:0000574) are recommended</VALUE> </SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> </SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTES> Sample is one of the most important objects to be described biologically, it is highly recommended that “TAG-VALUE” pairs are generated as SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTES to describe the sample in as much detail as possible. For example, were we to give the population ancestry of the sample, we could add a new attribute to the array, in which, for example, we would indicate that the sample derives from an individual of "Mende in Sierra Leone" (MSL), with an african ancestry: <SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> <TAG>Population</TAG> <VALUE>MSL</VALUE> </SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> Given that VALUE and TAG are free text, the combinations are limitless in order to give you full flexibility on the information you want to provide. We recommend you use the Experimental Factor Ontology (EFO) to describe the phenotypes of your samples. You can provide more than one phenotype by adding more items to the array of SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTES. Phenotypes considered essential for understanding the data submission should be provided. Each phenotype described should be listed as a separate sample attribute <SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE> </SAMPLE_ATTRIBUTE>. There is no limit to the number of phenotypes that can be submitted. If a suitable EFO accession cannot be found for your phenotype attribute, please consider using another controlled ontology database (e.g. HPO, MONDO, etc.) before using free text. Descriptive sample XML example True values sample XML example Experiment XML The experiment XML is used to describe the experimental setup, including instrument platform and model details, library preparation details, and any additional information required to correctly interpret the submitted data. Where any of these values differ between runs, a new experiment object must exist, since runs are grouped by experiments. Each experiment references a study and a sample by alias, or if previously-submitted, by accession. Pooled data must be demultiplexed by barcode for submission. Descriptive experiment ( Illumina paired read ) XML example True values experiment ( Illumina paired read ) XML example Run XML The run XML is used to associate data files with experiments and typically comprises a single data file (e.g. a FASTQ file). Please note that pooled samples should be de-multiplexed prior submission and submitted as different runs. Descriptive run XML example True values run XML example Analysis XML Given that an analysis can be used to submit any type of processed data to the EGA, we will list below an example of each of the three most common types of analysis XMLs submitted to the EGA: sequence alignments (e.g. BAM files); sequence variation (e.g. VCF files); and clinical metadata or phenotypes (e.g. phenopackets). Regardless of the type of processed data submitted in the analysis, the analysis must be associated with a Study and can reference multiple types of other objects, from samples to experiments, if they are available at the EGA. Just like with Runs, whenever a file is submitted to the EGA through an analysis object, the file MD5 checksums must be present, in order for the EGA to validate file integrity upon transfer. This also includes index files when applicable (e.g. .bai.md5 files). Ideally, any analysis that uses a reference sequence for some kind of alignment (e.g. BAM, CRAM or VCF files), would contain metadata about the alignment, such as INSDC reference assemblies and sequences, by either using accessions (e.g. CM000663.1) or common labels (e.g. GRCh37). Read alignment (BAM) Analysis XML The Analysis can be used to submit BAM alignments to EGA. Only one BAM file can be submitted in each analysis and the samples used within the BAM read groups must be associated with Samples. Descriptive bam alignments XML example True values bam alignments XML example Sequence variation (VCF) Analysis XML The Analysis can be used to submit VCF files to EGA. Only one VCF file can be submitted in each analysis and the samples used within the VCF files must be associated with Samples. Download analysis XML (VCF) Phenotype files The Analysis XML can be used to submit phenotype files to the EGA. Only one phenotype file can be submitted in each analysis and the samples used within the phenotype files must be associated with EGA Samples. Download analysis XML (Phenotype) DAC XML The DAC XML describes the Data Access Committee (DAC) affiliated to the data submission. The DAC may consist of a group or a single individual and is responsible for the data access decisions based on the application procedure described in the POLICY.XML. As with any other object, if it was already submitted to the EGA, there is no need to submit it again: you can reference an existing object within the EGA. Hence, A DAC XML does not need to be provided if your submission is affiliated to an existing EGA DAC.. Further information on DACs can be found here, and you can always contact our Helpdesk team if you have further inquiries. Descriptive dac XML example True values dac XML example Policy XML The Policy XML describes the Data Access Agreement (DAA) to be affiliated to the named Data Access Committee. Descriptive policy XML example True values study XML example Dataset XML The dataset XML describes the data files, defined by the Run.XML and Analysis.XML, that make up the dataset and links the collection of data files to a specified Policy. The dataset xml is commonly the last metadata object to be submitted, since it references multiple other entities. Please consider the number of datasets that your submission consists of. For example, a case-control study is likely to consist of at least two datasets. In addition, we suggest that multiple datasets should be described for studies using the same samples but different sequence technologies. Descriptive dataset XML example True values dataset XML example Validating and submitting your EGA Validating