12160 results for "fc 26 coins pc Visit Buyfc26coins.com for latest FC 26 coins news..z7ux"

in 44.26 milliseconds.

• Dataset for bone_cancer-WHOLE_GENOME

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 48 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008866

• Dataset for breast_cancer-EXON

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 94 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008868

• Dataset for cancer_of_unknown_primary-EXON

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 62 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008870

• Dataset for colorectal_cancer-EXON

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 119 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008871

• Dataset for GIST-EXON

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 64 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008875

• Dataset for GIST-WHOLE_GENOME

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 18 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008876

• Dataset for gynecologic_cancer-WHOLE_GENOME

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 38 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008878

• Dataset for head_and_neck_cancer-WHOLE_GENOME

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 56 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008879

• Dataset for liposarcoma-WHOLE_GENOME

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 48 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008888

• Dataset for melanoma-EXON

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 76 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008890

• Dataset for NSCLC-WHOLE_GENOME

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 34 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008894

• RNAseq data

  Bulk RNAseq of sigmoid colon biopsies from healthy volunteers and ulcerative colitis patients. Subjects were treated with Placebo or IL-22Fc at different doses, and biopsies were collected at day 0 and day 30 post treatment and prepared for RNA sequencing.

  Dataset EGAD00001008816

• Fecal 16S UC sequencing data

  Fecal 16S-V4 rRNA gene sequence data from NCT02749630 ulcerative colitis patients. Stool samples were collected at screening as well as on days 29, 43, 64, 85, and 134 processed for 16SV4 rRNA gene sequencing

  Dataset EGAD00001008818

• Fecal 16S HV sequencing data

  Fecal 16S-V4 rRNA gene sequence data from NCT02749630 healthy volunteers. Stool samples were collected at screening as well as on days 29, 43, 64, 85, and 134 processed for 16SV4 rRNA gene sequencing

  Dataset EGAD00001008840

• Fecal WMS HV sequencing data

  Fecal WMS data from NCT02749630 healthy volunteers. Stool samples were collected at screening as well as on days 29, 43, and 64 and prepared for whole metagenomic sequencing.

  Dataset EGAD00001008841

• Dataset for breast_cancer-RNA

  Rare cancer sequencing data of 59 runs in tumor/control pairs, which were uploaded to umbrella studies. The sequencing was always paired

  Dataset EGAD00001008850

• Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction

  We applied an integrative single-cell genomics strategy with single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) and single nucleus Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin sequencing (snATAC-seq) together with spatial transcriptomics from the same tissue mapping human cardiac cells in homeostasis and after myocardial infarction (MI) at unprecedented spatial and molecular resolution. We profiled in total 31 samples from 23 patients including four non-transplanted donor hearts as controls and samples from tissues with necrotic tissue areas (ischemic zone, IZ), border zone (BZ), and the non-affected left ventricular myocardium (remote zone, RZ) of patients with acute MI.

  Dataset EGAD00001008952

• cfMethyl-Seq

  cfMethyl-Seq libraries were generated for 479 cfDNA samples and were sequenced with 150 bp paired-end reads.

  Dataset EGAD00001009003

• Garvan/St Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Tissue and Data

  The cohort (n=53) consists of prostate cancer patients from Australia. For each patient, a pair of blood and tumour samples were collected. The sequencing data was mapped to hg38 reference. Blood BAMs are named with “-B” as suffix and tumour BAMs are named with “-T” as suffix.

  Dataset EGAD00001009066

• Single nuclei RNA-Seq from 5 regions of the human fetal brain

  Data generated through single nuclei RNA sequencing on 5 regions of the brain (frontal cortex, ganglionic eminence, hippocampus, thalamus and cerebellum) from 3 fetuses (two of 14 and one of 15 post-conception weeks, all female). Tissue was acquired from the MRC-Wellcome Trust Human Developmental Biology Resource (HDBR) with ethical approval. snRNA-seq libraries were prepared from ∼10,000 nuclei from each sample using Chromium Single Cell 3ʹ (v3) reagents (10X Genomics). Quality control of libraries was performed using the Agilent 5200 Fragment Analyzer before sequencing on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to a depth of at least 865 million (median = 1.01 billion) read pairs per library. Raw sequencing data were converted into FASTQ files. For a full description of data generation, please see Cameron et al, Biological Psychiatry 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.06.033.

  Dataset EGAD00001009303

• Roche Alzheimer's dataset

  The Roche Alzheimer’s disease dataset (Roche_AD) consists of 80 samples from 40 unique individuals (one sample from the temporal cortex and one from deep white matter for each individual, 12 cases, 25 controls, 3 dementia). A total of 12,000 estimated cells from each sample were loaded on the 10x Single Cell Next GEM G Chip. cDNA libraries were prepared using the Chromium Single Cell 3’ Library and Gel Bead v3 kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA libraries were sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 System and NovaSeq 6000 S2 Reagent Kit v1.5 (100 cycles), aiming at a sequencing depth of minimum 30K reads/nucleus.

  Dataset EGAD00001009166

• Ither2 WXS dataset - Implementation of pediatric precision oncology into clinical practice: The individualized Therapies for Children with cancer program “iTHER”

  iTHER is a prospective national precision oncology program aiming to define tumor molecular profiles in children and adolescents with primary very high-risk, relapsed, or refractory pediatric tumors in order to identify relevant aberrations to inform treatment.

  Dataset EGAD00001010178

• Ither2 RNA-Seq dataset - Implementation of pediatric precision oncology into clinical practice: The individualized Therapies for Children with cancer program “iTHER”

  iTHER is a prospective national precision oncology program aiming to define tumor molecular profiles in children and adolescents with primary very high-risk, relapsed, or refractory pediatric tumors in order to identify relevant aberrations to inform treatment.

  Dataset EGAD00001010179

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0168_003

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0168_003 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_3

  Dataset EGAD00001010205

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0170_003

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0170_003 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_5

  Dataset EGAD00001010207

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0167_003

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0167_003 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_2

  Dataset EGAD00001010204

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0169_003

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0169_003 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_4

  Dataset EGAD00001010206

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0171_003A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0171_003A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_6

  Dataset EGAD00001010208

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0178_003A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0178_003A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_8

  Dataset EGAD00001010209

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0187_003A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0187_003A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_10

  Dataset EGAD00001010211

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0188_003A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0188_003A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_11

  Dataset EGAD00001010212

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0197_003A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0197_003A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_12

  Dataset EGAD00001010213

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0198_003A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0198_003A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Cont_13

  Dataset EGAD00001010214

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0167_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0167_001 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR2_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010215

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0168_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0168_001 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR3_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010216

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0169_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0169_001 for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR4_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010217

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0170_001A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0170_001A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR5_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010218

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0171_001A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0171_001A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Pair_6_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010219

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0178_001A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0178_001A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR8_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010220

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0183_001A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0183_001A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR9_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010221

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0188_001A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0188_001A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR11_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010223

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0197_001A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0197_001A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR12_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010224

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0198_001A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0198_001A for Follicular lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Pair_13_FL

  Dataset EGAD00001010225

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0167_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0167_002 for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR2_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010226

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0168_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0168_002 for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR3_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010227

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0169_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0169_002 for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR4_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010228

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0170_002A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0170_002A for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR5_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010229

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0171_002A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0171_002A for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Pair_6_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010230

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0178_002A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0178_002A for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR8_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010231

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0183_002A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0183_002A for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRI_Pair_9_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010232

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0187_002A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0187_002A for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR10_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010233

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0188_002A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0188_002A for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR11_DLBCL

  Dataset EGAD00001010234

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0197_002A

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_CS_CHIP0197_002A for Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patient sample TFRIPAIR12_DLBCL_rel

  Dataset EGAD00001010235

• Organoid Derivation Project - GRCh38 - WGS (2023-06-22)

  Sequencing of tissue samples and their derived organoids from oesophageal, pancreatic and colorectal cancer patients. . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2023-06-22.

  Dataset EGAD00001011093

• Single-cell RNA sequencing of SarBC-01 treated with Dexamethasone vs DMSO, with or without Matrigel.