EGA's XMLs through Webin After you have ensured that the XMLs are properly formatted and contain all the required information. You can proceed to validate and submit your data. Use the curl command to validate your XML file: Once you have prepared your XML file and asserted you have access to Webin, you can validate your XML file programmatically against EGA's schemas using the curl command. There are multiple ways in which you can validate your XMLs. This variety has to do with the fact that: (1) there are 2 instances of Webin (test and production); and (2) that validation is a default step during submission. In other words, any time that you submit your data through Webin, it will be validated automatically before being accepted. This allows for 4 possible routes of validation, all having the same validation result: validating or submitting to either the production service or the test service of Webin. For example, directly validating a "study" object XML in the testing service (wwwdev…) would look like the following: curl -u <USERNAME>:<PASSWORD> -F "ACTION=VALIDATE" "https://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/ena/submit/drop-box/submit/" -F "STUDY=@study.xml" In this command, you would need to replace <USERNAME> and <PASSWORD> with your EGA account username and password, respectively. You would also replace <INPUT_FILE> with the path to your XML file. A mock example would look like the following: curl -u ega-test-data@ebi.ac.uk:egarocks -F "ACTION=VALIDATE" "https://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/ena/submit/drop-box/submit/" -F "STUDY=@study.xml" The validation attempt can have different results depending on the given arguments: If your XML file is valid according to EGA's schemas, you will see a message indicating that your XML file is compliant. For example, see below for our mock example, where the "success" was "true" (i.e. no validation errors found). Nevertheless, notice how the "<STUDY accession=" is empty: it is because we were simply validating, so the study did not get an accession or ID. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="receipt.xsl"?> <RECEIPT receiptDate="2023-04-11T15:19:28.850+01:00" submissionFile="submission-EBI-TEST_1681222768850.xml" success="true"> <STUDY accession="" alias="Mock example" status="PRIVATE"/> <SUBMISSION accession="" alias="SUBMISSION-11-04-2023-15:19:28:840"/> <MESSAGES> <INFO>VALIDATE action has been specified.</INFO> <INFO>Submission has been rolled back.</INFO> <INFO>This submission is a TEST submission and will be discarded within 24 hours</INFO> </MESSAGES> <ACTIONS>VALIDATE</ACTIONS> <ACTIONS>PROTECT</ACTIONS> If there are any errors or warnings, the tool will display them, allowing you to correct them before submitting your data to EGA. For example, in the following response, it is said that the object we were trying to submit was already existing, and therefore the "success" was "false". <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="receipt.xsl"?> <RECEIPT receiptDate="2023-04-11T15:12:35.609+01:00" submissionFile="submission-EBI-TEST_1681222355609.xml" success="false"> <STUDY alias="Example!_Human Microbiome Project SP56J" status="PRIVATE" holdUntilDate="2023-03-11Z"/> <SUBMISSION alias="SUBMISSION-11-04-2023-15:12:35:576"/> <MESSAGES> <ERROR>In study, alias: "Example!_Human Microbiome Project SP56J". The object being added already exists in the submission account with accession: "ERP127584".</ERROR> <INFO>VALIDATE action has been specified.</INFO> <INFO>Submission has been rolled back.</INFO> <INFO>This submission is a TEST submission and will be discarded within 24 hours</INFO> </MESSAGES> <ACTIONS>VALIDATE</ACTIONS> <ACTIONS>PROTECT</ACTIONS> If the curl command retrieves no response at all, please double check if your username and password are correctly provided. Also notice the "ACTION=..." argument passed to the Curl command. This specifies the action to take during the call to Webin, so we do not need a "Submission" XML just for a validation attempt. See more at submission actions without submission XML. Furthermore, validation of multiple files or objects (e.g. sample, experiment, study…) can be done in a single command by adding more arguments (i.e. '-F'). For example: curl -u <USERNAME>:<PASSWORD> -F "ACTION=VALIDATE" "https://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/ena/submit/drop-box/submit/" -F "STUDY=@study.xml" -F "SAMPLE=@sample.xml" -F "DATASET=@dataset.xml" As mentioned above, beside "validate" action in the test environment, you can also validate your metadata by three other methods: "Validate" in the production server. From our example above, you simply need to take the "dev" away from the URL. curl -u <USERNAME>:<PASSWORD> -F "ACTION=VALIDATE" "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/submit/drop-box/submit/" -F "STUDY=@study.xml" "Add" in the development server. From our example above, you would simply need to replace the action: from "validate" to "add". Whatever is submitted to this service will be discarded in 24h, so whether something gets submitted or not would not matter in the long run. curl -u <USERNAME>:<PASSWORD> -F "ACTION=ADD" "https://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/ena/submit/drop-box/submit/" -F "STUDY=@study.xml" "Add" in the productionserver. A combination of the previous two methods, which would render this attempt into a submission. This path is just to be taken when you are sure your metadata is compliant and what you want to submit. curl -u <USERNAME>:<PASSWORD> -F "ACTION=ADD" "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/submit/drop-box/submit/" -F "STUDY=@study.xml" What happens after the submission of a dataset XML? Once you have completed the registration of your dataset/s please contact our Helpdesk Team to provide a release date for your study. Please note that all datasets affiliated to unreleased studies are automatically placed on hold until the authorised submitter or DAC contact contact the EGA Helpdesk for the study to be released. We strongly advise you not to delete your data until EGA Helpdesk confirms that your data has been successfully archived.