  This dataset contains raw FASTQ files from single cell RNA sequencing of SarBC-01 cells treated with Dexamethasone vs DMSO, with or without Matrigel, processed with MULTI-seq. Cells from 4 different culture conditions (+Mat/Dex, +Mat/DMSO, -Mat/Dex, -Mat/DMSO) were harvested, processed for multiplexing using the MULTI-seq protocol and loaded in a Chromium Single Cell 3ʹ GEM Library and Gel Bead Kit v3 (10x Genomics). Gene expression (cDNA) and MULTI-seq libraries were prepared according to the manufacturers’ protocol of Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3’ reagents Kits v3.1 (Dual Index). Finally, cDNA and MULTI-seq libraries were analyzed using an Agilent Bioanalyzer (DNA High Sensitivity kit) and sequenced on a NovaSeq6000 (S2 flow cell) platform. MULTISEQ BARCODES: TTAGCCAG => Matrigel/DMSO CCACAATG => Matrigel/Dexamethasone GCACACGC => noMatrigel/DMSO AGAGAGAG => noMatrigel/Dexamethasone

  Dataset EGAD00001011155

• INSPIRE multi-timepoint cfMeDIP dataset

  This dataset contains raw sequencing data from multi-timepoint cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) of plasma samples from the INSPIRE study (NCT02644369). Details about the study, including inclusion/exclusion criteria and interventions are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02644369. Briefly, five cohorts were included, INS-A (head & neck squamous cell carcinoma), INS-B (triple-negative breast cancer), INS-C (high-grade serous ovarian cancer), INS-D (melanoma), and INS-E (mixed solid tumors). All patients in the study were diagnosed with advanced cancer and received treatment with pembrolizumab. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and every 3 cycles until disease progression, death, loss of follow-up, or completion of the study. Plasma samples were first processed for cell-free DNA mutations and remaining samples were then processed by cfMeDIP-seq, prioritizing baseline and post-cycle 3 samples. In total, data from 204 timepoints from 87 distinct patients are deposited.

  Dataset EGAD00001011312

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X5XB03231

  Dataset EGAD00001011213

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library TENX069

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library TENX069 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X4XB03083

  Dataset EGAD00001011211

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0150_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X5XB03230

  Dataset EGAD00001011212

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0063_000

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0063_000 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X3XB01584

  Dataset EGAD00001011209

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library TENX068

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library TENX068 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X4XB03080

  Dataset EGAD00001011210

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X5XB03223

  Dataset EGAD00001011214

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X6XB03401

  Dataset EGAD00001011215

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0152_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X6XB03404

  Dataset EGAD00001011216

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X6XB03447

  Dataset EGAD00001011217

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X7XB03510

  Dataset EGAD00001011218

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0163_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA609X7XB03505

  Dataset EGAD00001011219

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0172_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA609X7XB03554

  Dataset EGAD00001011220

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0148_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0148_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X4XB02498

  Dataset EGAD00001011221

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library TENX048

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library TENX048 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X5XB02895

  Dataset EGAD00001011222

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_006

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_006 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X6XB03099

  Dataset EGAD00001011223

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0175_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0175_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X6XB03101

  Dataset EGAD00001011224

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X7XB03304

  Dataset EGAD00001011225

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X7XB03448

  Dataset EGAD00001011226

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X7XB03305

  Dataset EGAD00001011227

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_004

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0146_004 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X7XB03305

  Dataset EGAD00001011228

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0189_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X8XB03663

  Dataset EGAD00001011229

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0182_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X8XB03431

  Dataset EGAD00001011230

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0184_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X8XB03434

  Dataset EGAD00001011231

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X9XB03617

  Dataset EGAD00001011232

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0173_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X9XB03616

  Dataset EGAD00001011233

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0195_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0195_001 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X8XB03664

  Dataset EGAD00001011234

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X10XB03696

  Dataset EGAD00001011235

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0206_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA535X10XB03693

  Dataset EGAD00001011236

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0208_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0208_002 for Triple negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft SA535X9XB03776

  Dataset EGAD00001011237

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0142_002

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0142_002 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X4XB02879

  Dataset EGAD00001011238

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0071_000

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0071_000 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X5XB03015

  Dataset EGAD00001011239

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0076_000

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0076_000 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X5XB03021

  Dataset EGAD00001011240

• 10x Single Cell Gene Expression Library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0079_001

  10x Single Cell Gene Expression library SCRNA10X_SA_CHIP0079_001 for Triple negative breast cancer sample SA1035X6XB03216

  Dataset EGAD00001011241

• The G2 gene expression signature and MYC overexpression are independent poor prognostic factors in childhood high-grade osteosarcoma

  Key objective Are the prognostic transcriptomic G1/G2 gene expression signature, MYC overexpression, and MYC amplification replicable stratifying biomarkers for future clinical trials in high-grade osteosarcoma? Knowledge gathered In an unselected cohort, the G2 gene expression signature and MYC overexpression, but not MYC amplification, were independently associated with poor event-free and overall survival. Relevance Transcriptomic biomarkers may serve as stratifying factors that guide the management of patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. Current data underlines the importance of prospective validation of the G1/G2 signature and MYC overexpression in an international, multicenter, study.

  Dataset EGAD00001015502

• Single-cell RNA-sequencing of rhabdomyosarcoma tumour tissue (2025-09-30)

  This study investigates high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) using multiple single-cell and spatial genomic technologies. We generated and analysed single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing, chromatin accessibility, and spatial transcriptomics data from primary tumours and validation samples. These datasets characterise cellular diversity within rhabdomyosarcoma and identify cell states associated with aggressive disease. The data support research into tumour biology, risk stratification, and therapeutic target discovery. This repository houses the single-cell RNA sequencing of RMS tumours data. . This dataset contains all the data available for this study on 2025-09-30.

  Dataset EGAD00001015713

• High-Risk Breast Cancer GWAS

  The GWAS includes High Risk Women from the following epidemiological studies of breast cancer, comprising a total of 3,719 cases and 3,642 controls (cases/controls: MEC, 0/200; ABCFR, 326/418; FCCC, 56/3; BCFR-UT, 66/32; CNIO-BC, 87/92; GESBC, 65/0; LIFE, 164/0; MARIE, 41/105; MAYO, 208/210; MNYR, 293/409; MSKCC, 310/0; NC-BCFR, 234/233; OFBCR, 553/560; POSH, 377/0; HBOC, 47/47; BBCS, 612/1333; UPENN, 280/0 This study was funded by a grant CA165038 to Christopher Haiman (University of Southern California) and John Hopper (University of Melbourne) from the National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health. The contributing studies: Multiethnic Cohort (MEC). This study was supported by grant UM1 CA164973 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health. Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry, the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry Cohort (OFBCR). This study was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. Utah Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR-UT). This study was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (MNYR). This study was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. Northern California site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (NC-BCFR). This study was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry (ABCFR). This study was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Study (CNIO-BC). This study has been partially funded by The Spanish Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER) and the Spanish National Genotyping Center (CEGEN). Genetic Epidemiologic Study of Breast Cancer (GESBC). The GESBC was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e. V. [70492] and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). Mammary Carcinoma Risk Factor Study (MARIE). This study was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. [70-2892-BR I, 106332, 108253, 108419], the Hamburg Cancer Society, the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany [01KH0402]. Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH). Funding for the POSH study was provided by Cancer Research UK (grant refs A7572, A11699, C22524), the Breast Cancer Campaign (grant number: 2013MayPR044) and from 2003-2006 by a grant from The Wessex Cancer Trust. Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH). Funding for the POSH study was provided by Cancer Research UK (grant refs A7572, A11699, C22524), the Breast Cancer Campaign (grant number: 2013MayPR044) and from 2003-2006 by a grant from The Wessex Cancer Trust. Hereditary Breast and ovarian Cancer: Genetic and Molecular Studies (HBOC). This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grant CA58860 and The Lon V Smith Foundation: LVSF-44528. Mayo Clinic inherited breast and ovarian cancer study (MAYO). This study was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, NIH grants CA192393, CA176785, and an NIH CA116201 Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer. British Breast Cancer Study (BBCS); Mammographic oestrogens and growth factor study (MOG). The BBCS and the MOG study are funded by Cancer Research UK and Breakthrough Breast Cancer and acknowledge NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN). Genotyping of non-BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (UPENN). The study is supported by the Basser Research Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Rooney Family Foundation, NIH grants CA176785 and CA192393, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the Susan G. Komen Foundation for the Cure and Macdonald Family Foundation. Clinical Significance of Germline BRCA Mutations (MSKCC). The study is supported by the Robert and Kate Niehaus Clinical Cancer Genetics Research Initiative, The Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute 5P30 CA08748-40. Women's Learning the Influence of Family and Environment (LIFE). This study was supported by grants CA17054 and CA74847 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, No. 4PB-0092 from the California Breast Cancer Research Program of the University of California. Philadelphia site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry at Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC). This study is supported by NIH grant CA164920.