  Documentation submission/metadata/submission/programmatic-submission-xml

• Genetics of Neuropsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

  Although schizophrenia is a highly heritable disease, relatively little progress had been made in securely identifying the genetic causes of this disorder, and most instances of schizophrenia in the general population remain unexplained. One avenue of explanation for the genetic basis of schizophrenia, however, has been effectively closed by recent research. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have now shown that common variation makes at most a modest contribution to the risk of schizophrenia. At the same time that the role of common variation has been circumscribed by GWAS, however, the analysis of copy number variants that are detectable on a genome-wide scale has revealed and replicated a number of very rare variants that associate with schizophrenia. These rare copy number variants that have been implicated in schizophrenia, however, have one striking feature in common: they are all risk factors for other brain related disorders beyond schizophrenia such as mental retardation, autism and epilepsy. These findings argue that genetic risk factors may confer a highly penetrant vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorder, which is then further modified by interacting genetic or environmental factors to determine the ultimate manifestation. Most schizophrenia collections that are being studied today, however, have been selected precisely for their homogeneity: including only schizophrenia patients with no comorbidities, or schizophrenia patients with relatives who have schizophrenia but no other neuropsychiatric conditions. These selection criteria are inconsistent with what we now know about the bulk of the genetic differences that have been associated with disease. The central hypothesis of this project is that there are rare genetic variants that strongly elevate the risk of various neuropsychiatric diseases, and that these risk factors can be identified most readily in families segregating multiple neuropsychiatric conditions.

  Study phs000682

• Exome Sequencing for Diseases of the Immune System: X-linked Immunodeficiency with Magnesium Defect, EBV Infection, and Neoplasia (XMEN)

  The etiologies of primary immunodeficiencies often yield novel insights about the immune system. Although a genetic etiology has been suspected for patients with abnormally low CD4+ T cells in the absence of HIV infection or any known causes of lymphopenia, no genetic mutation has been described to date for any case of primary CD4 lymphopenia. In this study, we characterized a non-consanguineous family with two non-HIV infected boys exhibiting an inverted CD4 to CD8 T cell ratio and a history of recurrent chronic viral infections since birth. Consistent with a decreased thymic output of CD4+ T cells, the percentage of CD31+ cells in the CD4+ naive population of these patients was decreased. In addition, the activation of T cells was significantly impaired in the patient upon TCR stimulation. Given the mother&#39;s T cells show completely skewed X chromosome inactivation, we suspected that the nature of this disease is X-linked. We performed X-chromosome exon-capture targeted single-end Solexa sequencing on two brothers and the mother and found a 10 base pair deletion at an intron-exon junction of Magnesium Transporter 1 (MAGT1), a Mg2+ specific transporter. We confirmed that this deletion leads to altered splicing, frameshift, early termination of the mRNA, and deficient protein expression in the lymphocytes of the two patients. Moreover, knockdown of this transporter in T cells isolated from healthy donors can recapitulate the observed T cell activation defect while its ectopic expression in the patients&#39; lymphocytes can restore T cell stimulation. Our discovery highlights the significance of this transporter to T cell function.