  Study phs000929

• A Prospective Natural History Study of Diagnosis, Treatment and Outcomes of Children with SCID Disorders

  Individuals with a recent or new diagnosis of severe combined immune deficiency (including infants who were identified by newborn screening) may be eligible to be enrolled on the PIDTC research study 6901. Speak to your doctor to determine if you or your child may be eligible. Protocol 6901 follows patients with SCID prospectively, meaning the 6901 study enrolls participants where there is a plan to receive a blood and marrow transplant, enzyme therapy, or gene therapy in the future. Patients are then followed according to a schedule set out by the study protocol after the procedure. The times the study requests follow up will be the same as when your doctor would want to be seeing you or your child as part of their regular ongoing medical care. Patients with "leaky SCID", reticular dysgenesis, and Omenn syndrome may also be eligible to participate in 6901. The 6901 research study does NOT dictate how your or your child's doctors should treat you or your child, as the PIDTC recognizes that there are many complex factors that go into this decision. The decision about how you or your child with SCID will be treated is made by your doctor. The 6901 study simply follows how you or your child do over time. There are no experimental therapies on this study. The 6901 study has been open since August 2010, and continues to be open and enrolling patients to the present day. The study plans to enroll approximately 250 patients with SCID. By studying new patients undergoing treatment for SCID, the goal is to learn more about: (1) outcomes from the treatment of SCID in the modern era of medicine, (2) what factors lead to the best long-term outcomes, such as best donor, conditioning regimen, timing of transplant, etc. and (3) what impact newborn screening and the early diagnosis of SCID has had on the long-term outcomes following BMT or gene therapy. A significant amount of information is also being gathered on how and when the immune system recovers after BMT, quality of life for long-term survivors, and about whether children develop normally after treatment. The 6901 study is the largest coordinated prospective study of patients with SCID ever performed. Information that we will learn, both now and in the future, will help doctors and other health professionals to better treat children with SCID. All hospitals within the PIDTC are enrolling patients with SCID on 6901, ensuring that the outcomes are reflective of what happens in the "real world" as opposed to at just one or two large centers.

  Study phs001392

• Determination of Cross-Reactive Immunological Material (CRIM) status and longitudinal follow-up of individuals with Pompe disease

  Infantile-onset Pompe disease is an inherited disorder that is normally diagnosed within the first months of life. It is caused by lack of or defect in an enzyme (a special protein that carries out normal chemical reactions within the body) called acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA). GAA normally breaks down glycogen (stored sugar) in lysosomes (the part of the cell that digests food and other chemicals). Pompe disease is one of many lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs). LSDs are diseases caused by the malfunction of the lysosome or one of their digestive enzymes. Patients with Pompe disease cannot break down lysosomal glycogen. This causes glycogen to build up and damage cells throughout the body, especially in the heart and muscles. Current treatment for Pompe disease involves enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). In this treatment, the drug alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme) is put into your blood. The drug provides a form of the GAA enzyme to replace the enzyme that is missing or not working properly in the patient's blood. This treatment has allowed babies to live longer and achieve developmental milestones. In this study, researchers will learn about the patient's ability to tolerate ERT. Cross-Reactive Immunological Material (CRIM) is a measurement of natural GAA production. A patient's CRIM status (either positive or negative) is an important factor that affects how he or she responds to ERT with Myozyme. Children who produce some natural GAA are classified as CRIM+, while children who do not produce any natural GAA are classified as CRIM-. Children who are CRIM+ generally tolerate ERT well. But, children who are CRIM-, and some children classified as CRIM+, have a poor response to ERT. Patients who have a poor response to ERT have complications because their body sees Myozyme as "foreign" and triggers an immune response to try to remove it from the body. Treatments are currently being developed to stop this immune response and prevent complications from ERT. We will enroll patients with Infantile Pompe disease in this longitudinal natural history (observational) study. The specific aims of this study are: To determine and correlate Cross-Reactive Immunological Material (CRIM) status with the GAA gene mutations found on these patients To validate an approach for determining CRIM status from whole blood sample, with the gold standard determination of CRIM status by skin fibroblasts and mutation analysis To explore the clinical treatment response and natural history of CRIM-positive and CRIM-negative Pompe disease patients with and without immune modulation To investigate the role of immune response to treatment