  Study phs000365

• Genomic and epigenomic characterization of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML)

  Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is an aggressive myeloproliferative disorder of early childhood. While some cases show spontaneous remission, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment option for the majority of patients, however, the 5-year event-free survival reaches only about 50%. Hyperactive RAS signaling is assumed to be the main driving event in JMML. It is caused by genetic alterations in CBL, KRAS, NF1, NRAS, or PTPN11 in about 90% of patients. So far, there is no clear understanding of how RAS pathway mutations relate to the heterogeneous disease biology and variable clinical outcome seen in JMML patients. As a consequence, established clinical and genetic markers fail to fully represent the observed disease heterogeneity. We hypothesized that DNA methylation profiling, either alone or in combination with genetic alterations, might provide a molecular basis for disease classification. Genome wide DNA methylation analysis using the HumanMethylation450 Bead Chip array was performed in a discovery cohort of 20 patients (19 JMML, 1 Noonan syndrome). The clinical relevance of our findings was assessed in an unselected sample set consisting of 147 consecutive patients with JMML (n=129) or Noonan syndrome (n=18) associated myeloproliferative disorder (n=18) registered in the EWOG-MDS 1998 &amp; 2006 trials. Data integration was performed in a subset of patients with available exome sequencing (n=50) and expression profiling (n=15) data. This integrated approach identified three JMML subgroups characterized by distinct clinical and biological features. This analysis further suggested a molecular mechanism by which additional genetic events, presumably further activating the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, mediate DNA hypermethylation via up-regulation of DNMTs in more aggressive JMML cases.

  Study EGAS00001002511

• Intra-tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution patterns towards platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer

  Although many high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) patients are initially sensitive to the standard-of-care platinum-based therapy, intra-tumor heterogeneity may fuel selection towards platinum-resistant clones over subsequent lines of therapy. We performed whole-exome coupled to ultra-deep re-sequencing and copy number alteration (CNA) profiling on 31 matched diagnosis and relapse tumors from HGSOC patients treated with platinum. Genetic heterogeneity within tumor pairs varied extremely, with some recurrent tumors being identical and others completely different from the primary tumor. All primary tumors showed evidence of homologous recombination (HR)-deficiency, but none of them carried reactivating mutations in the HR pathway at relapse, also not when becoming resistant to subsequent lines of platinum. We did also not identify other mutations, CNAs or pathways that were enriched in platinum-resistant clones. However, a platinum score consisting of 13 CNAs correlated significantly with platinum-free interval (PFI) after first-line therapy in multiple cohorts of &gt;450 primary HGSOCs. A relative increase of this score in the relapsed tumor correlated with a change in PFI during subsequent therapy. Clonal evolution under platinum therapy contributes to genetic heterogeneity within tumor pairs, implicating that genetic tests linked to targeted treatment options for recurrent HGSOC need to be performed on biopsies collected at relapse. Platinum resistance of an initially platinum-sensitive HR-deficient HGSOC at relapse is not caused by reactivation of the HR pathway, suggesting that these tumors are still responsive to PARP inhibitors, instead, several chromosomal aberrations contribute to a score predictive of disease outcome under platinum therapy, both in first and subsequent lines of platinum therapy.

  Study EGAS00001001244

• Pharmacological and genomic profiling identifies NFκB-targeted treatment strategies for mantle cell lymphoma

  Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by poor prognosis, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies1. In this study, we employed large-scale pharmacological profiling of 16 pathway inhibitors across more than 100 hematological cell line models to identify novel therapeutic approaches. This screen identified a subset of MCL cell lines that were highly sensitive to the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling inhibitors ibrutinib and sotrastaurin (STN), which are currently in clinical trials2, 3. Sensitive MCL models exhibited chronic activation of the CARD11-BCL10-MALT1 (CBM) complex and dependency on downstream classical NFκB signaling. In contrast, insensitive cell lines displayed activation of the alternative NFκB pathway. Massively parallel transcriptome sequencing identified mutations in negative regulators of the alternative NFκB pathway in ibrutinib-insensitive cell lines. Notably, sequencing of 165 MCL patient samples revealed that components of the alternative NFκB pathway, particularly TRAF2 and BIRC3, are mutated in roughly 15% of MCL patients. Functional analyses of patient-derived BIRC3 mutant alleles indicated that these are loss-of-function mutants that constitutively activate alternative NFκB signaling. While being associated with insensitivity to ibrutinib, genetic lesions in the alternative pathway conferred dependence on NIK, a kinase that mediates signaling downstream of the TRAF2/3-BIRC2/3 complex. Thus, NIK represents a novel therapeutic target for MCL treatment, particularly for tumors refractory to BCR pathway inhibitors. Collectively, these findings reveal a pattern of mutually exclusive activation of the CBM-NFκB or alternative NIK-NFκB pathways in MCL and provide critical insights into patient stratification strategies for NFκB-pathway targeted agents.

  Study EGAS00001000622

• Analysis of RAD51C promoter methylation using targeted bisulfite sequencing (amplicon sequencing) in ovarian cancer pre-clinical models and patient samples.

  In high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC), deleterious mutations in the DNA repair gene RAD51C are established drivers of defective homologous recombination and are emerging biomarkers of PARP inhibitor (PARPi) sensitivity. RAD51C promoter methylation (meRAD51C) is detected at similar frequencies to mutations, yet its effects on PARPi responses remain unresolved. In this study, three HGSC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models with methylation at most or all examined CpG sites in the RAD51C promoter show responses to PARPi. Both complete and heterogeneous methylation patterns were associated with RAD51C gene silencing and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). PDX models lost meRAD51C following treatment with PARPi rucaparib or niraparib, where a single unmethylated copy of RAD51C was sufficient to drive PARPi resistance. Genomic copy number profiling of one of the PDX models using SNP arrays revealed that this resistance was acquired independently in two genetically distinct lineages. In a cohort of 11 patients with RAD51C-methylated HGSC, various patterns of meRAD51C were associated with genomic 'scarring', indicative of HRD history, but exhibited no clear correlations with clinical outcome. Differences in methylation stability under treatment pressure were also observed between patients, where one HGSC was found to maintain meRAD51C after 6 lines of therapy (4 platinum-based), whilst another HGSC sample was found to have heterozygous meRAD51C and elevated RAD51C gene expression (relative to homozygous meRAD51C controls) after only neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. As meRAD51C loss in a single gene copy was sufficient to cause PARPi resistance in PDX, methylation zygosity should be carefully assessed in previously treated patients when considering PARPi therapy.

  Study EGAS00001005395

• Pathology and tumor biology DAC

  Dac EGAC00001003221

• CDH Asian Head and Neck Angiosarcoma

  Dac EGAC00001003145

• Relapsed and Primary Neuroblastoma DAC

  Dac EGAC00001000373

• Illumina - Population and Medical Genomics Group

  Dac EGAC00001000686

• ICR_Evolutionary Genomics and Modelling

  Dac EGAC00001001050

• RNAseq intra- and extracranial ECs DAC

  Dac EGAC00001001622

• Gene expression and Cancer

  Dac EGAC00001001772

• Neuroblastoma and cell migration DAC

  Dac EGAC00001001965

• Genome-wide data Resande and Swedes

  Dac EGAC00001002627

• INSERM U944 Team Genome and Cancer

  Dac EGAC00001002976

• Phase II Therapeutic Trial of Mexiletine in Non-Dystrophic Myotonia (IND #77,021)

  Non-dystrophic myotonias are a group of rare muscle disorders caused by abnormalities in different muscle cell membrane proteins. Patients experience delayed muscle relaxation that causes impaired physical activity, stiffness, and pain. Mexiletine has been shown to be beneficial for symptoms of myotonia in case reports of patients with non-dystrophic myotonia, however, current management of these patients primarily depends on individual practitioners&#39; preference. This study is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over treatment trial using mexiletine in non-dystrophic myotonias. The results, if positive, will permit the identification of mexiletine as an effective therapy for myotonia, making it a first-line therapy for patients with non-dystrophic myotonia. The specific aim of this proposal is to perform a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study to assess whether mexiletine improves both quantitative and qualitative measures of myotonia in patients with non-dystrophic myotonia. Given the rarity of non-dystrophic myotonia, large randomized controlled treatment trials in these disorders have not been feasible in the past. Primary Outcome Measure: Patient-assessed symptom: stiffness as measured by an Interactive Voice Response Diary (IVR). Secondary Outcome Measures: a) patient-assessed pain, weakness, and fatigue as measured by IVR; b) clinical myotonia assessment; c) quality of life as measured by INQoL, SF36; d) a quantitative measure of grip myotonia; e) measurement of CMAP after short and long exercise; f) grading of myotonia on needle EMG.