  Study phs001555

• Disorders/Differences of Sex Development (DSD) Study Performed at UCLA in Collaboration with the DSD-Translational Research Network (DSD-TRN), with the Support of the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Program

  The Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Program (Kids First) is a trans-NIH effort initiated in response to the 2014 Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Act and supported by the NIH Common Fund. This program focuses on gene discovery in pediatric cancers and structural birth defects and the development of the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Data Resource (Kids First Data Resource). Both childhood cancers and structural birth defects are critical and costly conditions associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Elucidating the underlying genetic etiology of these diseases has the potential to profoundly improve preventative measures, diagnostics, and therapeutic interventions. Whole Genome Sequence (WGS) and phenotypic data from this study are accessible through dbGaP and kidsfirstdrc.org, where other Kids First datasets can also be accessed. Disorders/Differences of Sex Development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex is atypical. DSD are chronic medical conditions collectively affecting ~1% of the population, frequently requiring life-long care by multiple specialists, and carrying a significant public health burden. Some are associated with life-threatening events, such as adrenal crises in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH). DSD are also associated with increased infertility, cancer, gender dysphoria risks, psychosocial distress and pervasive challenges to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients and families. DSD are broadly classified into three categories: sex chromosome DSD, 46,XY DSD and 46,XX DSD, and further classified according to the type of gonad found in the patient (ovary, testis, ovotestis). We were able to increase significantly the diagnostic success for DSD using Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), with the identification of disease-causing and likely pathogenic variants in a third of a cohort of 46,XY patients. We have therefore proposed a shift in the diagnostic approach to DSD to use next-gen sequencing as a first-line clinical test, which could lead to faster and more accurate diagnosis, and orient further clinical management, limiting unnecessary, costly, and often invasive endocrine testing and imaging. However many remain unexplained (over half of the XY cases, a significant minority of XX cases, including most ovotesticular DSD, and most syndromic cases). In addition, the very large phenotypic variability in cases with known variants in the same gene is unexplained. We here propose to use Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS), which dramatically improves upon exome sequencing, covering both coding and non-coding parts of the genome more uniformly, as an approach to not only improve diagnostic yield, but also to identify novel genes and regulatory elements involved in DSD.

  Study phs001178

• New England-Based Case-Control Study of Ovarian Cancer

  The case-control data provided to dbGaP were collected under NCI grant number CA54419 which had 3 enrollment phases: I (1992-1997), II (1998-2002) and III (2003-2008). Altogether, CA54419 funded 15 years of data and specimen collection, resulting in one of the longest running population based case-control studies of ovarian cancer. The study goal was to examine reproductive factors, lifestyle exposures, and genetic background in relation to ovarian cancer risk. The project recruited cases from Eastern Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and became known as the New England-based Case-Control study (NECC) of ovarian cancer. 3957 ovarian cancer cases diagnosed at ages 18-80 and residing in Eastern Massachusetts and New Hampshire were identified through tumor boards and registries. Of these, 3083 (78%) were eligible and among those eligible, 2203 (71%) were enrolled. After excluding 127 non-epithelial and 35 mixed mesodermal tumors, 2041 cases with epithelial tumors of ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube origin, including borderline malignancies were included. On average, cases were interviewed 10 months after their diagnosis. A pathologist reviewed pathology reports and recorded histologic subtype, grade, and stage. Mixed ovarian cancers described as predominantly one type were classified as that type. Undifferentiated, transitional cell tumors, or mixed serous/transitional cell tumors were counted as serous. Other mixed epithelial, malignant Brenner, and unspecified epithelial tumors were classified as other. 2100 controls were identified through random digit dialing (RDD), driver-license lists, and town-resident lists. During the first funding phase from 1992 to 1997, 420 (72%) controls identified through RDD and 102 (51%) through town-resident lists agreed to participate. From 1998 to 2008, only town-resident lists were used to identify potential controls. 4366 controls were identified, of whom 1426 (33%) were ineligible if they had died, moved, or were seriously ill or if they did not have a working telephone, speak English, or have at least one ovary. Of eligible controls, 1362 (46%) declined to participate by phone or via 'opt-out' postcard and 1578 (54%) were enrolled. Controls were frequency matched to cases by 5-year age groups and region of residence. In all phases, after written informed consent, demographic information, reproductive and medical history, and habits were assessed by in-person or telephone interview (in a few instances). All of the questions were framed with respect to a reference date defined as 1 year before the diagnosis date for women in the case group and the date of interview for those in the control group. This study was approved by institutional review boards at Dana Farber Harvard Cancer Center and Dartmouth Medical Center.

  Study phs001034

• The Role of CDX2 in Controlling ABCB1 Expression and Chemosensitivity in Human Colon Cancer

  This study reports the results of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) experiments performed on two human colon cancer cell lines (HT-29, DLD-1) that were genetically engineered to achieve either the constitutive expression (in HT-29 cells) or the selective inactivation (in DLD-1 cells) of the transcription factor CDX2, a master regulator of embryonic gut development and a key regulator of multi-lineage differentiation in adult colon epithelial cells. Our previous studies had identified lack of CDX2 expression as a prognostic biomarker of poor prognosis and a predictive biomarker of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage-II and Stage-III colon cancer patients (Dalerba et al., NEJM, 374:211-222, 2016; PMID: 26789870). The molecular basis of these associations, however, remained poorly understood. The present study was designed to identify which genes are under the transcriptional control of CDX2, in order to clarify their role in shaping colon cancer resistance to chemotherapy. Of the two lines included in this study, the first (HT-29) is CDX2-negative at baseline, and was infected with a lentivirus vector encoding for the cDNA of the human CDX2 gene under the control of a constitutive promoter (CMV). The second line (DLD-1) is CDX2-positive at baseline, and was infected with a series of lentivirus vectors encoding for CRISPR/Cas9 constructs designed to selectively inactivate the CDX2 gene. In both cases, infected cells were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), based on the differential expression of a green fluorescent reporter (EGFP) that was also encoded by the lentivirus vectors, and transcribed in tandem with either the CDX2 cDNA (HT-29) or CRISPR/Cas9 gRNAs targeting CDX2 (DLD-1). The experiments were designed to include 3 experimental replicates per condition, and to compare the transcriptional profile of genetically engineered cells with that of autologous controls (i.e., HT-29 cells infected with an "empty" version of the same lentivirus vector used to over-express CDX2, DLD-1 cells engineered with a "non-targeting" CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA). In the specific case of DLD-1 cells engineered with CRIPSR-Cas9 constructs targeting CDX2, infected cells were sorted based on the differential expression of EGFP and then plated as single-cells, in order to sub-culture three isogenic clones, all of which were genetically sequenced to confirm bi-allelic knock-out of the CDX2 gene, and confirmed to lack CDX2 protein expression by Western blot. The results of our experiments demonstrate that, in human colon epithelial cells, CDX2 controls the expression of the ABCB1 efflux pump, by positively regulating the transcription of the corresponding gene.