  Study phs001311

• Cell-Free, Methylated DNA in Blood Samples Reveals Tissue-Specific, Cellular Damage from Radiation Treatment

  Radiation therapy is an effective cancer treatment, although damage to surrounding healthy tissues can also occur. Cell-type specific DNA methylation patterns can be used to decode the cellular origins of cell-free DNA fragments, allowing for minimally-invasive monitoring of tissue damage. To evaluate whether changes in cell-free DNA methylation can indicate damages to tissues in patients treated with radiation, we collected serum samples from 15 breast cancer patients at three timepoints during their standard-of-care radiation therapy after surgery. A baseline sample was taken for each patient before onset of radiation therapy and a second End-Of-Treatment (EOT) sample was taken 30 minutes after the last treatment fraction. Finally, a recovery sample was taken one month after completion of radiation therapy. From serum samples, cell-free DNA was isolated and bisulfite capture-sequencing DNA methylation data were generated. Bisulfite capture-sequencing DNA methylation data were also generated from buffy coat and tissue-specific endothelial gDNA samples as well as from serum/plasma samples of healthy controls. The analysis of serum samples from breast cancer patients undergoing radiation treatment revealed distinct tissue-specific epithelial and endothelial responses to radiation across multiple organs. In conclusion, as a proof of concept we show that cell-type specific methylation signatures can be applied to detect cellular injury from radiation treatment using minimally invasive cell-free DNA in blood samples.

  Study phs003290

• Noninvasive prenatal molecular karyotyping from maternal plasma

  Fetal DNA is present in the plasma of pregnant women. Massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA has been used to detect fetal trisomies 21, 18, 13 and selected sex chromosomal aneuploidies noninvasively. Case reports describing the detection of fetal microdeletions from maternal plasma using massively parallel sequencing have been reported. However, these previous reports were either polymorphism-dependent or used statistical analyses which were confined to one or a small number of selected parts of the genome. In this report, we reported a procedure for performing noninvasive prenatal karyotyping at 3 Mb resolution across the whole genome through the massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNA. This method has been used to analyze the plasma obtained from 6 cases. In 5 cases, fetal microduplications or microdeletions have been detected successfully from maternal plasma. The two cases with fetal microduplications represented the first noninvasive prenatal detection of such changes from maternal plasma. In the remaining case, the plasma DNA sequencing result was consistent with the pregnant mother being a carrier of a microduplication. Simulation analyses were performed for determining the number of plasma DNA molecules that would need to be sequenced and aligned for enhancing the diagnostic resolution of noninvasive prenatal karyotyping to 2 Mb and 1 Mb. In conclusion, noninvasive prenatal molecular karyotyping from maternal plasma by massively parallel sequencing is feasible and would enhance the diagnostic spectrum of noninvasive prenatal testing.

  Study EGAS00001000439

• Bibliography Statistics

  EGA Statistics Bibliography Growth Community Archive Distribution Catalogue Here we expose in a yearly and cumulative manner, the publications, citations, publishers journals and impact factor of EGA related studies. Publications citing data stored at the EGA The studies that use EGA datasets are requested to cite the EGA into their bibliography. This fact allows for a faster spreading of the role and purpose of the EGA, being the availability of their studies for testability and reusability purposes. In order to track the studies we use the unique study accession, provided by the EGA when submitting a new study, and comprised of the keyword EGAS followed by 11 digits such as EGAS00000000001. We use the Europe PMC RESTful Web Service in order to query, and index studies where the EGAS accession was used. Below, you can find a chart showing the journal publishers of the studies citing data stored in the EGA being cited: Publications Citing Data Stored in the EGA pieChart('publishers-citations', 'https://stats.ega-archive.org/publishers/citations', 'Publishers') Number of publications citing data stored in the EGA by year Here, you can find a chart showing the number of publications citing data stored in the EGA by year. These publications could have deposit, or re-used the data. The study acession can be found in the publication. The default values are non-cumulative. You can see cumulative values by clicking "Cumulative". Number of Publications Citing Data Stored in the EGA by Year barChart('publications-by-year', 'https://stats.ega-archive.org/publications/year', ['Number of Publications by Year', 'Publications by Year']) Journal Impact Factor of Publications Citing Data Stored in the EGA Here, you can find a chart showing the journal impact factor of publications citing data stored in the EGA. We have used Scimago Journal Rank for this purpose. Low impact treshold was defined between 0.0 and 5.0 excluding; Medium impact treshold was defined between 5.0 and 10.0 excluding; High impact range was established from values equal to or higher than 10.0; Journal Impact Factor of Publications Citing Data Stored in the EGA pieChart('citations-publication-impact-factor', 'https://stats.ega-archive.org/citations/publication/impact/factor', 'Publication Impact Factor') Publications citing a publication containing a EGA study accession The publications, stating a EGA study accession in the bibliography, can be cited for testibility or reusability purposes. Below, you can find a chart showing the publishers of the publications being cited: Publications Citing a Publication Containing a EGA Study Accession pieChart('publications-citations', 'https://stats.ega-archive.org/publications/citations', 'Publishers') Number of publications citing a publication containing a EGA study accession by year Here, you can find a chart showing the number of publications citing a publication containing a EGA study accession by year by year. The values are non-cumulative: Number of published citations by year barChart('citations-year', 'https://stats.ega-archive.org/citations/year', ['Number of Publications', 'Citations by Year'])

  Documentation about/statistics/bibliography

• Assessing mitochondrial bioenergetics in coronary artery disease: A translational left ventricular tissue study in humans (The AMBITION study).

  Severe or recurrent myocardial ischemia can lead to long-term left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In this study, we assessed for chronic metabolomic and transcriptomic adaptations within LV myocardium of patients with evidence of preoperative inducible ischemia undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). During surgery, paired transmural LV biopsies were acquired on the beating heart from a region of inducible ischemia (determined by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance), and a remote LV segment. From 33 patients, 63 LV biopsies were acquired on the beating heart during CABG, comparing to analysis of LV samples from 11 donor hearts. The global myocardial ATP/ADP ratio was reduced in CAD patients as compared to donor LV tissue with increased expression of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes encoding the electron transport chain complexes across multiple cell types. Paired analyses of biopsies obtained during CABG from LV segments with or without inducible ischemia revealed no significant difference in the ATP/ADP ratio, broader metabolic profile or expression of ventricular cardiomyocyte genes implicated in OXPHOS. Finally, differential metabolite analysis suggested dysregulation of several intermediates in patients with impaired LVEF; this notably included the tricyclic acid cycle metabolite, succinate. Overall, our results suggest that viable human myocardium in patients with stable CAD has global alterations in bioenergetic and transcriptional profile without large regional differences between areas with or without inducible ischemia.

  Study EGAS00001007351

• Neoadjuvant combination PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 blockade in patients with cisplatin-ineligible operable urothelial carcinoma

  Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) is being tested in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with localized urothelial carcinoma (UC), with one study reporting data in cisplatin-ineligible patients who received anti PD-L1 monotherapy. The study reported that patients with bulky tumors, a known high-risk feature defined as greater than clinical T2 disease, had fewer responses, with pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 17%. Here, we report on the first pilot combination neoadjuvant trial (NCT02812420) with anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) plus anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) in cisplatin-ineligible patients, with all tumors identified as having high risk features (N=28). Primary endpoint was safety and we observed 6 of 28 patients (21%) with grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events, consisting of asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities (N=4), hepatitis and colitis (N=2). We also observed pCR of 37.5% and downstaging to pT1 or less in 58% of patients who completed surgery (N=24). In summary, we provide initial safety, efficacy and biomarker data with neoadjuvant combination anti-PD-L1 plus anti-CTLA-4, which warrants further development for patients with localized UC, especially cisplatin-ineligible patients with high-risk features who do not currently have an established standard-of-care neoadjuvant treatment. Publication: Gao et al. Neoadjuvant PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 blockade in patients with cisplatin-ineligible operable high-risk urothelial carcinoma. Nature Medicine volume 26, pages1845–1851(2020)

  Study EGAS00001004074