  Study phs002903

• A Clone's Genomic Stability as a Biomarker of Its DNA-Damage Resilience

  A main problem in the treatment of advanced cancers, including gastric cancers and glioblastoma, is the incertitude at which we predict how individual patients will respond to DNA-damaging agents, especially on the long run. Knowing the mechanism behind a patient's response, or the lack thereof, will help us depart from the oversimplified “more-is-better” and “one-size-fits-all” principles according to which DNA-damaging agents are administered. This will improve clinical outcome by allowing us to pinpoint those who would respond better and longer to lower doses than to higher doses of DNA-damaging agents. Under the assumption that the success of DNA-damaging therapy increases with the proliferation rate of a relatively homogeneous tumor population, there was little reason to assume anything other than monotonic dose-response relations. With the recent paradigm shift that most cancers are in fact DNA mosaic products of ongoing evolution, comes the urgency to reconsider these fundamental principles behind DNA-damaging therapy administration. As the developers of one of the first DNA deconvolution methods and with access to technologies to profile the transcriptomes of up to 10,000 cells simultaneously, we are equipped to embark on first personalized dose-finding strategies for DNA-damaging therapies. We will test the potential of the very long-term legacy that DNA-damage entails on a cell “genomic instability” as new biomarker of DNA-damage response. Our preliminary studies showed that, for most cancer types, DNA-damaging agents change a clone's genomic instability and that clones succumb to a limit in the amount of genomic instability they can tolerate. In particular, our results showed that patients with intermediate genomic instability have a very poor outcome and that this relation is only evident among treatment-naive patients, but not among patients treated with DNA-damaging agents. Further they show that we can measure genomic instability per clone and that clones with extreme genomic instability typically don't grow large. Our hypothesis that genomic instability, rather than proliferation rate, determines how sensitive a tumor is to DNA-damaging agents on the long-term, is founded on two unexpected findings. Patients with extremely high genomic instability per tumor clone have an exceptionally good outcome. Aim 1 will integrate exome- and single cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) data to characterize clones and to measure how much genomic instability they can tolerate. Low genomic instability is associated with reduced benefit from DNA-damaging agents. Aim 2 will use comet assays and treatment history to quantify DNA damage per clone, relating it to the clones' ability to tolerate DNA damage and to changes in the genomic instability of therapy-surviving clones.

  Study phs003762

• Sanger sequencing of catalytic-domain encoding exons of tyrosine kinase genes from human endometrial tumor DNAs

  The purpose of the original study was to search for somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinome of serous and clear cell endometrial carcinomas (human). The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1: A mutation discovery screen, in which ~577 exons encoding the catalytic domains of 86 tyrosine kinases were PCR-amplified and bidirectionally Sanger sequenced from 24 serous, 11 clear cell, and 5 mixed histology endometrial tumors. This was followed by alignment of sequence reads to the human reference sequence and subsequent nucleotide variant calling to identify potential somatic (tumor-specific) mutations. Potential somatic mutations were confirmed by re-amplification and sequencing of the relevant tumor DNA as well as matched non-tumor ("normal") DNA from the same case. Phase 2: A mutation prevalence screen, in which the non-catalytic regions two tyrosine kinase genes, TNK2 and DDR1, were PCR-amplified and sequenced from the 40 discovery screen tumors, and all coding exons of TNK2 and DDR1 were PCR-amplified and sequenced from another 10 clear cell, 21 serous, and 41 endometrioid endometrial tumors, in an effort to identify additional somatic mutations in each gene. Exons encoding the exonuclease domain of POLE were also sequenced to document somatic mutations.

  Study phs000841

• Analysis of the Whole Transcriptomes of Human Testis with Complete Spermatogenesis and of Human Testes with Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome

  Sertoli cell-only syndrome is severe form of human male infertility in which most seminiferous tubules appear to lack all spermatogenic cells, including spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). However, a few small tubule segments of some patients have active spermatogenesis and, thus, functional stem cell niches and SSCs. Normally SSCs replicate, migrate and refill adjacent empty niches, but this does not appear to occur in SCO syndrome. We hypothesized that this failure occurs because most niches are dysfunctional. As Sertoli cells are essential to formation of these niches, we used RNAseq to compare the transcriptomes of human testes with qualitatively normal (complete) spermatogenesis (n=4) with the transcriptomes of human testes with SCO syndrome (n=7). We then focused our analysis on the expression of transcripts that bioinformatic analyses identified as Sertoli cell signature transcripts. Results show that Sertoli cells in SCO testes express abnormally low levels of GDNF, FGF8 and BMP4, all of which are important regulators of mouse SSCs and/or progenitor spermatogonia. Sertoli cells in SCO testes express significantly reduced levels of transcripts for proteins that polarize the Sertoli cell plasma membrane and regulate the trafficking of cell adhesion and gap junction proteins in and out of that plasma membrane.

  Study phs001777